ILNews

SCOTUS denies Indiana church dispute

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Supreme Court of the United States has declined to take an Indiana case involving a property and trustee election dispute between the Zion Temple Apostolic Church in Gary and the son of the deceased founding pastor.

An order released Monday morning shows that the justices refused to grant certiorari in the case of David A. Garmon, Sr. and Kenneth E. Garmon, Sr. v. Donsero Reynolds, No. 11-466.

The appeal follows a 33-page, unpublished memorandum decision from the Indiana Court of Appeals on March 31, 2010, which held that now-retired Lake Circuit Judge Lorenzo Arredondo correctly ruled on a case stemming from church happenings dating back two decades.

One of the founder’s sons was appointed as trustee, and after his father’s death in 1991, the trustee left and later returned to the church. The trial judge found that the trustee election held by the succeeding pastor was not legal, and as a result, quiet title deeds to the founding pastor’s property were not valid. But the judge found the surviving son’s actions to transfer parcels to a private trust also weren’t valid because he breached his duties as trustee by leaving the church after his father’s death and not acting in the organization’s interests.

On appeal, the Court of Appeals upheld the trial judge’s decision, and the state justices later denied transfer in early December 2010. A petition for certiorari was filed with the SCOTUS in October.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. My name is joan, I live in United kingdom..I am here to say a big thank you to Dr odun for helping me and making me smile again, after reading a lot of testimonies about Dr odun i wrote him and told him to help me restore my marriage as my home have been scattered for 3yrs now, He replied my email and told me to send my pic and my husband pic and some other things, which i did and he said he will be done in 48hrs, with hope i slept and on the 3rd day Nathaniel called me and asked if i could pack my things to his place and forgive him, i was shocked and this is how dr odun helped me in restoring my. home Contact him: drodunhealinghome@aol.com or his website on drodunhealinghome.webs.com

  2. Indianapolis Bar Association President John Trimble and I are on the same page, but it is a very large page with plenty of room for others to join us. As my final Res Gestae article will express in more detail in a few days, the Great Recession hastened a fundamental and permanent sea change for the global legal service profession. Every state bar is facing the same existential questions that thrust the medical profession into national healthcare reform debates. The bench, bar, and law schools must comprehensively reconsider how we define the practice of law and what it means to access justice. If the three principals of the legal service profession do not recast the vision of their roles and responsibilities soon, the marketplace will dictate those roles and responsibilities without regard for the public interests that the legal profession professes to serve.

  3. I have met some highly placed bureaucrats who vehemently disagree, Mr. Smith. This is not your father's time in America. Some ideas are just too politically incorrect too allow spoken, says those who watch over us for the good of their concept of order.

  4. Lets talk about this without forgetting that Lawyers, too, have FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND ASSOCIATION

  5. Baer filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit on April 30 2015. When will this be decided? How many more appeals does this guy have? Unbelievable this is dragging on like this.

ADVERTISEMENT