ILNews

Sidebars: Tavern on South gains favorable ruling

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

SidebarsI frequented Tavern on South twice for this exercise and both times I was not disappointed. The first trip I was accompanied by the Hon. Heather Welch and my colleague Jim Voyles, and the second trip by Bob Hill, Marion County’s chief public defender. Going twice provided an opportunity to diversify my review and check the consistency of its offerings.

Practically next door to Lucas Oil Stadium on South Street (go figure), this warehouse has been transformed to a really cool joint. Modern but comfortable and not too “tavernish,” it is very accessible because of its large parking lot immediately east of the building. On game days, it may not be as accessible by car, but I’m sure the foot traffic will provide the owners with record days.

On my first trip, Jim ordered a side Tuscan salad (really a Greek salad) which impressed him as being fresh, not drowning in dressing, and the perfect size. He indulged in a tavern crispy pepperoni pizza which is on wheat thin crust. Jim, the traditionalist, got scared of some of the bread offerings on the sandwich list because no sandwich was offered on Wonder Bread or Sunbeam Wheat. His fear guided him well with his pizza. The pizza offerings also include a Red (red sauce, red pepper, mozzarella, parmesan and fresh basil), White (béchamel, mozzarella, parmesan and white cheddar) and the Black & Blue (barbeque sauce, Cajun beef tenderloin, mozzarella and blue cheese). Heather polished off her Circle City Club of grilled chicken, Mariah’s Indiana peppered bacon, goat cheese, and pesto tomato, served on grilled ciabatta. (Heather, being the good, open-minded Democrat she is, did not shy away from the non-traditional bread choices.) She ruled in favor of the sandwich by cleaning her plate. I could not resist the Tavern Tenderloin Sliders served with mustard aioli and lettuce on pretzel rolls. Those little suckers were as good as the larger versions! I opted for the herb dusted French fries, but the homemade kettle chips are the way to go.

Overall, service and food-wise, they were about knock-it-out-of-the-park until we (well, “we” being Jim) ordered a simple dessert of ice cream and some chocolate sauce. We waited and waited and waited until we could wait no more. The place got busy and we were forgotten so we asked for our check as Jim wiped that lone tear drop from his cheek.

On the second visit, Bob and I split the crab ravioli which was bland and not worth the calories. I wish we would have opted for the crispy Maple Leaf Farms duck wings with your choice of salt and vinegar, garlic buffalo, or shagbark hickory teriyaki. Apparently Bob, like myself, abides by the saying “I did not fight my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian.” He devoured the Tavern Smoked Bison Burger dressed up with charred tomato barbeque glaze and peppercorn bacon on brioche roll. I daintily ate the Tavern Smoked Prime Rib on grilled ciabatta with onions, smoky natural jus, and horseradish mousse. The “Tavern Smoked” preparation of both sandwiches added great flavor, and I would suggest either. If you are vegetarian they do offer a roasted pepper and grilled Portobello sandwich and some entrée-size salads and the non-meat pizzas, of course. The second visit was consistent with the first so that is a good sign.

Grab a colleague, friend, opposing counsel, mentor/mentee and enjoy sophisticated food in a sophisticated-tavern-type setting. Worthy of 3.5 gavels – if only you had remembered the ice cream and forgotten the crab ravioli!

Tavern on South is located at 423 W. South Street in Indianapolis, Ind. For more details visit: www.tavernonsouth.com.•

Fred Vaiana and Jennifer M. Lukemeyer practice at Voyles Zahn Paul Hogan & Merriman in Indianapolis, focusing in criminal defense. Vaiana is a 1992 graduate of the John Marshall Law School in Chicago. Lukemeyer earned her J.D. from Southern Methodist University in 1994 and is active in the Indianapolis Bar Association, Indianapolis Inn of Courts, and the Teen Court Program. The opinions expressed in this column are the authors’.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The practitioners and judges who hail E-filing as the Saviour of the West need to contain their respective excitements. E-filing is federal court requires the practitioner to cram his motion practice into pigeonholes created by IT people. Compound motions or those seeking alternative relief are effectively barred, unless the practitioner wants to receive a tart note from some functionary admonishing about the "problem". E-filing is just another method by which courts and judges transfer their burden to practitioners, who are the really the only powerless components of the system. Of COURSE it is easier for the court to require all of its imput to conform to certain formats, but this imposition does NOT improve the quality of the practice of law and does NOT improve the ability of the practitioner to advocate for his client or to fashion pleadings that exactly conform to his client's best interests. And we should be very wary of the disingenuous pablum about the costs. The courts will find a way to stick it to the practitioner. Lake County is a VERY good example of this rapaciousness. Any one who does not believe this is invited to review the various special fees that system imposes upon practitioners- as practitioners- and upon each case ON TOP of the court costs normal in every case manually filed. Jurisprudence according to Aldous Huxley.

  2. Any attorneys who practice in federal court should be able to say the same as I can ... efiling is great. I have been doing it in fed court since it started way back. Pacer has its drawbacks, but the ability to hit an e-docket and pull up anything and everything onscreen is a huge plus for a litigator, eps the sole practitioner, who lacks a filing clerk and the paralegal support of large firms. Were I an Indiana attorney I would welcome this great step forward.

  3. Can we get full disclosure on lobbyist's payments to legislatures such as Mr Buck? AS long as there are idiots that are disrespectful of neighbors and intent on shooting fireworks every night, some kind of regulations are needed.

  4. I am the mother of the child in this case. My silence on the matter was due to the fact that I filed, both in Illinois and Indiana, child support cases. I even filed supporting documentation with the Indiana family law court. Not sure whether this information was provided to the court of appeals or not. Wish the case was done before moving to Indiana, because no matter what, there is NO WAY the state of Illinois would have allowed an appeal on a child support case!

  5. "No one is safe when the Legislature is in session."

ADVERTISEMENT