ILNews

Simon sues insurance companies over fatal escalator accident

Scott Olson
June 27, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Simon Property Group Inc. has filed suit against two insurance companies in an attempt to recoup damages relating to an escalator accident at Circle Centre mall in 2009 that led to the death of a Texas FFA delegate.

Simon, along with its Circle Centre Mall LLC entity, is suing Schaumburg, Ill.-based Zurich American Insurance Co. and Greensburg, Pa.-based Old Republic Insurance Co. in Marion Superior Court for unspecified damages.

The two firms insured escalator servicer Schindler Elevator Corp. at the time of the fall in October 2009. Police reports at the time said Philip Caler, a Texas FFA delegate in Indianapolis for the agricultural organization’s national convention, suffered critical injuries when he fell about 40 feet from an escalator near the third floor of the mall.

Caler, 20, died in September 2013 from his injuries, which included damage to his spine and brain.

In 2011, Caler’s parents filed suit against Simon, the mall, and the escalator company, among others, seeking damages due to their negligence, according to Simon’s complaint against the insurance companies.

Simon and Circle Centre settled the suit in July 2013 with help from their insurance company, XL Insurance America Inc. But Simon and Circle Centre claim in their complaint against Zurich and Old Republic that the two insurance companies failed to follow through on promises that they also would provide coverage to help with losses.

“As a result, Circle Center and Simon have been forced to institute this action to recover what should have been routine payments under the applicable policies,” their lawyer, Gregory A. Neibarger of Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP, wrote in the complaint.

Reached by phone, Neibarger declined to comment further. Representatives of Zurich and Old Republic did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Indianapolis Business Journal on Friday.

Simon and Circle Centre are suing for breach of contract and bad faith.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  2. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  3. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  4. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

  5. Here's an idea...how about we MORE heavily regulate the law schools to reduce the surplus of graduates, driving starting salaries up for those new grads, so that we can all pay our insane amount of student loans off in a reasonable amount of time and then be able to afford to do pro bono & low-fee work? I've got friends in other industries, radiology for example, and their schools accept a very limited number of students so there will never be a glut of new grads and everyone's pay stays high. For example, my radiologist friend's school accepted just six new students per year.

ADVERTISEMENT