ILNews

Suspended judge faces disciplinary charges

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications has filed charges against the suspended LaPorte Superior judge who was shot in the head just before taking the bench this year.

The Judicial Qualifications Commission has charged Judge Jennifer Evans Koethe with three counts: violating Canon 2A of the 2008 Judicial Code of Conduct and Rule 1.2 of the 2009 Judicial Code of Conduct for withholding or misrepresenting pertinent information during taped statements with officials; violating Canons 1 and 2A of the 2008 code for asking a police officer destroy a handwritten note that was potential evidence in an official investigation; and violating Rules 8.4(b), (c), and (d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct by asking the officer to destroy the note.

Judge Koethe was the elected judge for Superior 3 when she was grazed in the head by a bullet from her 9mm handgun in late December 2008. At first, the judge said she accidentally shot herself and didn't know where the gun was. She later told a detective at the hospital that she put the gun to her head to scare her husband into thinking was going to kill herself, but she didn't know the gun was loaded when she fired it. She also told the detective she wrote a note to her husband on the back of a store box and asked him to get rid of it.

Judge Koethe deliberately omitted from her Dec. 23 statement that she went into the bedroom and wrote her husband a personal note before getting the gun. In her Jan. 9 statement, she contradicted statements from her Dec. 23 statement, including she thought the gun was unloaded because she removed the bullets from it, denying she put the gun up to her head, and instead said it accidentally went off when she picked the gun up off the bed. She then denied knowing about the location of the gun or the note.

Her husband, Stephan, admitted he hid the gun and the note when his wife was in the room.

The judge was indicted for attempted obstruction of justice as a Class D felony in May and has been suspended with pay since May 11, earning nearly $74,000 while off the bench. Her trial is scheduled for Jan. 4, 2010, before Special Judge Thomas Stefaniak of Lake Superior Court. According to Supreme Court spokesperson Kathryn Dolan, Judge Koethe is the first judge charged with a felony in Indiana since the 1980s.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Just an aside, but regardless of the outcome, I 'm proud of Judge William Hughes. He was the original magistrate on the Home place issue. He ruled for Home Place, and was primaried by Brainard for it. Their tool Poindexter failed to unseat Hughes, who won support for his honesty and courage throughout the county, and he was reelected Judge of Hamilton County's Superior Court. You can still stand for something and survive. Thanks, Judge Hughes!

  2. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  3. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  4. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  5. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

ADVERTISEMENT