An Indianapolis judge's potential elevation to the federal appeals bench remains controversial even as the full U.S.
Senate inches closer to voting on his nomination in the next week.
As legislators prepared to confirm another federal judge's nomination Monday, Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.,
said he hopes to have a vote on U.S. Judge David F. Hamilton's move to the 7th Circuit on the morning of Nov. 16. Judge
Hamilton currently sits on the Southern District of Indiana's bench as chief judge.
The Republican minority wants 30 hours of debate on the judge's nomination, according to Reid, who said Democratic leaders
might be forced to cut debate in order to bring a vote to the full legislative body.
Reid said he hopes to reach an agreement with the Republicans on the $134 million military construction legislation. Those
negotiations could impact the discussion on Judge Hamilton's vote, and Reid said it would be a shame to invoke the debate-ending
procedural move known as cloture.
But it's important to hold confirmation votes for the judicial vacancies soon, before the Senate turns to the sweeping
health-care reform legislation before leaving for its Thanksgiving break the following week, Reid said.
His office confirmed this morning that a cloture motion on Judge Hamilton's nomination would likely be filed today, before
senators leave for a three-day Veteran's Day break.
Judge Hamilton has been on the District bench since 1994. If confirmed, he would succeed Circuit Judge Kenneth Ripple, who
took senior status in September 2008.
President Barack Obama nominated Judge Hamilton in February - the new president's first judicial pick. Though the judge
made it through the Senate Judicial Committee in June, he's faced five months of delay as Republican members used rules
to hold up a vote before the full Senate.
Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., appeared before the Senate Monday and blasted Republicans for stalling action on
Obama's judicial picks, noting that 10 judicial nominees are pending on the calendar and only a few have been confirmed
at this point.
"The obstruction and delays in considering President Obama's judicial nominations is especially disappointing given
the extensive efforts by President Obama to turn away from the divisive approach taken by the previous administration and
to reach out to Senators from both parties as he selects mainstream, well-qualified nominees," Leahy said in a floor
statement.














Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!