Some Lake civil cases go to random filing

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Attorneys opening new civil cases in Lake County should note that a new random filing system is being put in place, a plan described as the most extensive use of this in the county's history.

A caseload allocation plan submitted to the Indiana Supreme Court last fall took effect in January, meaning that various civil cases are starting this system.

Filings of miscellaneous civil and mortgage foreclosures began random filing Jan. 1, while civil plenary and civil torts begin April 1, Lake Superior Judge John Pera said.

This means that an attorney must initially file a case in Crown Point, and then that case will be randomly assigned to another location or retained in that central spot, Judge Pera said.

In Lake Superior's seven civil division courtrooms and one Circuit court, attorneys have traditionally been able to choose where they file their cases. Judge Pera said that practice has contributed to delays because of a hefty disparity among the courts' caseloads - such as only 60 mortgage foreclosures filed in East Chicago last year and more than 900 in one Crown Point courtroom alone.

Now, most of the courts are moving to this new system, which is already used in criminal courts to ensure a more balanced caseload within the courtrooms, Judge Pera said. Lake Superior Judge Elizabeth Tavitas, who primarily handles domestic relations and family cases, is exempt from those changes.

The judge points out that 85 percent or more civil cases are filed initially by mail, so this centralized filing method will cut delays.

Notices about the change are posted in the local county clerk's offices and are also being sent out from the courts to attorneys when pleadings are filed, Judge Pera said.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. So men who think they are girls at heart can use the lady's potty? Usually the longer line is for the women's loo, so, the ladies may be the ones to experience temporary gender dysphoria, who knows? Is it ok to joke about his or is that hate? I may need a brainwash too, hey! I may just object to my own comment, later, if I get myself properly "oriented"

  2. Heritage, what Heritage? The New Age is dawning .... an experiment in disordered liberty and social fragmentation is upon us .... "Carmel City Council approved a human rights ordinance with a 4-3 vote Monday night after hearing about two hours of divided public testimony. The ordinance bans discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, among other traits. Council members Rick Sharp, Carol Schleif, Sue Finkam and Ron Carter voted in favor of it. The three council members opposing it—Luci Snyder, Kevin Rider and Eric Seidensticker—all said they were against any form of discrimination, but had issues with the wording and possible unintended consequences of the proposal." Kardashian is the new Black.

  3. Can anyone please tell me if anyone is appealing the law that certain sex offenders can't be on school property. How is somebody supposed to watch their children's sports games or graduations, this law needs revised such as sex offenders that are on school property must have another non-offender adult with them at all times while on school property. That they must go to the event and then leave directly afterwards. This is only going to hurt the children of the offenders and the father/ son mother/ daughter vice versa relationship. Please email me and let me know if there is a group that is appealing this for reasons other than voting and religion. Thank you.

  4. Should any attorney who argues against the abortion industry, or presents arguments based upon the Founders' concept of Higher Law, (like that marriage precedes the State) have to check in with the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program for a mandatory mental health review? Some think so ... that could certainly cut down on cases such as this "cluttering up" the SCOTUS docket ... use JLAP to deny all uber conservative attorneys licenses and uber conservative representation will tank. If the ends justify the means, why not?

  5. Tell them sherry Mckay told you to call, they're trying to get all the people that have been wronged and held unlawfully to sign up on this class action lawsuit.