ILNews

Start Page: Make the most of your 24 hours with workflow planning

Seth Wilson
March 26, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WilsonLawyers are hardworking professionals. But, most feel like there is more work to get done than is possible in the 24 hours everyone has each day. Legal professionals understand the reality of professional development: “the better you get, the better you’d better get.” (David Allen, author of “Getting Things Done”) So how can you manage work and all of life’s other commitments? Develop, and use, good workflow plans.

Here are three tips to help you “plan your work and work your plan” (Vince Lombardi):

Track what you do and how you do it

Review and reflect

Draft a plan and do

Track what you do and how you do it

Workflow planning starts by simply observing how you already “do work.” The goal here is to capture enough data about what you already do to later organize that work in the most efficient and effective way possible.

To start, grab a legal pad (or your favorite notebook) and take notes on what you do now to get things done. Also, make notes on what type of work you do (e.g., making phone calls, writing, reviewing documents, entering time and meeting with clients).

Use your notes to identify the patterns in the work you do. Jot down times when you often get interrupted. Note when you feel most productive. Think about what time of day is best for you to perform tasks that require the most focus and thought. Consider where you work best on certain types of projects.

While you are capturing this information, think about your current system for tracking your to-dos. Sticky notes? Legal pads? Is your to-do list on your computer, phone or tablet? When is the last time you updated your to-do list? Do you only make a list of things to do when you can’t keep track of everything in your head? Maybe it’s time for a new system?

It may take a week to gather enough information to identify some patterns, so keep at it. Your notes should be detailed enough to jog your memory and help you act as a productivity consultant for yourself.

Review and reflect

The key success factor is to actually take time to review your notes. Remember that note you made on your best time for projects that require focus and thought? Schedule an appointment with yourself at that time slot to review the remaining notes you have made on your workflow. What stands out to you? What patterns developed? Are there types of tasks that are similar in nature? The idea here is to evaluate how you are doing things to make sure that you are being as effective as possible.

Ask yourself: Am I the best person to perform all these tasks? Learn to delegate what you can to keep yourself free to focus on things that require your particular skills.

Draft a plan and do

You have created and reviewed your workflow. Now, it is time to draft workflow plans. Start the week by scheduling several two-hour appointments on your calendar to work on projects that take large blocks of time to complete. Choose several projects to work on during those times. Discipline yourself to actually do what you said you would do that day.

Next, make a list of the next steps needed to move your projects forward this week. Keep that list up to date, organized by the type of tasks to be completed (e.g., a list of phone calls to be made when you have access to a phone). Microsoft Outlook Tasks or a smartphone app are great for tracking and sorting these tasks.

Think through the best place to do a task. For example, don’t write out a long email on your smartphone. Put “draft email to atty smith re: property transfer” on a list of things to accomplish when you have a full-sized keyboard available (or access to dictation).

Finally, draft checklists for yourself (and your assistant) on what to do with the various inputs you face every day (email, snail mail, etc). As an example, I have a workflow plan for turning my snail mail into email for review. I take my snail mail directly to a scanner and scan it to my email. I return to my office, handle any immediate actions from the mail and file the paper mail. Later, I review and file the email with my workflow for processing email.

Draft and work your workflow plan. Review and revise it as necessary. Continue to improve your processes until they work as smoothly and effectively as you do at your best. You will feel more in control and better able to focus on tackling the work – and fun – that comes your way.•

__________

Seth Wilson is a partner at Hume Smith Geddes Green & Simmons LLP in Indianapolis. In addition to practicing law, he helps manage the day-to-day technology operations of the firm, and frequently speaks and advises on legal technology issues. The opinions expressed are those of the author.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I have been on this program while on parole from 2011-2013. No person should be forced mentally to share private details of their personal life with total strangers. Also giving permission for a mental therapist to report to your parole agent that your not participating in group therapy because you don't have the financial mean to be in the group therapy. I was personally singled out and sent back three times for not having money and also sent back within the six month when you aren't to be sent according to state law. I will work to het this INSOMM's removed from this state. I also had twelve or thirteen parole agents with a fifteen month period. Thanks for your time.

  2. Our nation produces very few jurists of the caliber of Justice DOUGLAS and his peers these days. Here is that great civil libertarian, who recognized government as both a blessing and, when corrupted by ideological interests, a curse: "Once the investigator has only the conscience of government as a guide, the conscience can become ‘ravenous,’ as Cromwell, bent on destroying Thomas More, said in Bolt, A Man For All Seasons (1960), p. 120. The First Amendment mirrors many episodes where men, harried and harassed by government, sought refuge in their conscience, as these lines of Thomas More show: ‘MORE: And when we stand before God, and you are sent to Paradise for doing according to your conscience, *575 and I am damned for not doing according to mine, will you come with me, for fellowship? ‘CRANMER: So those of us whose names are there are damned, Sir Thomas? ‘MORE: I don't know, Your Grace. I have no window to look into another man's conscience. I condemn no one. ‘CRANMER: Then the matter is capable of question? ‘MORE: Certainly. ‘CRANMER: But that you owe obedience to your King is not capable of question. So weigh a doubt against a certainty—and sign. ‘MORE: Some men think the Earth is round, others think it flat; it is a matter capable of question. But if it is flat, will the King's command make it round? And if it is round, will the King's command flatten it? No, I will not sign.’ Id., pp. 132—133. DOUGLAS THEN WROTE: Where government is the Big Brother,11 privacy gives way to surveillance. **909 But our commitment is otherwise. *576 By the First Amendment we have staked our security on freedom to promote a multiplicity of ideas, to associate at will with kindred spirits, and to defy governmental intrusion into these precincts" Gibson v. Florida Legislative Investigation Comm., 372 U.S. 539, 574-76, 83 S. Ct. 889, 908-09, 9 L. Ed. 2d 929 (1963) Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, concurring. I write: Happy Memorial Day to all -- God please bless our fallen who lived and died to preserve constitutional governance in our wonderful series of Republics. And God open the eyes of those government officials who denounce the constitutions of these Republics by arbitrary actions arising out capricious motives.

  3. From back in the day before secularism got a stranglehold on Hoosier jurists comes this great excerpt via Indiana federal court judge Allan Sharp, dedicated to those many Indiana government attorneys (with whom I have dealt) who count the law as a mere tool, an optional tool that is not to be used when political correctness compels a more acceptable result than merely following the path that the law directs: ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. I. In a scene following a visit by Henry VIII to the home of Sir Thomas More, playwriter Robert Bolt puts the following words into the mouths of his characters: Margaret: Father, that man's bad. MORE: There is no law against that. ROPER: There is! God's law! MORE: Then God can arrest him. ROPER: Sophistication upon sophistication! MORE: No, sheer simplicity. The law, Roper, the law. I know what's legal not what's right. And I'll stick to what's legal. ROPER: Then you set man's law above God's! MORE: No, far below; but let me draw your attention to a fact I'm not God. The currents and eddies of right and wrong, which you find such plain sailing, I can't navigate. I'm no voyager. But in the thickets of law, oh, there I'm a forester. I doubt if there's a man alive who could follow me there, thank God... ALICE: (Exasperated, pointing after Rich) While you talk, he's gone! MORE: And go he should, if he was the Devil himself, until he broke the law! ROPER: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! MORE: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? ROPER: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! MORE: (Roused and excited) Oh? (Advances on Roper) And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws being flat? (He leaves *1257 him) This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast man's laws, not God's and if you cut them down and you're just the man to do it d'you really think you would stand upright in the winds that would blow then? (Quietly) Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake. ROPER: I have long suspected this; this is the golden calf; the law's your god. MORE: (Wearily) Oh, Roper, you're a fool, God's my god... (Rather bitterly) But I find him rather too (Very bitterly) subtle... I don't know where he is nor what he wants. ROPER: My God wants service, to the end and unremitting; nothing else! MORE: (Dryly) Are you sure that's God! He sounds like Moloch. But indeed it may be God And whoever hunts for me, Roper, God or Devil, will find me hiding in the thickets of the law! And I'll hide my daughter with me! Not hoist her up the mainmast of your seagoing principles! They put about too nimbly! (Exit More. They all look after him). Pgs. 65-67, A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS A Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt, Random House, New York, 1960. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, Indianapolis, for defendants. Childs v. Duckworth, 509 F. Supp. 1254, 1256 (N.D. Ind. 1981) aff'd, 705 F.2d 915 (7th Cir. 1983)

  4. "Meanwhile small- and mid-size firms are getting squeezed and likely will not survive unless they become a boutique firm." I've been a business attorney in small, and now mid-size firm for over 30 years, and for over 30 years legal consultants have been preaching this exact same mantra of impending doom for small and mid-sized firms -- verbatim. This claim apparently helps them gin up merger opportunities from smaller firms who become convinced that they need to become larger overnight. The claim that large corporations are interested in cost-saving and efficiency has likewise been preached for decades, and is likewise bunk. If large corporations had any real interest in saving money they wouldn't use large law firms whose rates are substantially higher than those of high-quality mid-sized firms.

  5. The family is the foundation of all human government. That is the Grand Design. Modern governments throw off this Design and make bureaucratic war against the family, as does Hollywood and cultural elitists such as third wave feminists. Since WWII we have been on a ship of fools that way, with both the elite and government and their social engineering hacks relentlessly attacking the very foundation of social order. And their success? See it in the streets of Fergusson, on the food stamp doles (mostly broken families)and in the above article. Reject the Grand Design for true social function, enter the Glorious State to manage social dysfunction. Our Brave New World will be a prison camp, and we will welcome it as the only way to manage given the anarchy without it.

ADVERTISEMENT