ILNews

State court offices, law firm on lockdown after shots fired in Indianapolis

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A lone gunman caused downtown Indianapolis – including Indiana State Court Administration offices and law firm Barnes & Thornburg – to be on lockdown today.

The gunman was atop a South Meridian Street parking garage when he fired "indiscriminate" shots into the air Thursday afternoon before shooting himself and falling to the sidewalk below, Indianapolis Metropolitan Police spokesman Lt. Jeff Duhamell said.

Officers were called to the Denison Parking garage just north of Maryland Street about 2:20 p.m. after receiving reports of shots fired. Several witnesses told police they saw an individual on the eighth floor of the parking garage armed with two handguns.

"He fired a couple indiscriminate shots in the air" before turning a gun on himself, Duhamell said.

The man was identified only as a white male in his late 40s or early 50s.

Neighboring businesses were locked down as a precaution, he said, after initial reports indicated there were two shooters. A police sharpshooter had his rifle trained on the parking garage roof until investigators determined the gunman was acting alone.

Meridian Street was closed between Washington and Maryland streets while crime scene investigators worked.

Attorneys at Barnes & Thornburg were huddled in their offices at 11 S. Meridian as police tried to sort out the situation. Though attorneys didn’t know what was happening outside, they were told not to go outside and to stay away from the external walls – which were penetrated by two bullets, according to partner Don Knebel.

Knebel told Indiana Lawyer that the firm decided about 3:30 p.m. to send an e-mail alerting employees about the situation, and that they should move to the center of the building. Knebel was inside a conference room with about nine other attorneys, who were receiving news updates from their BlackBerries.

Indiana Supreme Court public information officer Kathryn Dolan, who has an office in the 30 S. Meridian building across from the parking garage, said several people in the Division of State Court Administration heard the gunshots and saw the man shoot himself and then fall from the garage.

Police told them they couldn’t enter the garage for a few hours and were being kept from leaving the building onto South Meridian. Court employees were told they could leave early through another exit, and the division would them connect with counseling if they needed it, Dolan said.

“It’s been a difficult afternoon,” she said.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  2. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  3. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

  4. Here's an idea...how about we MORE heavily regulate the law schools to reduce the surplus of graduates, driving starting salaries up for those new grads, so that we can all pay our insane amount of student loans off in a reasonable amount of time and then be able to afford to do pro bono & low-fee work? I've got friends in other industries, radiology for example, and their schools accept a very limited number of students so there will never be a glut of new grads and everyone's pay stays high. For example, my radiologist friend's school accepted just six new students per year.

  5. I totally agree with John Smith.

ADVERTISEMENT