Thanks in part to the high-profile health-care summit today, the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee postponed votes this morning
on three Indiana judicial nominees and a Bloomington law professor being considered for a key Department of Justice spot.
At an executive business meeting starting at 10 a.m., the committee chair pointed out that several members were absent because
of President Barack Obama's health-care summit that started at the same time. As a result, the Republican members asked
that debate and votes be postponed on Jon DeGuilio for the Northern District of Indiana, and U.S. Magistrate Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
and Marion Superior Judge Tanya Walton Pratt for the Southern District of Indiana. Also postponed for later action was the
nomination of Dawn Johnsen, who's been chosen to lead the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel.
While the committee had enough members to conduct business and vote, the GOP ranking member Sen. Jeff Sessions from Alabama
asked that more time be given to allow the senators attending the summit to be present to discuss the pending nominations
before casting a vote.
"This is such an extraordinary circumstance, I'll accommodate that request," said committee chair Sen. Pat
Leahy, D-Vt. "The president has asked for bipartisan support (on health care), and I hope we can also have bipartisan
cooperation here."
The judges were first nominated in January and the committee brought the trio to Washington, D.C., on Feb. 11 for a hearing
to field questions. That was before a weeklong President's Day break, which ended this week and gave the committee its
first chance to consider each nominee for an up or down vote. Procedurally, members can automatically hold over any nomination
for a week.
For Johnsen, this is the latest in a line of delays in her confirmation process that first began in February 2009, when the
president nominated her for the seat. Republican committee members opposed her nomination and delayed a vote until March 2009,
but conservative opposition continued and Johnsen never received a vote before the full Senate. Her nomination died at the
end of the year, and the president re-nominated her in January. During the past month, a combination of factors - Republicans
wanting more time, or not attending a meeting to prevent a quorum - has delayed action even longer. This was the fourth delay
on Johnsen's nomination this year.
Committee staff members expect the judicial nominees and Johnsen to be placed on the Senate Judiciary's agenda for next
week to consider whether to forward the nominees to the full Senate. No timeline exists for either the Judiciary or Senate
votes in the confirmation process.














Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...
Yikes!