ILNews

Suddenly solo

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

At the 2010 Indiana State Bar Association Solo and Small Firm Conference in June, then-ISBA president Roderick Morgan welcomed those in attendance, particularly those who found themselves to be “suddenly solo.”

While he may not be the first to use the phrase, a number of attorneys have found themselves either making that decision or having it made for them in the last couple years.

solo-kassebaum-15col Fishers attorney Jeanette C. Kassebaum is chair of the ISBA’s General Practice Solo and Small Firm Section. She said many attorneys have become solo in recent years for a variety of reasons, sometimes by choice and sometimes by chance. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

In fact, an all-day CLE on the topic that was scheduled for early February at the Indiana Continuing Legal Education Forum will be rescheduled to take place later this year. Coordinators for the 2011 ISBA Solo and Small Firm Conference are also expecting a number of suddenly solo practitioners to attend that event June 2-4 in French Lick.

Those who have already gone solo tell others in the same situation not to fear, that there are many resources available, including bar associations and solo practitioners, and that there really is enough work to go around for those who want it.

In a December 2010 Res Gestae article, Fishers attorney Jeanette C. Kassebaum, chair of the ISBA General Practice, Solo and Small Firm Section, offered “Tips for the suddenly solo.” In that article, she referenced a September 2010 ABA Journal report that found 419,000 attorneys in the United States are solos, about half of all attorneys.

Kassebaum told Indiana Lawyer there are a variety of reasons why these attorneys are solos, “whether they are solo by choice or solo by chance,” she said.

In her case, Kassebaum said that after she was admitted to the bar in October 1991, she struggled to find her ideal job: working at a small firm in Hamilton County or a neighboring county. In the meantime, she started sharing office space with an attorney in Fishers.

“All that time I was still thinking I would get a job somewhere,” she said. She continued to share space, then served as of counsel for a firm, and, in 1996, she went out on her own.

As to why so many attorneys are solo now, Kassebaum said, “I think people want to go solo to control their own practices. They want to control their own schedules, they want to control the types of cases they handle, they want to control their office environments, and they want to practice in the way they want to.

“They also want to have some control over their work product. I think that’s the driving force behind most attorneys who decide to be solos. They want to take pride in their own work rather than deal with the bureaucracy and social complexities of firms,” she added.

Kassebaum said the economic downturn has also led to more attorneys practicing law independently.

When faced with an uncertain economy, she said, “People are forced to rethink how they can practice. A lot of attorneys in big firms have never done this before. … But when they do get downsized, they realize it’s not terribly insurmountable to do this on your own with the right support and available information.”

She said she has also heard of more recent law school graduates becoming solos because they are having trouble finding work or know there aren’t many firm jobs or government jobs available due to budget cuts.

Solo by chance

Granger attorney Jonathan Watson was laid off from a law firm in late 2009. He said the Elkhart firm was experiencing a downturn because its clients – RV companies – were experiencing their own downturns.

He said the firm was “as amicable as it could be” when they informed him he would lose his job.

“I sent out 40 different resumes and applications,” he said.

He had two interviews, but neither was for a job that would let him stay in the Elkhart area, which was a deal breaker for him and his family.

Ultimately, his father-in-law encouraged him to start his own firm.

He accepts “whatever comes in the door,” including family law, estate planning, small business law, and litigation. He added he will often end up with referrals from other attorneys who do not like to litigate.

He also now has time to be an adjunct professor. He teaches contracts, real estate, and technology in the paralegal studies departments of Indiana University – South Bend and Ivy Tech.

His wife has helped him part-time, and he has been able to do most of the work from his home, he explained, including meetings at a local bank’s community room that he can schedule as needed.

As for attorneys looking to start their own firms, Watson suggests they grow into their office space instead of the other way around.

“Do what you can afford now, and get a bigger office as your office grows,” he said. He also suggested attorneys network with other solo attorneys in their areas and for attorneys that share office space to consider having separate P.O. boxes and separate phone numbers in case the arrangement dissolves.

Indianapolis attorney Joanne McAnlis also lost her job due to the economic downturn. But being proactive helped her prepare.

When she recognized that Duke, her former employer, was going through workforce reductions, she decided to get her broker’s license. She started Counsel Realty LLC and McAnlis Law LLC in 2009.

She said it was the classes she took for her broker’s license that made her realize she wanted to combine her legal experience in contracts with real estate brokering.

“I think I’ve always had an entrepreneurial spirit,” she said. “For years I was trying to figure out what I wanted to do. … I knew that even though I would have a broker’s license and a legal background, if I went to work for someone else I would not use both of those things. … It was a moment of clarity.”

Solo by choice

Indianapolis attorney Maura Hoff, like McAnlis, also credits a moment of clarity about her career with her decision to go solo.

After working for a small firm for four years, she decided she wanted to be “in charge of my own fate.”

A client had also suggested she open her own firm, and she felt that the timing was right. She met with small business advisors and opened her firm’s doors on Oct. 1, 2010. Her practice includes municipal law, business law, and zoning issues.

At the time she went solo, she was a municipal attorney for the city of Lawrence, and that hasn’t changed. When she met with an Indianapolis attorney she knew for advice, that attorney happened to have an extra office, which Hoff now sublets.

She said one of her reasons for opening her own practice was to have a good work-life balance, and it has “worked out better than I expected.”

She explained that she does work more hours than she did at a firm, but she enjoys the flexibility of being able to work from home and that she doesn’t need to be in an office by at a set time every day.

For young attorneys considering this move, Hoff suggested they get a good mentor, build their networks, and gain the confidence to work with clients.

Jeffersonville attorney Ken Doane also recently left a small firm to go out on his own. For Doane, it was a matter of changing practice areas that helped him decide to become a sole practitioner.

At the small firm, he practiced insurance defense but decided he would rather take on personal injury. He also accepts other cases through referrals.

“It’s been a challenging experience,” he said. “I don’t know how the new attorneys do it. I’ve been practicing for almost 15 years. I know the lay of the land with judges. Having been a partner, I know how the business end works. But it’s still been pretty challenging.”

Like many of his peers, Doane said he enjoys the autonomy and learning new things as a solo.

So far, whether solo by chance or by choice, none of these attorneys regret their career change to solo practice.

“I think that it has been more rewarding than I thought it was going to be. I think that people who are on the fence deciding whether or not to do it, should do it. I wasn’t going to do it, until I was pushed out of the nest,” McAnlis said.

“The worst day working for myself is comparable to the best day working for someone else,” she added.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Have been seeing this wonderful physician for a few years and was one of his patients who told him about what we were being told at CVS. Multiple ones. This was a witch hunt and they shold be ashamed of how patients were treated. Most of all, CVS should be ashamed for what they put this physician through. So thankful he fought back. His office is no "pill mill'. He does drug testing multiple times a year and sees patients a minimum of four times a year.

  2. Brian W, I fear I have not been sufficiently entertaining to bring you back. Here is a real laugh track that just might do it. When one is grabbed by the scruff of his worldview and made to choose between his Confession and his profession ... it is a not a hard choice, given the Confession affects eternity. But then comes the hardship in this world. Imagine how often I hear taunts like yours ... "what, you could not even pass character and fitness after they let you sit and pass their bar exam ... dude, there must really be something wrong with you!" Even one of the Bishop's foremost courtiers said that, when explaining why the RCC refused to stand with me. You want entertaining? How about watching your personal economy crash while you have a wife and five kids to clothe and feed. And you can't because you cannot work, because those demanding you cast off your Confession to be allowed into "their" profession have all the control. And you know that they are wrong, dead wrong, and that even the professional code itself allows your Faithful stand, to wit: "A lawyer may refuse to comply with an obligation imposed by law upon a good faith belief that no valid obligation exists. The provisions of Rule 1.2(d) concerning a good faith challenge to the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law apply to challenges of legal regulation of the practice of law." YET YOU ARE A NONPERSON before the BLE, and will not be heard on your rights or their duties to the law -- you are under tyranny, not law. And so they win in this world, you lose, and you lose even your belief in the rule of law, and demoralization joins poverty, and very troubling thoughts impeaching self worth rush in to fill the void where your career once lived. Thoughts you did not think possible. You find yourself a failure ... in your profession, in your support of your family, in the mirror. And there is little to keep hope alive, because tyranny rules so firmly and none, not the church, not the NGO's, none truly give a damn. Not even a new court, who pay such lip service to justice and ancient role models. You want entertainment? Well if you are on the side of the courtiers running the system that has crushed me, as I suspect you are, then Orwell must be a real riot: "There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always — do not forget this, Winston — always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever." I never thought they would win, I always thought that at the end of the day the rule of law would prevail. Yes, the rule of man's law. Instead power prevailed, so many rules broken by the system to break me. It took years, but, finally, the end that Dr Bowman predicted is upon me, the end that she advised the BLE to take to break me. Ironically, that is the one thing in her far left of center report that the BLE (after stamping, in red ink, on Jan 22) is uninterested in, as that the BLE and ADA office that used the federal statute as a sword now refuses to even dialogue on her dire prediction as to my fate. "C'est la vie" Entertaining enough for you, status quo defender?

  3. Low energy. Next!

  4. Had William Pryor made such provocative statements as a candidate for the Indiana bar he could have been blackballed as I have documented elsewhere on this ezine. That would have solved this huuuge problem for the Left and abortion industry the good old boy (and even girl) Indiana way. Note that Diane Sykes could have made a huuge difference, but she chose to look away like most all jurists who should certainly recognize a blatantly unconstitutional system when filed on their docket. See footnotes 1 & 2 here: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html Sykes and Kanne could have applied a well established exception to Rooker Feldman, but instead seemingly decided that was not available to conservative whistleblowers, it would seem. Just a loss and two nice footnotes to numb the pain. A few short years later Sykes ruled the very opposite on the RF question, just as she had ruled the very opposite on RF a few short years before. Indy and the abortion industry wanted me on the ground ... they got it. Thank God Alabama is not so corrupted! MAGA!!!

  5. OK, take notice. Those wondering just how corrupt the Indiana system is can see the picture in this post. Attorney Donald James did not criticize any judges, he merely, it would seem, caused some clients to file against him and then ignored his own defense. James thus disrespected the system via ignoring all and was also ordered to reimburse the commission $525.88 for the costs of prosecuting the first case against him. Yes, nearly $526 for all the costs, the state having proved it all. Ouch, right? Now consider whistleblower and constitutionalist and citizen journalist Paul Ogden who criticized a judge, defended himself in such a professional fashion as to have half the case against him thrown out by the ISC and was then handed a career ending $10,000 bill as "half the costs" of the state crucifying him. http://www.theindianalawyer.com/ogden-quitting-law-citing-high-disciplinary-fine/PARAMS/article/35323 THE TAKEAWAY MESSAGE for any who have ears to hear ... resist Star Chamber and pay with your career ... welcome to the Indiana system of (cough) justice.

ADVERTISEMENT