ILNews

Senior Judge Jonathan Robertson dies

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Court of Appeals has lost a former chief judge who had authored more majority opinions than any of his colleagues during his nearly three decades on the appellate bench.

Judge Jonathan J. Robertson, 76, died about 5:20 p.m. Monday at his home in southern Indiana. He had been diagnosed about four months ago with lung cancer, according to his son, Joe Robertson. The legal community is remembering a man who served his country in the military and public service, and who always kept a sense of humor and had the ability to make everyone smile.

"He was a true patriot who loved his state, country, family, and the law," said Indiana Court of Appeals Chief Judge John G. Baker, a friend who has known the family for more than 30 years. "He was really a quiet cheerleader for all that's good in our business."

Born in Jackson County, Judge Robertson earned his law degree from Vanderbilt University School of Law in 1961 and practiced privately in Seymour until becoming a prosecuting attorney for Jackson County. He served as counsel to the Indiana House of Representatives for a year in 1963, and in 1965 became Jackson Circuit judge until his election to the appellate bench in 1970.

Judge Robertson was part of the last group of appellate jurists to be elected before a constitutional change converted Indiana to a merit selection system in 1971. Since then, he was retained by retention vote three times.

During his time on the Indiana Court of Appeals, Judge Robertson served as chief judge from 1975 to 1978, and was widely seen as one of the most prolific members of the court with his record-setting authoring of more than 3,000 majority opinions.

Judge Robertson partially retired from the appellate court in 1998, but continued serving as senior judge at that level and in southern Indiana's trial courts. His son said the judge had stopped serving at the trial level recently because of his illness, but that he'd continued working up to the end for the appellate court.

Prior to law school, Judge Robertson served in the U.S. Army from 1954 to 1956. He was honorably discharged as a corporal.

His family, friends, and colleagues say they will remember his sense of humor and ability to make anyone smile.

"That sense of humor never left him," the judge's son said. "He always had a joke, always had something nice to say about someone. That will be a hallmark of his life."

Details are being finalized today for funeral services, but his son said a calling will take place Friday afternoon and evening at the Spurgeon Funeral Home in Brownstown. The funeral is expected to take place Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

  2. Seventh Circuit Court Judge Diane Wood has stated in “The Rule of Law in Times of Stress” (2003), “that neither laws nor the procedures used to create or implement them should be secret; and . . . the laws must not be arbitrary.” According to the American Bar Association, Wood’s quote drives home this point: The rule of law also requires that people can expect predictable results from the legal system; this is what Judge Wood implies when she says that “the laws must not be arbitrary.” Predictable results mean that people who act in the same way can expect the law to treat them in the same way. If similar actions do not produce similar legal outcomes, people cannot use the law to guide their actions, and a “rule of law” does not exist.

  3. Linda, I sure hope you are not seeking a law license, for such eighteenth century sentiments could result in your denial in some jurisdictions minting attorneys for our tolerant and inclusive profession.

  4. Mazel Tov to the newlyweds. And to those bakers, photographers, printers, clerks, judges and others who will lose careers and social standing for not saluting the New World (Dis)Order, we can all direct our Two Minutes of Hate as Big Brother asks of us. Progress! Onward!

  5. My daughter was taken from my home at the end of June/2014. I said I would sign the safety plan but my husband would not. My husband said he would leave the house so my daughter could stay with me but the case worker said no her mind is made up she is taking my daughter. My daughter went to a friends and then the friend filed a restraining order which she was told by dcs if she did not then they would take my daughter away from her. The restraining order was not in effect until we were to go to court. Eventually it was dropped but for 2 months DCS refused to allow me to have any contact and was using the restraining order as the reason but it was not in effect. This was Dcs violating my rights. Please help me I don't have the money for an attorney. Can anyone take this case Pro Bono?

ADVERTISEMENT