ILNews

Sidebars: Delicious comfort food is made with care at Indy eatery

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

SidebarsSidebars reviews and rates eateries lawyers may enjoy visiting when working at courthouses throughout Indiana. Jennifer offers this issue’s review of DeeGusto’s Southern Cooking.

Everyone has a complaint about the length of this winter, the snow, the cold, etc. The only good thing about it was that it was a carte blanche to indulge in good ol’ comfort food. That is what Fred and I, with the latest addition to our firm, Mark Busby, discovered at DeeGusto’s Southern Cooking. Now, while DeeGusto’s is not technically by the courthouse, it should be the deciding factor in moving the new judicial center to the former General Motors stamping plant in Indianapolis rather than the airport. It is within a stone’s throw of the GM stamping plant, one of the contending sites for the new judicial center. Have any of the people making this decision completed a gastro-pleasing economic study on whether the airport would be a good place for the new judicial center? Ummm, I’m guessing no (unless they own stock in Waffle House or Denny’s).

Anyway, this small building right before the train tracks on West Washington Street boasts succulent southern cooking clearly made with deliberate attention and love. Mark an hour on your calendar for lunch, grab a colleague and go get some homemade southern cooking. It was a cold day, imagine that, when Fred, Mark and I ventured to fill up on really good comfort food. The restaurant hosts a small number of tables and a takeout window. We were warmly met by the owner and cook and felt immediately welcome.

The decision-making was tough. The menu offers numerous dishes including fried pork chops, chicken wings and fish, as well as some salads and sandwiches. Mark, other than being a fantastic addition to Voyles Zahn & Paul, has a ferocious appetite, which makes him even more of a fit for our firm. He opted for the pork chops smothered in an onion-based gravy, which was plentiful. To accompany that he had sweet potatoes and collard greens. Kudos went to the greens as being perfectly done. They were not soggy and didn’t taste like they had been cooked too long. He was extremely happy with his overall choices, which was evidenced by his empty plate.

Fred opted for the hot chicken wings – big ol’ wings cooked to his spice order. By the mess they made, they were heavily coated in hot sauce. For his sides, he had mac and cheese and french fries. (He was chastised for choosing two starches – emphasizing the care the proprietors have for their customers.) Sneaking a couple of his fries, I loved the crispiness of them. I ordered the fried chicken wings which were piping hot and large. My sides were mashed potatoes and gravy and green beans. Oh, did I mention the homemade cornbread? I was happy as a pig in … well, you know.

There is something for everyone including ribs, fried catfish, meatloaf, chicken and noodles, smothered chicken and huge salads. The sides are purely southern including yams, corn and side salads such as a tomato onion salad. The desserts, for which we did not have stomach room, include a caramel cake that looks delightfully tempting. What is obvious is the care that goes into how every item on the menu is made and served.

You can find more information about the restaurant and, more importantly, the story behind it, at www.deegustoskitchen.com. It appears their menu is about to change, but I guarantee it will be as wholly good and southern as it was when we dined there. They are located at 1430 W. Washington St. and worthy of the jaunt there that may be, hopefully, next to the judicial center now being contemplated.•

__________

Fred Vaiana and Jennifer Lukemeyer practice at Voyles Zahn & Paul in Indianapolis, focusing on criminal defense. Both enjoy a good meal with colleagues and friends. The opinions expressed in this column are those of the authors.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. On a related note, I offered the ICLU my cases against the BLE repeatedly, and sought their amici aid repeatedly as well. Crickets. Usually not even a response. I am guessing they do not do allegations of anti-Christian bias? No matter how glaring? I have posted on other links the amicus brief that did get filed (search this ezine, e.g., Kansas attorney), read the Thomas More Society brief to note what the ACLU ran from like vampires from garlic. An Examiner pledged to advance diversity and inclusion came right out on the record and demanded that I choose Man's law or God's law. I wonder, had I been asked to swear off Allah ... what result then, ICLU? Had I been found of bad character and fitness for advocating sexual deviance, what result then ICLU? Had I been lifetime banned for posting left of center statements denigrating the US Constitution, what result ICLU? Hey, we all know don't we? Rather Biased.

  2. It was mentioned in the article that there have been numerous CLE events to train attorneys on e-filing. I would like someone to provide a list of those events, because I have not seen any such events in east central Indiana, and since Hamilton County is one of the counties where e-filing is mandatory, one would expect some instruction in this area. Come on, people, give some instruction, not just applause!

  3. This law is troubling in two respects: First, why wasn't the law reviewed "with the intention of getting all the facts surrounding the legislation and its actual impact on the marketplace" BEFORE it was passed and signed? Seems a bit backwards to me (even acknowledging that this is the Indiana state legislature we're talking about. Second, what is it with the laws in this state that seem to create artificial monopolies in various industries? Besides this one, the other law that comes to mind is the legislation that governed the granting of licenses to firms that wanted to set up craft distilleries. The licensing was limited to only those entities that were already in the craft beer brewing business. Republicans in this state talk a big game when it comes to being "business friendly". They're friendly alright . . . to certain businesses.

  4. Gretchen, Asia, Roberto, Tonia, Shannon, Cheri, Nicholas, Sondra, Carey, Laura ... my heart breaks for you, reaching out in a forum in which you are ignored by a professional suffering through both compassion fatigue and the love of filthy lucre. Most if not all of you seek a warm blooded Hoosier attorney unafraid to take on the government and plead that government officials have acted unconstitutionally to try to save a family and/or rescue children in need and/or press individual rights against the Leviathan state. I know an attorney from Kansas who has taken such cases across the country, arguing before half of the federal courts of appeal and presenting cases to the US S.Ct. numerous times seeking cert. Unfortunately, due to his zeal for the constitutional rights of peasants and willingness to confront powerful government bureaucrats seemingly violating the same ... he was denied character and fitness certification to join the Indiana bar, even after he was cleared to sit for, and passed, both the bar exam and ethics exam. And was even admitted to the Indiana federal bar! NOW KNOW THIS .... you will face headwinds and difficulties in locating a zealously motivated Hoosier attorney to face off against powerful government agents who violate the constitution, for those who do so tend to end up as marginalized as Paul Odgen, who was driven from the profession. So beware, many are mere expensive lapdogs, the kind of breed who will gladly take a large retainer, but then fail to press against the status quo and powers that be when told to heel to. It is a common belief among some in Indiana that those attorneys who truly fight the power and rigorously confront corruption often end up, actually or metaphorically, in real life or at least as to their careers, as dead as the late, great Gary Welch. All of that said, I wish you the very best in finding a Hoosier attorney with a fighting spirit to press your rights as far as you can, for you do have rights against government actors, no matter what said actors may tell you otherwise. Attorneys outside the elitist camp are often better fighters that those owing the powers that be for their salaries, corner offices and end of year bonuses. So do not be afraid to retain a green horn or unconnected lawyer, many of them are fine men and woman who are yet untainted by the "unique" Hoosier system.

  5. I am not the John below. He is a journalist and talk show host who knows me through my years working in Kansas government. I did no ask John to post the note below ...

ADVERTISEMENT