ILNews

Sidebars: Unassuming storefront houses flavorful Mexican food

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

SidebarsI’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: regardless of your views on our nation’s immigration policy, one resultant benefit is the prolific uptick in ethnic dining options. When it comes to Mexican food, there are so many mom-and-pop choices it is hard to know where to turn. This spot makes your decision an easy one.

Flanked this day by Chris Moyer from Segway of Indiana, it was based on his recommendation we have lunch at La Escollera, having dined there himself on several previous visits. Chris knows his food and having introduced me to the previously reviewed stellar fish tacos at Broad Ripple’s Monon Food Company, I trust his recommendations implicitly. Once again he failed to disappoint.

La Escollera boasts an unassuming storefront, resembling half a garden greenhouse, on the east side of Indianapolis. Nothing fancy inside but a clean, inviting atmosphere nonetheless. We immediately seated ourselves and our server graced us with tortilla chips (the real kind, fried in lard) and fresh-made salsa. I ordered guacamole as one of my first tests. I’ve found in other places if that’s freshly made, good things are to follow. When I heard the sound of chopping from the kitchen, I figured we would get what we bargained for, and we did.

The fresh salsa and guacamole reminded me of a beachside cantina I once shared lunch at with my wife Amy in Playa del Carmen, Mexico. The difference was as we had that sun-drenched lunch in Mexico, we overlooked a pristine beach, littered with nubile women enjoying some topless sunbathing. This date, I found myself with Chris on an inordinately gray day, overlooking East Washington Street in Indianapolis after a late March snowstorm. Not quite the same, but at least the food was good!

The expansive menu is heavily influenced by seafood options. Despite that, Chris ordered two beef tongue tacos while I chose two marinated pork tacos. Each came dressed authentically, only with cilantro and sweet onion. Chris ordered a side of refried beans and rice dubbed by him as the best in the city. The tacos, wrapped in double-layered corn tortillas, were alive with flavor, especially when enhanced with a few spoonfuls of smoky, chipotle-peppered hot sauce.

As we ate, the place gradually began to fill up with patrons. At the risk of offending EEOC lawyers and, worse yet, incurring the wrath of my editor, let’s just say as far as the clientele goes on this day, we were the only two white, English-speaking guys in the place. Another good sign.

I saw shrimp cocktail come to one table. Imagine the largest beer schooner from a place like The Workingman’s Friend generously stuffed with shrimp and cocktail sauce. The other fish and shrimp platters looked tantalizing, albeit fried. Some patrons ordered fajitas, brought to their table on sizzling platters, filling the restaurant air with smells that beckoned me to walk over and ask for a bite. I didn’t because I know I’ll be back.

So thank you Chris for your recommendation. Speaking of Chris, if any of you readers want to try out a Segway, check out the tours Chris offers at White River State Park. It’s a great experience for your office or family. After your tour, visit La Escollera for a great meal washed down with a cold cerveza. Sorry, no beach though. La Escollera, 5834 E. Washington St., Indianapolis, IN 46219. 317-375-9556.•

__________

Fred Vaiana and Jennifer Lukemeyer practice at Voyles Zahn & Paul in Indianapolis, focusing in criminal defense. Both enjoy a good meal with colleagues and friends, and their Sidebars column reviews and rates eateries lawyers may enjoy visiting when working at courthouses throughout Indiana. The opinions expressed in this column are those of the authors.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The practitioners and judges who hail E-filing as the Saviour of the West need to contain their respective excitements. E-filing is federal court requires the practitioner to cram his motion practice into pigeonholes created by IT people. Compound motions or those seeking alternative relief are effectively barred, unless the practitioner wants to receive a tart note from some functionary admonishing about the "problem". E-filing is just another method by which courts and judges transfer their burden to practitioners, who are the really the only powerless components of the system. Of COURSE it is easier for the court to require all of its imput to conform to certain formats, but this imposition does NOT improve the quality of the practice of law and does NOT improve the ability of the practitioner to advocate for his client or to fashion pleadings that exactly conform to his client's best interests. And we should be very wary of the disingenuous pablum about the costs. The courts will find a way to stick it to the practitioner. Lake County is a VERY good example of this rapaciousness. Any one who does not believe this is invited to review the various special fees that system imposes upon practitioners- as practitioners- and upon each case ON TOP of the court costs normal in every case manually filed. Jurisprudence according to Aldous Huxley.

  2. Any attorneys who practice in federal court should be able to say the same as I can ... efiling is great. I have been doing it in fed court since it started way back. Pacer has its drawbacks, but the ability to hit an e-docket and pull up anything and everything onscreen is a huge plus for a litigator, eps the sole practitioner, who lacks a filing clerk and the paralegal support of large firms. Were I an Indiana attorney I would welcome this great step forward.

  3. Can we get full disclosure on lobbyist's payments to legislatures such as Mr Buck? AS long as there are idiots that are disrespectful of neighbors and intent on shooting fireworks every night, some kind of regulations are needed.

  4. I am the mother of the child in this case. My silence on the matter was due to the fact that I filed, both in Illinois and Indiana, child support cases. I even filed supporting documentation with the Indiana family law court. Not sure whether this information was provided to the court of appeals or not. Wish the case was done before moving to Indiana, because no matter what, there is NO WAY the state of Illinois would have allowed an appeal on a child support case!

  5. "No one is safe when the Legislature is in session."

ADVERTISEMENT