ILNews

Sun Capital execs 'shocked' by Marsh financials

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Any feelings of satisfaction that executives of Sun Capital Partners had after completing its acquisition of Marsh Supermarkets Inc. quickly turned to “shock and surprise,” a managing director of the private-equity firm told jurors Tuesday.

Sun Capital bought the locally based supermarket chain in 2006 and began paying longtime CEO Don Marsh a $4.2 million severance after the two parties agreed he would no longer remain with the business.

But Marsh Supermarkets, under the direction of Sun Capital, stopped paying Marsh after it says it discovered millions of dollars of travel expenses, some related to visits to mistresses, that he billed to the company.

Marsh’s trips, many of them via the company jet, are at the crux of a civil lawsuit brought by the supermarket chain. It accuses him of using company funds to pay more than $3 million in personal expenses. Marsh, 75, spent 38 years leading the public company before Sun bought it.

“We said, ‘This can’t be true that this went on,’” recalled Scott King, a managing director of Sun Capital. ‘What do we do?’”

What Marsh Supermarkets did was terminate its agreement with Don Marsh about 18 months after the sale, paying him just half his severance. After Marsh Supermarkets sued Don Marsh in federal court in 2009, he countersued, asserting the company improperly halted his post-retirement payouts in 2008.

The decision to halt payment weighed on Marsh Supermarkets, which spent more than a year investigating the company’s finances while worrying about any backlash it might suffer from bad press.

At the time, the iconic chain, founded by Don Marsh’s father in 1931, had more than 100 stores in Indiana, Illinois and Ohio. Moreover, Marsh was one of Indiana’s highest-profile executives for decades and frequently appeared in the company’s TV advertising.

“His last name’s on the building,” King said. “It could harm the business from a PR standpoint to have this out in the papers.”

Marsh Supermarkets ultimately chose to attempt to recoup the expenses from Marsh in court, because “it was not his money to spend; it was the shareholders',” King said.

Sun Capital, which specializes in acquiring companies with $50 million to $500 million in annual revenue, previously had not acquired a company as large as Marsh.

During cross-examination of King, Andrew McNeil, Don Marsh’s lawyer, questioned whether the acquisition was too big for Sun Capital. It took several months for the deal to close, rather than the 30 days it typically takes the private-equity firm to conclude a purchase.

Without Sun Capital, Marsh Supermarkets likely would have ended up in bankruptcy, King said. A former Marsh CFO told jurors Friday that he sought out bankruptcy lawyers for advice.

Sun Capital replaced Don Marsh with Frank Lazaran, a veteran supermarket executive who arrived to a CEO's office devoid of documents or files. He testified via deposition Tuesday that he didn’t understand Marsh Supermarkets’ e-voucher system used to track Don Marsh’s expenses.

“I'd never seen anything like it,” Lazaran said in his deposition.

Attorneys for Don Marsh defend the expenses, saying they were within the boundaries of his employment contract. And they say his extensive travels were justified to promote the company and stay on top of trends in food retailing.

Also testifying Tuesday morning was Patrick Calhoun, a former IRS special agent hired by the supermarket chain to look into Don Marsh's expenses from 1999 to 2006 and determine whether they were "ordinary and necessary."

Among the discoveries he discussed on the stand:

— $927,210 in "non-deductible outings" that were improperly expensed. Examples include taxidermy services and hunting licenses.

— $804,141 in costs for personal use of the company airplane, versus $906,997 for business use. After reviewing aircraft records, Calhoun determined that 47 percent of the flights were for personal business, far more than the 10 percent that Don Marsh reported.

Lawyers for Marsh Supermarkets are expected to wrap up their case against Don Marsh on Tuesday afternoon and could call David Marsh, Don Marsh’s son, as their last witness. David worked under his father as company president.

Marsh Supermarkets launched a legal fight against David in 2006 after he sued the company, alleging it shorted him $102,000 on his $2.1 million severance package. The company shot back that he had used the company “as his personal checkbook,” submitting expenses from family trips, and must repay more than $750,000. The parties reached a confidential settlement in 2007.

Don Marsh’s trial is expected to last two weeks and should conclude Friday.
 

Originally published in IBJ Daily, a sister publication of Indiana Lawyer.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Have been seeing this wonderful physician for a few years and was one of his patients who told him about what we were being told at CVS. Multiple ones. This was a witch hunt and they shold be ashamed of how patients were treated. Most of all, CVS should be ashamed for what they put this physician through. So thankful he fought back. His office is no "pill mill'. He does drug testing multiple times a year and sees patients a minimum of four times a year.

  2. Brian W, I fear I have not been sufficiently entertaining to bring you back. Here is a real laugh track that just might do it. When one is grabbed by the scruff of his worldview and made to choose between his Confession and his profession ... it is a not a hard choice, given the Confession affects eternity. But then comes the hardship in this world. Imagine how often I hear taunts like yours ... "what, you could not even pass character and fitness after they let you sit and pass their bar exam ... dude, there must really be something wrong with you!" Even one of the Bishop's foremost courtiers said that, when explaining why the RCC refused to stand with me. You want entertaining? How about watching your personal economy crash while you have a wife and five kids to clothe and feed. And you can't because you cannot work, because those demanding you cast off your Confession to be allowed into "their" profession have all the control. And you know that they are wrong, dead wrong, and that even the professional code itself allows your Faithful stand, to wit: "A lawyer may refuse to comply with an obligation imposed by law upon a good faith belief that no valid obligation exists. The provisions of Rule 1.2(d) concerning a good faith challenge to the validity, scope, meaning or application of the law apply to challenges of legal regulation of the practice of law." YET YOU ARE A NONPERSON before the BLE, and will not be heard on your rights or their duties to the law -- you are under tyranny, not law. And so they win in this world, you lose, and you lose even your belief in the rule of law, and demoralization joins poverty, and very troubling thoughts impeaching self worth rush in to fill the void where your career once lived. Thoughts you did not think possible. You find yourself a failure ... in your profession, in your support of your family, in the mirror. And there is little to keep hope alive, because tyranny rules so firmly and none, not the church, not the NGO's, none truly give a damn. Not even a new court, who pay such lip service to justice and ancient role models. You want entertainment? Well if you are on the side of the courtiers running the system that has crushed me, as I suspect you are, then Orwell must be a real riot: "There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always — do not forget this, Winston — always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever." I never thought they would win, I always thought that at the end of the day the rule of law would prevail. Yes, the rule of man's law. Instead power prevailed, so many rules broken by the system to break me. It took years, but, finally, the end that Dr Bowman predicted is upon me, the end that she advised the BLE to take to break me. Ironically, that is the one thing in her far left of center report that the BLE (after stamping, in red ink, on Jan 22) is uninterested in, as that the BLE and ADA office that used the federal statute as a sword now refuses to even dialogue on her dire prediction as to my fate. "C'est la vie" Entertaining enough for you, status quo defender?

  3. Low energy. Next!

  4. Had William Pryor made such provocative statements as a candidate for the Indiana bar he could have been blackballed as I have documented elsewhere on this ezine. That would have solved this huuuge problem for the Left and abortion industry the good old boy (and even girl) Indiana way. Note that Diane Sykes could have made a huuge difference, but she chose to look away like most all jurists who should certainly recognize a blatantly unconstitutional system when filed on their docket. See footnotes 1 & 2 here: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html Sykes and Kanne could have applied a well established exception to Rooker Feldman, but instead seemingly decided that was not available to conservative whistleblowers, it would seem. Just a loss and two nice footnotes to numb the pain. A few short years later Sykes ruled the very opposite on the RF question, just as she had ruled the very opposite on RF a few short years before. Indy and the abortion industry wanted me on the ground ... they got it. Thank God Alabama is not so corrupted! MAGA!!!

  5. OK, take notice. Those wondering just how corrupt the Indiana system is can see the picture in this post. Attorney Donald James did not criticize any judges, he merely, it would seem, caused some clients to file against him and then ignored his own defense. James thus disrespected the system via ignoring all and was also ordered to reimburse the commission $525.88 for the costs of prosecuting the first case against him. Yes, nearly $526 for all the costs, the state having proved it all. Ouch, right? Now consider whistleblower and constitutionalist and citizen journalist Paul Ogden who criticized a judge, defended himself in such a professional fashion as to have half the case against him thrown out by the ISC and was then handed a career ending $10,000 bill as "half the costs" of the state crucifying him. http://www.theindianalawyer.com/ogden-quitting-law-citing-high-disciplinary-fine/PARAMS/article/35323 THE TAKEAWAY MESSAGE for any who have ears to hear ... resist Star Chamber and pay with your career ... welcome to the Indiana system of (cough) justice.

ADVERTISEMENT