The Indiana Supreme Court is teaming up with the state’s Public Broadcasting Service to offer specials informing residents
about the court system.
The programs will cover a variety of topics including pro se representation, the importance of jury service, alternative
dispute resolution, and will also include several Indiana Supreme Court oral arguments. The videos will begin airing Thursday.
Indiana Supreme Court public information officer Kathryn Dolan said the programs are part of a new partnership between PBS
and the Supreme Court and there will be others offered in the future. The programs in this series are the same that are available
online on the court’s website. Dolan said the Supreme Court is pleased that PBS will be offering a new audience for
the videos.
All eight Indiana PBS stations will offer the programming, although not all of their schedules have been updated to include
the series. The first program set to air Thursday is “Family Matters: Choosing to Represent Yourself in Court.”
Indiana Trial Lawyers Association, Indiana Paralegal Association, Indiana State Bar Association, Indiana Supreme Court, and
the Corporation for Public Broadcasting provided funding for the series.
on Facebook & Twitter
Back to Top
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...