Simon grant allows ILS to continue helping the homeless

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For individuals struggling with homelessness, a legal problem can pale in comparison to the dilemma of finding a place to sleep at night or getting something to eat.

biesecker-annette-mug.jpg Biesecker

Indiana Legal Services attorney Annette Biesecker has witnessed this prioritizing of troubles from her position supervising the ILS Horizon House Legal Clinic. She credited the staff at Horizon House, a nonprofit day center for the homeless in Indianapolis, with tending to the immediate needs by working to help these individuals get food stamps, medical care, employment and permanent housing.

That work, Biesecker said, is more important than what she does.

However, resolving a legal problem like a suspended driver’s license or unpaid child support can remove a significant financial barrier and give a homeless person a real boost toward long-term stability. So every Thursday, ILS attorney Amy Skelton or Biesecker offer advice and counsel to individuals who rely on Horizon House.

“Sometimes the people who need you the most are the least able to discover you,” Biesecker said. “This group needs us the most.”

The ILS initiative got some much-needed stability of its own when the Herbert Simon Family Foundation gave a $60,000 two-year grant in 2014. Recently, the foundation renewed its support with a $45,000 three-year grant.

Biesecker said the additional grant money enables Indiana Legal Services to make the clinic sustainable.

Currently, the funding is paying the salary of Skelton as well as part of the salary of Biesecker and other attorneys. As the amount of the grant declines over the next three years from $20,000 to $15,000 to $10,000, ILS will gradually absorb the personnel costs and continue to offer the services.

“I am delighted,” Biesecker said of the grant. “I am a big fan of the Herbert Simon Family Foundation and the way they nurture programs.”

In 2016, the ILS homeless clinic served 129 individuals at Horizon House who had a range of legal problems from family law cases involving child support and divorce to criminal record expungement, landlord-tenant disputes and driver’s licenses issues. Also, the clinic gives guidance about matters that do not merit full representation.

Leslie Kelly, program director at Horizon House, said the neighbors (Horizon House parlance for the homeless who visit the center) benefit from having an attorney onsite. They are less intimidated about approaching a lawyer because they are not worried about having enough money to pay or about being able to explain their problems.

“Accessibility to civil legal consultation and the legal process is critical for our neighbors but not necessarily easy to come by, so having an ILS attorney right in the dayroom on a weekly basis really makes this partnership work,” Kelly wrote in an email. “For our neighbors who often have complex barriers to employment and housing, resolving a legal issue or finding out there is no legal remedy can make the difference in moving a neighbor forward on a journey toward stability.”

The key to connecting with the Horizon House neighbors is the licensed lawyer.

ILS had been sending a paralegal to the facility but no one ever used the service. Curious what was happening, Biesecker went to Horizon House herself, plunked her name plate on the table and took a seat. The clients have been coming ever since.

Jeffrey Darling is among those who approached Biesecker. The 59-year-old is trying to get Social Security disability benefits but following the initial denial of his claim, he realized he needed an attorney to help him through the appeals process. He called upon other lawyers but could not find one to take his case.

Then he met Biesecker. Now he has someone who can navigate the bureaucracy as well as push him to do the things he needs to do to keep his appeal moving forward.

“She’s pretty great,” Darling said of his attorney.

As Biesecker pointed out with many of the individuals who use Horizon House, Darling has immediate needs that outweigh his legal matter. He is homeless and was sleeping on the streets. Other people kept stealing his blankets, and the cold weather came so he has been slipping into a local shelter each night. But he sleeps by the exit and leaves first thing each morning because he does not like the crowded quarters.

At Horizon House, he can take a shower, do his laundry and choose from a breakfast menu of peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, doughnuts and oatmeal.

Darling slid into his current situation because of his criminal record and mental disability. Getting assistance from Social Security would enable him to get a permanent residence and alleviate the stress that comes with having to find shelter and food every day.

From her vantage point, Biesecker has seen the “overwhelming complexity of the life of a homeless person.” She has been surprised to learn how important a driver’s license is and how many homeless people work when they can get jobs.

Biesecker compared her work at Horizon House to bailing out the Titanic with a teaspoon. “But at least I’m not putting more water in,” she said.•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. OK, take notice. Those wondering just how corrupt the Indiana system is can see the picture in this post. Attorney Donald James did not criticize any judges, he merely, it would seem, caused some clients to file against him and then ignored his own defense. James thus disrespected the system via ignoring all and was also ordered to reimburse the commission $525.88 for the costs of prosecuting the first case against him. Yes, nearly $526 for all the costs, the state having proved it all. Ouch, right? Now consider whistleblower and constitutionalist and citizen journalist Paul Ogden who criticized a judge, defended himself in such a professional fashion as to have half the case against him thrown out by the ISC and was then handed a career ending $10,000 bill as "half the costs" of the state crucifying him. THE TAKEAWAY MESSAGE for any who have ears to hear ... resist Star Chamber and pay with your career ... welcome to the Indiana system of (cough) justice.

  2. GMA Ranger, I, too, was warned against posting on how the Ind govt was attempting to destroy me professionally, and visit great costs and even destitution upon my family through their processing. No doubt the discussion in Indy today is likely how to ban me from this site (I expect I soon will be), just as they have banned me from emailing them at the BLE and Office of Bar Admission and ADA coordinator -- or, if that fails, whether they can file a complaint against my Kansas or SCOTUS law license for telling just how they operate and offering all of my files over the past decade to any of good will. The elitist insiders running the Hoosier social control mechanisms realize that knowledge and a unified response will be the end of their unjust reign. They fear exposure and accountability. I was banned for life from the Indiana bar for questioning government processing, that is, for being a whistleblower. Hoosier whistleblowers suffer much. I have no doubt, Gma Ranger, of what you report. They fear us, but realize as long as they keep us in fear of them, they can control us. Kinda like the kids' show Ants. Tyrannical governments the world over are being shaken by empowered citizens. Hoosiers dealing with The Capitol are often dealing with tyranny. Time to rise up: Back to the Founders! MAGA!

  3. Science is showing us the root of addiction is the lack of connection (with people). Criminalizing people who are lonely is a gross misinterpretation of what data is revealing and the approach we must take to combat mental health. Harsher crimes from drug dealers? where there is a demand there is a market, so make it legal and encourage these citizens to be functioning members of a society with competitive market opportunities. Legalize are "drugs" and quit wasting tax payer dollars on frivolous incarceration. The system is destroying lives and doing it in the name of privatized profits. To demonize loneliness and destroy lives in the land of opportunity is not freedom.

  4. Good luck, but as I have documented in three Hail Mary's to the SCOTUS, two applications (2007 & 2013),a civil rights suit and my own kicked-to-the-curb prayer for mandamus. all supported in detailed affidavits with full legal briefing (never considered), the ISC knows that the BLE operates "above the law" (i.e. unconstitutionally) and does not give a damn. In fact, that is how it was designed to control the lawyers. IU Law Prof. Patrick Baude blew the whistle while he was Ind Bar Examiner President back in 1993, even he was shut down. It is a masonic system that blackballs those whom the elite disdain. Here is the basic thrust: When I asked why I was initially denied, the court's foremost jester wrote back that the ten examiners all voted, and I did not gain the needed votes for approval (whatever that is, probably ten) and thus I was not in .. nothing written, no explanation, just go away or appeal ... and if you appeal and disagree with their system .. proof positive you lack character and fitness. It is both arbitrary and capricious by its very design. The Hoosier legal elites are monarchical minded, and rejected me for life for ostensibly failing to sufficiently respect man's law (due to my stated regard for God's law -- which they questioned me on, after remanding me for a psych eval for holding such Higher Law beliefs) while breaking their own rules, breaking federal statutory law, and violating federal and state constitutions and ancient due process standards .. all well documented as they "processed me" over many years.... yes years ... they have few standards that they will not bulldoze to get to the end desired. And the ISC knows this, and they keep it in play. So sad, And the fed courts refuse to do anything, and so the blackballing show goes on ... it is the Indy way. My final experience here: I will open my files to anyone interested in seeing justice dawn over Indy. My cases are an open book, just ask.

  5. Looks like 2017 will be another notable year for these cases. I have a Grandson involved in a CHINS case that should never have been. He and the whole family are being held hostage by CPS and the 'current mood' of the CPS caseworker. If the parents disagree with a decision, they are penalized. I, along with other were posting on Jasper County Online News, but all were quickly warned to remove posts. I totally understand that some children need these services, but in this case, it was mistakes, covered by coorcement of father to sign papers, lies and cover-ups. The most astonishing thing was within 2 weeks of this child being placed with CPS, a private adoption agency was asking questions regarding child's family in the area. I believe a photo that was taken by CPS manager at the very onset during the CHINS co-ocerment and the intent was to make money. I have even been warned not to post or speak to anyone regarding this case. Parents have completed all requirements, met foster parents, get visitation 2 days a week, and still the next court date is all the way out till May 1, which gives them(CPS) plenty of to time make further demands (which I expect) No trust of these 'seasoned' case managers, as I have already learned too much about their dirty little tricks. If they discover that I have posted here, I expect they will not be happy and penalized parents again. Still a Hostage.