ILNews

Sidebars: Super sandwich list misses the mark

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

SidebarsThe Indianapolis Star recently published a list of the top 46 sandwich places in the state of Indiana in anticipation of the upcoming Super Bowl event in Indianapolis. After reviewing the list, I was not only disappointed but, quite frankly, a bit upset. Sponsored by the Indiana Office of Tourism Development, the list was developed in part by the Super Bowl Host Committee and experts from Indianapolis Monthly magazine. I wondered about the extent of the research because of several notable absences. I’m taking a detour from the usual format of this column to stand on my soap box so those omitted from this list can rightly be heard.

While I’ve had many of the sandwiches on this list, I’ve not had most of them. I am sure some are quite good and that some on the list of 46 cannot hold a candle to some of the places listed below, which tells me not much time and/or genuine effort went into the merits of the list. Just because it boasts fresh fruit, can a peanut butter and jelly sandwich truly represent the best of what Indiana has to offer?

Of the listed 46, eight sandwiches were breaded pork tenderloins and one was a grilled pork tenderloin. Nothing represents the Hoosier State like a pork tenderloin sandwich, but did we really have to dedicate nearly 20 percent of the list to it? One of my first reviews was the tenderloin at the Gnaw Bone Café in Gnaw Bone, Ind. After a hiatus, the sandwich is now served at the Gnaw Mart, in the heart of Gnaw Bone, on State Route 46. I haven’t had all of the other eight on the list, but since the Gnaw Bone version was good enough to garner an article in Gourmet magazine (and by me!) that should probably be the one and only state representative in the tenderloin category.

Three of the 46 are pulled pork sandwiches. I’ve had them all and none hold a candle to the pulled pork sandwich at Circle City Soups located in the historic City Market in Indianapolis. You must try the pulled pork sandwich at Circle City Soups and the prosciutto and spinach sandwich at Café Olivia. Both outshine the pulled pork from Papa Roux, also in City Market and at the previously reviewed location near 10th Street and Post Road in Indianapolis. While the Papa Roux version is very good and on the list of Super 46 sandwiches, the other two surpass it. Some sandwiches are well-suited to make the list of 46. The Reuben at Shapiro’s is an Indiana staple, but some of my Jewish friends from New York were not as overly impressed as I am. I was pleased to see the Batali from Goose the Market on the list. It was voted a top sandwich nationwide by Bon Appétit magazine, so I would have hit the roof if this wasn’t on it. The Batali is truly one of Indiana’s finest.

Eight of the 46 are burgers, if you count the one veggie burger from Broad Ripple Brewpub. Burgers come in so many varieties and preferences making this is a tough category to judge as “best.” Burgers from Bub’s and Workingman’s Friend are deservingly on the list, but I can’t see how the Duane Purvis All-American Burger from West Lafayette’s Triple XXX (basically a burger with peanut butter) outshines those at the Capital Grille in downtown Indy or the burger at Shipley’s Tavern in Madison. While Triple XXX was featured on “Diners, Drive-ins and Dives” and positively reviewed by me, that doesn’t mean other places don’t deserve showcase recognition on a list like the Super 46 in its stead.

I could go on, but here’s a sampling of what I think deserves placement on the Super 46 list, Jenny’s opinion notwithstanding. I am sure I’ve omitted some:

• Hank’s Smoked Brisket, 3736 Martin Luther King Dr., Indianapolis (A must try.)

• Capital Grille, The Conrad Hotel, Indianapolis (This $16 cheeseburger is worth every penny, especially with the truffle oil fries. Plus, it’s much cheaper than a $40 steak and every bit as satisfying. I know it’s a franchise but it’s my column so I can break my own rules.)

• Shipley’s Tavern, 322 West St., Madison (Semantic battle sometimes with Indianapolis’ Slippery Noodle Inn as to which is the oldest bar in Indiana. The previously reviewed cheeseburger was among my first, and among my few, four-gavel ratings.)

• Circle City Soups, City Market, Indianapolis (Amazing pulled pork. Try the adjacent Circle City Sweets for nationally recognized and award-winning chocolates.)

• Café Olivia, City Market, Indianapolis (An immensely talented sandwich maker. The spinach and prosciutto is my favorite.)

• South of Chicago, Virginia and College Avenues, Indianapolis (authentic Italian beef, sausage and meatball sandwiches and outstanding pizza, too).

• The Black Market, 922 Massachusetts Ave., Indianapolis (The burger is 1/2 lamb and 1/2 beef and dressed with goat cheese. This is a seasonal menu so check availability.)

• Portillo’s, 555 East 81st St., Merrillville (While a franchise, it remains privately held. The Italian beef and hot dogs alone are worth the trip. Get some vacuum-sealed ribs to take home, they won’t disappoint.)

• Koney King, 4601 Broadway, Gary (since 1920 and the best coney dog EVER. The cheeseburgers are addictive.)

• King David Dogs, 135 N. Pennsylvania St., Indianapolis (an Indy original since 1941 literally puts Indiana’s stamp on hot dogs).

To see the Super 46 list, which pares down to one winner on Feb. 2, 2012, visit www.super46.com.
__________

Fred Vaiana and Jennifer M. Lukemeyer practice at Voyles Zahn Paul Hogan & Merriman in Indianapolis, focusing in criminal defense. Vaiana is a 1992 graduate of the John Marshall Law School in Chicago. Lukemeyer earned her J.D. from Southern Methodist University in 1994 and is active in the Indianapolis Bar Association, Indianapolis Inn of Courts and the Teen Court Program. The opinions expressed in this column are those of the authors.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Thanks
    Great post and thank you for shout out to Circle City Soups and Sweets! One of Indys most hidden gems!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. If real money was spent on this study, what a shame. And if some air-head professor tries to use this to advance a career, pity the poor student. I am approaching a time that i (and others around me) should be vigilant. I don't think I'm anywhere near there yet, but seeing the subject I was looking forward to something I might use to look for some benchmarks. When finally finding my way to the hidden questionnaire all I could say to myself was...what a joke. Those are open and obvious signs of any impaired lawyer (or non-lawyer, for that matter), And if one needs a checklist to discern those tell-tale signs of impairment at any age, one shouldn't be practicing law. Another reason I don't regret dropping my ABA membership some number of years ago.

  2. The case should have been spiked. Give the kid a break. He can serve and maybe die for Uncle Sam and can't have a drink? Wow. And they won't even let him defend himself. What a gross lack of prosecutorial oversight and judgment. WOW

  3. I work with some older lawyers in the 70s, 80s, and they are sharp as tacks compared to the foggy minded, undisciplined, inexperienced, listless & aimless "youths" being churned out by the diploma mill law schools by the tens of thousands. A client is generally lucky to land a lawyer who has decided to stay in practice a long time. Young people shouldn't kid themselves. Experience is golden especially in something like law. When you start out as a new lawyer you are about as powerful as a babe in the cradle. Whereas the silver halo of age usually crowns someone who can strike like thunder.

  4. YES I WENT THROUGH THIS BEFORE IN A DIFFERENT SITUATION WITH MY YOUNGEST SON PEOPLE NEED TO LEAVE US ALONE WITH DCS IF WE ARE NOT HURTING OR NEGLECT OUR CHILDREN WHY ARE THEY EVEN CALLED OUT AND THE PEOPLE MAKING FALSE REPORTS NEED TO GO TO JAIL AND HAVE A CLASS D FELONY ON THERE RECORD TO SEE HOW IT FEELS. I WENT THREW ALOT WHEN HE WAS TAKEN WHAT ELSE DOES THESE SCHOOL WANT ME TO SERVE 25 YEARS TO LIFE ON LIES THERE TELLING OR EVEN LE SAME THING LIED TO THE COUNTY PROSECUTOR JUST SO I WOULD GET ARRESTED AND GET TIME HE THOUGHT AND IT TURNED OUT I DID WHAT I HAD TO DO NOT PROUD OF WHAT HAPPEN AND SHOULD KNOW ABOUT SEEKING MEDICAL ATTENTION FOR MY CHILD I AM DISABLED AND SICK OF GETTING TREATED BADLY HOW WOULD THEY LIKE IT IF I CALLED APS ON THEM FOR A CHANGE THEN THEY CAN COME AND ARREST THEM RIGHT OUT OF THE SCHOOL. NOW WE ARE HOMELESS AND THE CHILDREN ARE STAYING WITH A RELATIVE AND GUARDIAN AND THE SCHOOL WON'T LET THEM GO TO SCHOOL THERE BUT WANT THEM TO GO TO SCHOOL WHERE BULLYING IS ALLOWED REAL SMART THINKING ON A SCHOOL STAFF.

  5. Family court judges never fail to surprise me with their irrational thinking. First of all any man who abuses his wife is not fit to be a parent. A man who can't control his anger should not be allowed around his child unsupervised period. Just because he's never been convicted of abusing his child doesn't mean he won't and maybe he hasn't but a man that has such poor judgement and control is not fit to parent without oversight - only a moron would think otherwise. Secondly, why should the mother have to pay? He's the one who made the poor decisions to abuse and he should be the one to pay the price - monetarily and otherwise. Yes it's sad that the little girl may be deprived of her father, but really what kind of father is he - the one that abuses her mother the one that can't even step up and do what's necessary on his own instead the abused mother is to pay for him???? What is this Judge thinking? Another example of how this world rewards bad behavior and punishes those who do right. Way to go Judge - NOT.

ADVERTISEMENT