ILNews

Talk to a Lawyer Today includes 3 dozen sites

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

While many attorneys get a day off of work today because courts, government offices, banks, and many businesses are closed to honor the birthday of Martin Luther King Jr., more than 200 lawyers have volunteered to spend two hours answering legal questions from the public as part of the Indiana State Bar Association’s 10th annual Talk to a Lawyer Today event.

This year, the event includes three dozen walk-in sites around Indiana, plus a handful of call-in sites, including two call-in sites in Indianapolis (one in English and one in Spanish) where attorneys will answer questions from callers from around the state.

In the past, callers have asked about issues concerning family law, particularly child support and custody; criminal law; and consumer law, such as bankruptcy and other debt issues. Organizers expect a similar mix today.

One of the TTALT’s organizers who has been involved since the planning stages for the first TTALT event in 2002, Indianapolis attorney Patricia McKinnon, said more than 200 volunteers were participating this year. She said more than 1,000 attorneys have volunteered since the program started.

All but two pro bono districts have set up TTALT call-in or walk-in sites for this year, McKinnon said.

However, she added, attorney and State Sen. Randall Head (R-Logansport) has helped facilitate two call-in sites in one of those districts, District 5. One call-in site is the office of Miami Superior Judge J. David Grund, and the other is the office of Rochester attorney Danny Seitz.

Most participating districts have one or two walk-in or call-in sites. However, District 1 has about a dozen walk-in sites run by volunteer attorneys in the district that serves northwest Indiana counties, and District 6 has walk-in sites in Delaware, Grant, Henry and Madison counties.

Most of the sites are listed on the ISBA’s website.

Compared with the early years of the program, McKinnon said she has noticed an increase in the number of attorneys who volunteer in the last couple years.

In fact, this year Laurie Beltz Boyd, plan administrator for Heartland Pro Bono Council, which coordinates volunteers for the call in site at the ISBA offices in Indianapolis, said she started a waiting list for volunteers.

McKinnon thanked ISBA president Jeffry Lind for his help in promoting the event, including a 6:30 a.m. interview on WISH-TV in Indianapolis. She said he drove from Terre Haute to downtown Indianapolis for the interview, then headed back to Terre Haute to get to work.

“This year more than ever, attorneys needed to step up and help out the public reeling from the economic blow of the last few years. And they did so,” she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hmmmmm ..... How does the good doctor's spells work on tyrants and unelected bureacrats with nearly unchecked power employing in closed hearings employing ad hoc procedures? Just askin'. ... Happy independence day to any and all out there who are "free" ... Unlike me.

  2. Today, I want to use this opportunity to tell everyone about Dr agbuza of agbuzaodera(at)gmail. com, on how he help me reunited with my husband after 2 months of divorce.My husband divorce me because he saw another woman in his office and he said to me that he is no longer in love with me anymore and decide to divorce me.I seek help from the Net and i saw good talk about Dr agbuza and i contact him and explain my problem to him and he cast a spell for me which i use to get my husband back within 2 days.am totally happy because there is no reparations and side-effect. If you need his help Email him at agbuzaodera(at)gmail. com

  3. The practitioners and judges who hail E-filing as the Saviour of the West need to contain their respective excitements. E-filing is federal court requires the practitioner to cram his motion practice into pigeonholes created by IT people. Compound motions or those seeking alternative relief are effectively barred, unless the practitioner wants to receive a tart note from some functionary admonishing about the "problem". E-filing is just another method by which courts and judges transfer their burden to practitioners, who are the really the only powerless components of the system. Of COURSE it is easier for the court to require all of its imput to conform to certain formats, but this imposition does NOT improve the quality of the practice of law and does NOT improve the ability of the practitioner to advocate for his client or to fashion pleadings that exactly conform to his client's best interests. And we should be very wary of the disingenuous pablum about the costs. The courts will find a way to stick it to the practitioner. Lake County is a VERY good example of this rapaciousness. Any one who does not believe this is invited to review the various special fees that system imposes upon practitioners- as practitioners- and upon each case ON TOP of the court costs normal in every case manually filed. Jurisprudence according to Aldous Huxley.

  4. Any attorneys who practice in federal court should be able to say the same as I can ... efiling is great. I have been doing it in fed court since it started way back. Pacer has its drawbacks, but the ability to hit an e-docket and pull up anything and everything onscreen is a huge plus for a litigator, eps the sole practitioner, who lacks a filing clerk and the paralegal support of large firms. Were I an Indiana attorney I would welcome this great step forward.

  5. Can we get full disclosure on lobbyist's payments to legislatures such as Mr Buck? AS long as there are idiots that are disrespectful of neighbors and intent on shooting fireworks every night, some kind of regulations are needed.

ADVERTISEMENT