ILNews

Smaller class sizes cause faculty buyout offers at Valpo Law

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

In an announcement made Feb. 26, Valparaiso University Law School added itself to the list of law schools shedding faculty in the face of declining enrollment.

The northwest Indiana law school, founded in 1879, has offered buyouts to the 27 faculty members who are either tenured or have multi-year contracts. Dean Andrea Lyon declined to share the terms of the buyout offers and did not have a set number of professorships that would be cut. Instead, she said the law school has a budget target, but she was not at liberty to provide the details.

Lyon Lyon

“We have to get smaller, like most law schools,” Lyon said, acknowledging that downturn in the legal market that has led to fewer jobs and law school applicants.

“We have to right-size the faculty to respond to that.”

Law school layoffs and closures have been predicted for the past couple of years. Applications across the country have been dropping since reaching 87,900 in the fall of 2010, according to the Law School Admission Council. When applications dipped below 60,000 for the first time in 30 years in 2013, William Henderson, professor at Indiana University Maurer School of Law who has done extensive research on the changes in the legal profession, predicted “massive layoffs in law schools.”

Among the law schools that have offered faulty buyouts are Vermont Law School, Louisiana State University Paul M. Hebert Law Center, New England Law, SUNY-Buffalo Law School, University of Denver Sturm College of Law and Western Michigan University Thomas M. Cooley Law School.

No other Indiana law school has announced buyouts or layoffs, but Indiana Tech Law School did waive tuition for all students during the 2015-2016 school year.

The Valparaiso Law School pointed to the post-recession slump in applications and enrollment numbers which are causing “a diverse mix of financial challenges.”

“To put the Law School and our students in the best position to succeed, we are taking steps to meet the challenges facing legal education,” the school said in a statement, adding that “based on thorough due diligence” the school made the “difficult but necessary decision” to allow faculty members to request a buyout of their contracts.

“The purpose is to align the size of the faculty with the expected future law school enrollment,” the statement continued. “Valparaiso University and its board are fully committed to the future of the law school and are taking this step to ensure its future success.”

‘Butts in the seats’

Kyle McEntee, executive director and co-founder of Law School Transparency, disputed Valparaiso Law School’s explanation. LST was founded in 2009 and analyzes enrollment and graduation data of individual law schools with the goal of promoting reform in legal education.

The trouble is of Valparaiso Law School’s own making, he said. “The truth is the school got too big, too fast and as it has expanded, the value proposition for students is not there.”

The school’s enrollment peaked in 2011 with 218 new students. However, McEntee said class members had “extraordinarily weak indicators” that they could successfully complete their studies and pass the bar exam.

The class that entered in 2011 had a median LSAT score of 149 and a median GPA of 3.19. When the graduates took bar exams in 2014, the composite first-time average passage rate for the February and July tests was 62.1 percent, according to data from LST. Comparatively, the class that entered in 2010 had a median LSAT score and GPA of 150 and 3.31, respectively. That class logged a composite first-time average bar passage rate of 76 percent.

McEntee pointed to the differences between the incoming classes in 2012 and 2013 as a hint to the law school’s strategy. Valparaiso Law School increased the entering class size from 163 in 2012 to 208 in 2013, but the median GPA dropped from 3.16 to 3.00 and the median LSAT fell from 149 to 143.

Looking at the 2013 stats, McEntee said Valparaiso Law School made a “clear bargain” to “get butts in the seats.”

In 2015, 130 students entered the law school, down from 174 students the prior year. The median GPA of the current 1L students was 2.93 and they had a median LSAT score of 145.

David Hollenbeck, a 1974 alumnus of the law school and an adjunct professor since 1985, said he has not seen a decline in the quality of students. The attorney at Blachly Tabor Bozik & Hartman LLC in Valparaiso teaches classes on local government law, municipal finance law and workers’ compensation to third-year students.

“They are bright, young educated people who can’t wait to get done with their third year so they can start practicing law,” Hollenbeck said.

His firm often brings in Valparaiso law students to serve as law clerks and hires many of the school’s graduates. Valparaiso “produces damn good lawyers,” he said.

Smaller model

Hollenbeck said he was not surprised that the law school had to consolidate. The drop in people taking the LSAT and the smaller enrollment planted in the back of his mind the possibility that the faculty would be downsized. However, he quickly added, the reduction is impacting faculty members he admires, respects and tries to emulate in his own teaching.

The faculty and the ability to interact with them attracted attorney Nathan Vis to attend Valparaiso Law School. Law schools throughout the country study the same books and case law, he said, but Valparaiso stood apart because students could pop into professors’ offices or continue conversations after class and benefit from the faculty’s knowledge and experience.

Vis, an associate at Blachly Tabor Bozik & Hartman LLC, graduated from Valparaiso Law School in 2010. He, too, was not surprised by the school’s decision to shrink, but he noted there are some very highly qualified faculty members whom he would hate to see let go.

The Indiana Lawyer attempted to contact some faculty members but none returned messages.

According to Lyon, Valparaiso Law School will retain its focus on diversity regarding race, age and other factors, and will continue evaluating prospective students based on a holistic approach, looking at factors beyond LSAT scores.“That’s not going to change,” she said, “but we also have to recognize the market is what it is. We really respect and honor the faculty that has been here. It’s not an easy thing to do.”

Looming on the horizon is the likelihood the American Bar Association will tighten the law school standards for attrition and bar passage rates, McEntee said. Law schools that have a high number of students dropping out and a low number of graduates passing the bar exam could lose their accreditation.

McEntee speculated Valparaiso Law School is positioning itself to continue to meet the ABA requirements by becoming smaller. Even with the downsizing, McEntee believes it will be able to attract qualified faculty if the school shows it is building something new.

“I look at it as an opportunity for the school to do something different,” he said.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have had an ongoing custody case for 6 yrs. I should have been the sole legal custodial parent but was a victim of a vindictive ex and the system biasedly supported him. He is an alcoholic and doesn't even have a license for two yrs now after his 2nd DUI. Fast frwd 6 yrs later my kids are suffering poor nutritional health, psychological issues, failing in school, have NO MD and the GAL could care less, DCS doesn't care. The child isn't getting his ADHD med he needs and will not succeed in life living this way. NO one will HELP our family.I tried for over 6 yrs. The judge called me an idiot for not knowing how to enter evidence and the last hearing was 8 mths ago. That in itself is unjust! The kids want to be with their Mother! They are being alienated from her and fed lies by their Father! I was hit in a car accident 3 yrs ago and am declared handicapped myself. Poor poor way to treat the indigent in Indiana!

  2. The Indiana DOE released the 2015-2016 school grades in Dec 2016 and my local elementary school is a "C" grade school. Look at the MCCSC boundary maps and how all of the most affluent neighborhoods have the best performance. It is no surprise that obtaining residency in the "A" school boundaries cost 1.5 to 3 times as much. As a parent I should have more options than my "C" school without needing to pay the premium to live in the affluent parts of town. If the charter were authorized by a non-religious school the plaintiffs would still be against it because it would still be taking per-pupil money from them. They are hiding behind the guise of religion as a basis for their argument when this is clearly all about money and nothing else.

  3. This is a horrible headline. The article is about challenging the ability of Grace College to serve as an authorizer. 7 Oaks is not a religiously affiliated school

  4. Congratulations to Judge Carmichael for making it to the final three! She is an outstanding Judge and the people of Indiana will benefit tremendously if/when she is chosen.

  5. The headline change to from "religious" to "religious-affiliated" is still inaccurate and terribly misleading.

ADVERTISEMENT