ILNews

South Bend school wins national competition; 2013 event to be in Indiana

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For the second time in three years, South Bend’s John Adams High School won the annual National High School Mock Trial Championship.

In the competition, students are given a fictitious case to try before a jury. Each team plays the roles of attorneys and witnesses, performing all functions of a jury trial in 2.5 hours. This year’s case involved a complex land dispute between an American Indian tribe and a uranium mining company.

The competition included teams from 48 states and territories, and teams from South Korea and Australia. John Adams High School has placed in the top 10 teams nationally nine times in the past 10 years, earning widespread recognition for the strength of its mock trial program. At this year’s competition in Phoenix May 5 - 7, the national organization chose Indiana as the site of the 2013 competition.

Ann Marie Waldron, attorney at Indianapolis firm Robinson Wolenty & Young, is the host coordinator for the 2013 tournament. “We look forward to showcasing our program to the students from across the U.S. and other countries and are planning to ‘wow’ them in 2013,” she said.

Indiana’s mock trial program is run entirely by volunteers like Waldron. The South Bend team is coached by John Scanlan, professor emeritus for Indiana University Maurer School of Law; attorneys Erin Linder and Andrew Jones; drama coach Lucas Burkett; and teacher Heath Weaver. The volunteer board includes Penn High School Principal Steven Hope; Waldron; Susan Roberts, partner with the Lafayette firm Stuart & Branigin and state coordinator for the Indiana High School Mock Trial competition; Scott Keller of Anderson Agostino & Keller in South Bend; and Peter Horvath, student services program director at Notre Dame Law School.

Waldron said about 400 judges and attorney volunteers will be needed to staff the national competition in 2013.

The national mock trial championship began in 1984 in Des Moines, Iowa, with teams from Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska and Wisconsin participating. After the success of the tournament in Iowa, more states became interested in participating, and the tournament became billed as an "All-State" tournament.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT