Indiana Supreme Court justices unanimously voted to grant a permanent writ of mandamus and prohibition in a case out of Howard
Superior Court.
Relators Jeffrey Scott Bousum and Regina Lee Bousum alleged Judge Stephen M. Jessup of Howard Superior Court 2 failed to
rule on motions for summary judgment within the Trial Rule 53.1 time limits after a hearing on those motions. They also allege
trial court clerk Mona L. Myers failed in her duty to withdraw the case from the trial court upon the filing of the relators'
praecipe and to transmit the case to the Supreme Court for the appointment of a special judge.
In the order from Wednesday, the Supreme Court directed Judge Jessup to vacate any orders or judgment issued after the filing
of the praecipe on June 1, 2009, and to stop exercising jurisdiction over the case except for administrative tasks needed
to execute the writ. Clerk Myers is to give written notice to the judge and the Supreme Court that the submission of the case
has been withdrawn.
The judge must also file a written report pursuant to Trial Rules 53.1(F) and 53.2(F) once the clerk complies with Trial
Rule 53.1(E)(2) and the high court issues an order appointing a special judge. The writ is effective immediately.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.