ILNews

Supreme Court, Legislature leave police body camera statute as is

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
camera002-15col.jpg Indiana’s new police body camera law, which took effect July 2016, provides guidance on storing and releasing video. (IL file photo)

Indiana prosecutors’ concerns that they could face disciplinary proceedings if they release police body camera video will likely remain unalleviated by either the Statehouse or the Indiana Supreme Court.

Recently, court administrators and public officials met to discuss the body camera law passed by the Indiana General Assembly that took effect July 2016.

key-steve-mug Key

Hoosier State Press Association Executive Director Steve Key, who coordinated the meeting, was hoping the Supreme Court would allow the Disciplinary Commission to give an advisory opinion about the new law. However, the general consensus was to give the law more time to work before the Supreme Court or the Legislature takes any action.

Key said he wishes the concerns could be addressed now but he conceded the law is still very new and no problems have been reported with its implementation.

“If we can’t show the process is not working, then we can’t expect the Legislature to jump out there and say we need to make this change,” he said.

House Enrolled Act 1019 establishes policy for law enforcement agencies in Indiana on how long to store body camera video and who can see it. The law, authored by Rep. Kevin Mahan, R-Hartford City, was the product of an interim study committee and picked up bipartisan support in the Statehouse.

Yet after the bill was passed, the Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council said its members were worried that releasing the video before a criminal case was completed would violate Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct 3.6 and 3.8.

IPAC Executive Director David Powell was at the meeting with court officials but he could not be reached for comment.

“I’m disappointed that this issue didn’t emerge during the legislative process when maybe it could have been address at that time,” Key said.

bray-rodrick-mug.jpg Bray

Sen. Rodric Bray, R-Martinsville, said he is not sure the Rules of Professional Conduct “completely conflict with the law.” Specifically, he pointed to the language now included in Indiana Code 5-14-3-5.2 that outlines the conditions for releasing the video. He said the law’s provision tracks closely to Rules 3.6 and 3.8 that focus on ensuring a fair trial, which should help address some of the prosecutors’ concerns.

Bray, an attorney, was a sponsor of the body camera legislation and attended the meeting with Key, Powell and the court officials.

Indiana Supreme Court Chief Administrator Mary Willis, who also participated in the meeting, echoed the senator. She said the legislation was “well drafted” and provided a remedy for the prosecutors’ concerns. Namely, the state attorneys can ask for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the video should be released.

willis-mary-mug.jpg Willis

She conceded that provision could not shield all prosecutors from a disciplinary complaint. But because the concerns are still hypothetical, Willis said, “At this time the court does not anticipate any guidance being issued.”

Calling the meeting “pretty productive,” Bray emphasized the Legislature has to be careful to not overstep the separation of powers and encroach into the judiciary’s territory. The General Assembly cannot pass a law that impacts the rules of the court, he said, but the Statehouse and the judicial branch need to work together so as not to send mixed messages.

A fix for the law is difficult since at this time, it is still rather new and apparently has not yet been tested in court. Key did an informal survey of HSPA members and found no one had been denied access to the videos or knew of anyone who had been denied access. As he noted, there is not a body of evidence indicating the statute needs to be changed.

Still, he said it doesn’t matter whether the courts or the Legislature addresses the concerns. The point is to not have prosecutors always saying no to the release of video because they want to avoid any potential disciplinary action.

Bray does not believe the Rules of Professional Conduct will be used to prevent the release of all body camera videos. The goal of the bill was to improve transparency, but he wants to see how the law plays out before tinkering with it.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. OK, take notice. Those wondering just how corrupt the Indiana system is can see the picture in this post. Attorney Donald James did not criticize any judges, he merely, it would seem, caused some clients to file against him and then ignored his own defense. James thus disrespected the system via ignoring all and was also ordered to reimburse the commission $525.88 for the costs of prosecuting the first case against him. Yes, nearly $526 for all the costs, the state having proved it all. Ouch, right? Now consider whistleblower and constitutionalist and citizen journalist Paul Ogden who criticized a judge, defended himself in such a professional fashion as to have half the case against him thrown out by the ISC and was then handed a career ending $10,000 bill as "half the costs" of the state crucifying him. http://www.theindianalawyer.com/ogden-quitting-law-citing-high-disciplinary-fine/PARAMS/article/35323 THE TAKEAWAY MESSAGE for any who have ears to hear ... resist Star Chamber and pay with your career ... welcome to the Indiana system of (cough) justice.

  2. GMA Ranger, I, too, was warned against posting on how the Ind govt was attempting to destroy me professionally, and visit great costs and even destitution upon my family through their processing. No doubt the discussion in Indy today is likely how to ban me from this site (I expect I soon will be), just as they have banned me from emailing them at the BLE and Office of Bar Admission and ADA coordinator -- or, if that fails, whether they can file a complaint against my Kansas or SCOTUS law license for telling just how they operate and offering all of my files over the past decade to any of good will. The elitist insiders running the Hoosier social control mechanisms realize that knowledge and a unified response will be the end of their unjust reign. They fear exposure and accountability. I was banned for life from the Indiana bar for questioning government processing, that is, for being a whistleblower. Hoosier whistleblowers suffer much. I have no doubt, Gma Ranger, of what you report. They fear us, but realize as long as they keep us in fear of them, they can control us. Kinda like the kids' show Ants. Tyrannical governments the world over are being shaken by empowered citizens. Hoosiers dealing with The Capitol are often dealing with tyranny. Time to rise up: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jan/17/governments-struggling-to-retain-trust-of-citizens-global-survey-finds Back to the Founders! MAGA!

  3. Science is showing us the root of addiction is the lack of connection (with people). Criminalizing people who are lonely is a gross misinterpretation of what data is revealing and the approach we must take to combat mental health. Harsher crimes from drug dealers? where there is a demand there is a market, so make it legal and encourage these citizens to be functioning members of a society with competitive market opportunities. Legalize are "drugs" and quit wasting tax payer dollars on frivolous incarceration. The system is destroying lives and doing it in the name of privatized profits. To demonize loneliness and destroy lives in the land of opportunity is not freedom.

  4. Good luck, but as I have documented in three Hail Mary's to the SCOTUS, two applications (2007 & 2013),a civil rights suit and my own kicked-to-the-curb prayer for mandamus. all supported in detailed affidavits with full legal briefing (never considered), the ISC knows that the BLE operates "above the law" (i.e. unconstitutionally) and does not give a damn. In fact, that is how it was designed to control the lawyers. IU Law Prof. Patrick Baude blew the whistle while he was Ind Bar Examiner President back in 1993, even he was shut down. It is a masonic system that blackballs those whom the elite disdain. Here is the basic thrust:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackballing When I asked why I was initially denied, the court's foremost jester wrote back that the ten examiners all voted, and I did not gain the needed votes for approval (whatever that is, probably ten) and thus I was not in .. nothing written, no explanation, just go away or appeal ... and if you appeal and disagree with their system .. proof positive you lack character and fitness. It is both arbitrary and capricious by its very design. The Hoosier legal elites are monarchical minded, and rejected me for life for ostensibly failing to sufficiently respect man's law (due to my stated regard for God's law -- which they questioned me on, after remanding me for a psych eval for holding such Higher Law beliefs) while breaking their own rules, breaking federal statutory law, and violating federal and state constitutions and ancient due process standards .. all well documented as they "processed me" over many years.... yes years ... they have few standards that they will not bulldoze to get to the end desired. And the ISC knows this, and they keep it in play. So sad, And the fed courts refuse to do anything, and so the blackballing show goes on ... it is the Indy way. My final experience here: https://www.scribd.com/document/299040062/Brown-ind-Bar-memo-Pet-cert I will open my files to anyone interested in seeing justice dawn over Indy. My cases are an open book, just ask.

  5. Looks like 2017 will be another notable year for these cases. I have a Grandson involved in a CHINS case that should never have been. He and the whole family are being held hostage by CPS and the 'current mood' of the CPS caseworker. If the parents disagree with a decision, they are penalized. I, along with other were posting on Jasper County Online News, but all were quickly warned to remove posts. I totally understand that some children need these services, but in this case, it was mistakes, covered by coorcement of father to sign papers, lies and cover-ups. The most astonishing thing was within 2 weeks of this child being placed with CPS, a private adoption agency was asking questions regarding child's family in the area. I believe a photo that was taken by CPS manager at the very onset during the CHINS co-ocerment and the intent was to make money. I have even been warned not to post or speak to anyone regarding this case. Parents have completed all requirements, met foster parents, get visitation 2 days a week, and still the next court date is all the way out till May 1, which gives them(CPS) plenty of to time make further demands (which I expect) No trust of these 'seasoned' case managers, as I have already learned too much about their dirty little tricks. If they discover that I have posted here, I expect they will not be happy and penalized parents again. Still a Hostage.

ADVERTISEMENT