ILNews

State’s longest-seated chief public defender dies

IL Staff
October 1, 2010
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana’s longest-seated chief public defender and the first ever public defender in Porter County died unexpectedly Sept. 29.

James V. Tsoutsouris, 74, started his private practice in Valparaiso in 1967 after he graduated from Valparaiso University School of Law. His practice focused on criminal defense, family law, and personal injury.

Tsoutsouris also served in the United States Army, from which he was honorably discharged.

He is survived by his wife, Linda O’Brien; children Wolfgang (Tamara) Tsoutsouris, Damian Tsoutsouris, and Natasha Tsoutsouris; step-children Jason Eberhardt and Julie Eberhardt; two grandchildren; three sisters; two brothers; and many nieces and nephews.

Visitation will be today from 3 to 8 p.m. and Saturday one hour prior to service at Moeller Funeral Home, 104 Roosevelt Road, Valparaiso. In lieu of flowers, memorial contributions may be made to The Caring Place, 3107 Cascade Dr., Valparaiso, 46383; Habitat for Humanity Porter County, P.O. Box 492, Valparaiso, 46384-0492; or the United Negro College Fund, 8260 Willow Oaks Corporate Dr., Fairfax, VA 22031.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT