ILNews

State settles with legal malpractice insurer

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A legal malpractice insurance carrier has agreed to pay $16.5 million to Indiana's insurance department, settling a federal lawsuit that had come on the heels of a state malpractice claim where an Indianapolis law firm got hit with an $18 million verdict.

Indianapolis attorney Joe Chapelle with Barnes & Thornburg, who represented ProNational Insurance, said the settlement involves paying $16.5 million in response to the 4-month-old bad faith and breach of contract suit filed in the Southern District of Indiana. Payment instructions haven't been finalized, Chapelle said.

"It's important that there was no finding by the department of bad faith," he said. "We are pleased with the outcome and the company is pleased to be able to put this behind them."

Cohen & Malad attorney Irwin Levin, who represented the Indiana Department of Insurance, acknowledged a settlement had been reached but declined to comment before his client had an opportunity to respond. State agencies are closed today in observance of Columbus Day. The proposed agreement came Oct. 10 in Jim Atterholt v. ProNational Insurance Company, No. 1:08-cv-0834-DFH-WTL, which came against ProNational for declining multiple opportunities to settle a state court malpractice claim against attorney Frederick W. Dennerline III and firm Fillenwarth Dennerline Groth & Towe.

That claim involved Dennerline's involvement in a failed health plan that left 8,200 Hoosiers with unpaid medical bills. He had served as outside counsel for the health plan Indiana Construction Industry Trust that ultimately went defunct. Earlier this year, the law firm assigned its rights to the insurance commissioner and paid $50,000, releasing it from any obligation to pay the multi-million dollar verdict.

Check out tomorrow's Indiana Lawyer Daily for an update of this story.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hail to our Constitutional Law Expert in the Executive Office! “What you’re not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law,” Obama said.

  2. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  3. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  4. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  5. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

ADVERTISEMENT