Southern District to ‘borrow’ judges to ease judicial emergency

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two Wisconsin district court judges will begin lending their services to the Hoosier state Wednesday as part of a pilot partnership designed to ease the caseloads of the judges of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, consistently ranked among the 10 busiest federal district courts.

After Judge Sarah Evans Barker assumed senior judge status in June 2014, her vacant seat on the Southern District bench, which has yet to be filled, prompted the beginning of what the U.S. Courts Administrative Office terms a “judicial emergency” within the court. In the 12-month period ending June 30, 2016, the weighted filings per judgeship in the Southern District were 717, and the district had the seventh-highest number of total case filings and fourth-highest number of civil filings of any of the nation’s 94 district courts that year.

But through the new “borrowing and lending” partnership that will launch tomorrow, Chief Judge William C. Griesbach and Judge Lynn S. Adelman of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin will begin taking a “discrete number” of civil case assignments from the Indianapolis docket for the next three months.

The Judicial Conference of the United States Committee on Intercircuit Assignments identified the Indiana Southern District as a potential pilot court for the new program, which was officially approved by the Judicial Conference last September. Earlier this month, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals entered a designation to allow Griesbach and Adelman to perform duties in the Southern District.

Even before Barker assumed senior status is June 2014, the Southern District of Indiana carried the sixth-heaviest weighted caseload, with each of the judges handling an average of 724 cases. President Barack Obama nominated Winfield Ong to succeed Barker, but the chief of the criminal division of the Southern District U.S. Attorney's office never received a confirmation vote in the Senate.

“We’ve been, according to weighted caseload measures set up by the Administrative Office, short a judge for 20 years, but it’s highly unlikely we’ll get a new judgeship created,” Chief Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson told Indiana Lawyer in late 2016.

In announcing the pilot partnership, the Southern District said it continues to seek a more permanent solution to its judicial emergency. In every study it has conducted since 2005, the Judicial Conference has recommended that Congress create an additional judgeship to ease the caseload in Indiana’s Southern District.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Or does the study merely wish they fade away? “It just hasn’t risen substantially in decades,” Joan Williams, director of the Center for WorkLife Law at the University of California Hastings College of the Law told Law360. “What we should be looking for is progress, and that’s not what we’re seeing.” PROGRESS = less white males in leadership. Thus the heading and honest questions here ....

  2. One need not wonder why we are importing sex slaves into North America. Perhaps these hapless victims of human trafficking were being imported for a book of play with the Royal Order of Jesters? Indianapolis hosts these major pervs in a big way .... I wonder what affect they exert on Hoosier politics? And its judiciary? A very interesting program on their history and preferences here:

  3. Joseph Buser, Montgomery County Chief Prosecutor, has been involved in both representing the State of Indiana as Prosecutor while filing as Representing Attorney on behalf of himself and the State of Indiana in Civil Proceedings for seized cash and merchandise using a Verified Complaint For Forfeiture of Motor Vehicle, Us Currency And Reimbursement Of Costs, as is evident in Montgomery County Circuit Court Case Number 54C01-1401-MI-000018, CCS below, seen before Judge Harry Siamas, and filed on 01/13/2014. Sheriff Mark Castille is also named. All three defendants named by summons have prior convictions under Mr. Buser, which as the Indiana Supreme Court, in the opinion of The Matter of Mark R. McKinney, No. 18S00-0905-DI-220, stated that McKinney created a conflict of interest by simultaneously prosecuting drug offender cases while pocketing assets seized from defendants in those cases. All moneys that come from forfeitures MUST go to the COMMON SCHOOL FUND.

  4. I was incarcerated at that time for driving while suspended I have no felonies...i was placed on P block I remember several girls and myself asking about voting that day..and wasn't given a answer or means of voting..we were told after the election who won that was it.

  5. The number one way to reduce suffering would be to ban the breeding of fighting dogs. Fighting dogs maim and kill victim dogs Fighting dogs are the most essential piece of dog fighting Dog fighting will continue as long as fighting dogs are struggling to reach each other and maul another fih.longaphernalia