ILNews

Supreme Court case may resolve conflicting misdemeanor probation readings

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Supreme Court will hear a case in which the Court of Appeals on rehearing noted conflicting interpretations of the maximum probation sentence for people convicted of misdemeanors.

The court accepted transfer of Joey Jennings v. State of Indiana 53A01-1010-CR-541. Jennings was convicted of a Class B misdemeanor for which he was sentenced to the maximum 180 days in prison with 30 days executed, 150 suspended and 360 days of probation.

The appeals court ruled, and affirmed unanimously on rehearing, that the sentence violated I.C. 35-50-3-1(b) (2004), which provides that when a court suspends any portion of a misdemeanor sentence, “it may place the person on probation . . . for a fixed period of not more than one (1) year, notwithstanding the maximum term of imprisonment for the misdemeanor. … However, the combined term of imprisonment and probation for a misdemeanor may not exceed one (1) year.”   

The appeals court held that “term of imprisonment” includes both the time executed and the suspended portion of a sentence, so Jennings’ probation could not exceed 185 days.

The state sought appeal to the Supreme Court, citing the court’s ruling in Smith v. State, 621 N.E.2d 325 (Ind. 1993). There, the justices ruled that a court may suspend a sentence in whole or part to place a defendant on probation so long as the combination of the executed sentence and probationary period do not exceed the maximum statutory sentence for an offense.

The Jennings case was the sole case to which the justices voted to grant transfer for the week ending Sept. 21. Transfer was denied in 17 cases. The transfer disposition list may be viewed here.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Based on several recent Indy Star articles, I would agree that being a case worker would be really hard. You would see the worst of humanity on a daily basis; and when things go wrong guess who gets blamed??!! Not biological parent!! Best of luck to those who entered that line of work.

  2. I was looking through some of your blog posts on this internet site and I conceive this web site is rattling informative ! Keep on posting . dfkcfdkdgbekdffe

  3. Don't believe me, listen to Pacino: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6bC9w9cH-M

  4. Law school is social control the goal to produce a social product. As such it began after the Revolution and has nearly ruined us to this day: "“Scarcely any political question arises in the United States which is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. Hence all parties are obliged to borrow, in their daily controversies, the ideas, and even the language, peculiar to judicial proceedings. As most public men [i.e., politicians] are, or have been, legal practitioners, they introduce the customs and technicalities of their profession into the management of public affairs. The jury extends this habitude to all classes. The language of the law thus becomes, in some measure, a vulgar tongue; the spirit of the law, which is produced in the schools and courts of justice, gradually penetrates beyond their walls into the bosom of society, where it descends to the lowest classes, so that at last the whole people contract the habits and the tastes of the judicial magistrate.” ? Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

  5. Attorney? Really? Or is it former attorney? Status with the Ind St Ct? Status with federal court, with SCOTUS? This is a legal newspaper, or should I look elsewhere?

ADVERTISEMENT