ILNews

Sports fan-turned-attorney finds dream job at NCAA

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
In-House Counsel

Naima Stevenson’s love for sports began about the time she realized that sports fans in her household got to watch the big TV.

Stevenson said she and her mother watched movies together on a small television, while her stepfather watched sports on the home’s larger television.

“I said, ‘I’m tired of looking at this little TV,’” Stevenson said. So, as a 7-year-old, she joined her stepfather to watch and learn about football, golf, and all the other sports he followed.

Now 34, Stevenson has many opportunities to follow sports as the assistant general counsel and director of legal affairs for the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
 

stevenson-naima-15col Naima Stevenson (IL Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

She marked her fifth anniversary with the organization this spring, but she said it seems like little time has passed since she got the job offer.

In March 2006, Stevenson visited Indianapolis to interview for the position, during the men’s NCAA Final Four. It was the first trip to Indianapolis for the Brooklyn-born-and-raised Stevenson. She was watching basketball at home when the call came.

“I remember it was Maryland – my alma mater – playing in the women’s Final Four when I got the call,” Stevenson said.

Since joining the NCAA, she has advised the legal staff on a seemingly endless stream of lawsuits. She explained that the NCAA can be sued in any state where it has a member organization, which is why staff relies on outside counsel for litigation.

She advises staff about enforcement and infraction questions. Staff members may ask, for example, if they can request phone records as part of an investigation, or whether certain requests for information are appropriate. But the majority of her work involves advising the busy NCAA Committee on Infractions.

“Institutions have an obligation to almost tell on themselves,” Stevenson said. Colleges will generally report rules violations to the NCAA, and the enforcement staff investigates those reports. If a violation has occurred, the committee on infractions takes over. She attends all hearings for the committee on infractions and travels around the country frequently to attend court proceedings and depositions.

“We’re a small legal staff, so we all pitch in as needed,” she said. And her willingness to jump in and help has not gone unnoticed.

“Naima is highly regarded by her clients and colleagues within the NCAA national office, the membership, and others who work with her on a regular basis,” said Donald Remy, NCAA general counsel and vice president of legal affairs. “She is relied upon to help distill complex issues into practical legal recommendations. Her approach to client service causes her to be sought out, which is one of the highest compliments inside counsel can receive. I am very pleased to have her on my team.”

While Stevenson is a team player in the figurative sense, she said she has never considered herself an athlete. As a child, she reluctantly participated in the Colgate Women’s Games track meet, finishing second-to-last in her group. “I don’t think it was my idea to go – I think it was my mom’s,” she said.

Stevenson does enjoy playing in an annual charity softball game, which is an outreach activity that NCAA Executive Vice President Bernard Franklin established as part of the NCAA African-American Community Enhancement Group. Stevenson said the NCAA fields a team of “hodge podge staff” that competes against employees of Indianapolis radio station WTLC to raise money for charity. For Stevenson, outreach is one of the more rewarding parts of her job.

“Any opportunity I can get to talk to young people – that’s something I enjoy,” she said.

She volunteers to read to children during Indiana Black Expo when youth groups participating in Expo events are on lunch break. She said she enjoys reading children’s books by her friend, Sahar Simmons, author of the “Briana’s Neighborhood” series.

Simmons also grew up in Brooklyn, and has known Stevenson since the two were children. “My sister and she are best friends – she has literally been in my life since elementary school,” Simmons said.

“Naima is one of the most genuine and kind-hearted people that I know,” Simmons said. “She is extremely driven, but she doesn’t come across harsh.”

Even as a child, Stevenson was driven to succeed – she correctly predicted in the fifth grade that she would become a lawyer and graduate from Harvard University. And it was while she was working on her Juris Doctorate at Harvard that she decided to pursue a career in sports law. She knew that no sports organization would hire someone fresh out of law school for a corporate counsel position, so she decided to join a firm and gain some real-life experience.

She joined Arnold & Porter in Washington, D.C., where she was a corporate and securities associate for five years. During that time, she said she “started really getting the itch to look for sports law opportunities,” and that led her to interview for the NCAA job.

Stevenson’s love of sports has also played a big role in her personal life. This year, she became engaged to Stephen Starks, legal affairs director for the United States Anti-Doping Agency. Starks played in the National Basketball Association Development League before earning his law degree from Valparaiso University.

In her spare time, Stevenson still enjoys the hobbies she shared with her mother and stepfather as a child: watching movies and sports.

“I have the NFL Sunday Ticket, so on Sundays, I’m on the couch watching football,” she said.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. He TIL team,please zap this comment too since it was merely marking a scammer and not reflecting on the story. Thanks, happy Monday, keep up the fine work.

  2. You just need my social security number sent to your Gmail account to process then loan, right? Beware scammers indeed.

  3. The appellate court just said doctors can be sued for reporting child abuse. The most dangerous form of child abuse with the highest mortality rate of any form of child abuse (between 6% and 9% according to the below listed studies). Now doctors will be far less likely to report this form of dangerous child abuse in Indiana. If you want to know what this is, google the names Lacey Spears, Julie Conley (and look at what happened when uninformed judges returned that child against medical advice), Hope Ybarra, and Dixie Blanchard. Here is some really good reporting on what this allegation was: http://media.star-telegram.com/Munchausenmoms/ Here are the two research papers: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0145213487900810 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213403000309 25% of sibling are dead in that second study. 25%!!! Unbelievable ruling. Chilling. Wrong.

  4. Mr. Levin says that the BMV engaged in misconduct--that the BMV (or, rather, someone in the BMV) knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged fees but did nothing to correct the situation. Such misconduct, whether engaged in by one individual or by a group, is called theft (defined as knowingly or intentionally exerting unauthorized control over the property of another person with the intent to deprive the other person of the property's value or use). Theft is a crime in Indiana (as it still is in most of the civilized world). One wonders, then, why there have been no criminal prosecutions of BMV officials for this theft? Government misconduct doesn't occur in a vacuum. An individual who works for or oversees a government agency is responsible for the misconduct. In this instance, somebody (or somebodies) with the BMV, at some time, knew Indiana motorists were being overcharged. What's more, this person (or these people), even after having the error of their ways pointed out to them, did nothing to fix the problem. Instead, the overcharges continued. Thus, the taxpayers of Indiana are also on the hook for the millions of dollars in attorneys fees (for both sides; the BMV didn't see fit to avail itself of the services of a lawyer employed by the state government) that had to be spent in order to finally convince the BMV that stealing money from Indiana motorists was a bad thing. Given that the BMV official(s) responsible for this crime continued their misconduct, covered it up, and never did anything until the agency reached an agreeable settlement, it seems the statute of limitations for prosecuting these folks has not yet run. I hope our Attorney General is paying attention to this fiasco and is seriously considering prosecution. Indiana, the state that works . . . for thieves.

  5. I'm glad that attorney Carl Hayes, who represented the BMV in this case, is able to say that his client "is pleased to have resolved the issue". Everyone makes mistakes, even bureaucratic behemoths like Indiana's BMV. So to some extent we need to be forgiving of such mistakes. But when those mistakes are going to cost Indiana taxpayers millions of dollars to rectify (because neither plaintiff's counsel nor Mr. Hayes gave freely of their services, and the BMV, being a state-funded agency, relies on taxpayer dollars to pay these attorneys their fees), the agency doesn't have a right to feel "pleased to have resolved the issue". One is left wondering why the BMV feels so pleased with this resolution? The magnitude of the agency's overcharges might suggest to some that, perhaps, these errors were more than mere oversight. Could this be why the agency is so "pleased" with this resolution? Will Indiana motorists ever be assured that the culture of incompetence (if not worse) that the BMV seems to have fostered is no longer the status quo? Or will even more "overcharges" and lawsuits result? It's fairly obvious who is really "pleased to have resolved the issue", and it's not Indiana's taxpayers who are on the hook for the legal fees generated in these cases.

ADVERTISEMENT