In Indiana, a person adopted pre-emancipation can't be considered a Class A transferee beneficiary for inheritance tax
purposes, the Indiana Tax Court ruled Thursday afternoon in an issue of first impression.
In In Re The estate of Forrest W. Quackenbush, deceased, et al. v. Indiana Department of Revenue, Inheritance
Tax Division, No. 49T10-0810-TA-61, Forrest Quackenbush's estate appealed the decision by the Tippecanoe
Circuit Court determining its inheritance tax liability. The case raises an issue of first impression in whether, for inheritance
tax purposes, a beneficiary should be classified as Class A or Class C transferee when she was adopted pre-emancipation during
the lifetime of her biological grandfather.
Quackenbush included his biological granddaughter Pamela Stewart Martin and her two children in his trust. The estate treated
the three as Class A transferees when filing its inheritance tax return, which the probate court accepted. But the inheritance
tax division filed a petition for rehearing, during which the probate court later determined Martin and her sons should have
been classified as Class C transferees, which increased the estate's inheritance tax liability.
The estate argued that nothing in I.C. Section 6-4.1-1-3 or inheritance tax statutes prevents an adoptee from being treated
both as a lineal descendant of a natural ancestor and as the natural child of her adoptive parents for inheritance tax purposes.
The Tax Court disagreed after examining the interrelationship between the state's descent and devise statutes and its
inheritance statutes.
"The overall design of Indiana's probate code with respect to the distribution of property is to treat an adopted
child as the natural child of the adoptive parents only," wrote Judge Thomas Fisher.
The General Assembly has unambiguously determined for purposes of inheritance, a child adopted pre-emancipation by unrelated
individuals should be placed in a family status equal to that of a natural child of those adoptive parents only, the judge
continued. Martin's biological ties to her natural parents were legally severed.
"The Court, having considered Indiana Code § 6-4.1-1-3 in relation to the aforementioned adoption and descent and
devise statutes, concludes that the probate court correctly determined that the legislature did not intend to confer Class
A transferee status to Pamela, Miles, or Matthias," wrote Judge Fisher.














Interesting that the new laws in criminal code all involve voter fraud
I'm getting divorced and we have prenuptial and judge said it stands even though he made me sign it 2 days before wedding then I be c ame ill and left with nothing butbills
No irony here, John. Conour’s clients are wise to him. Evidently you’ve missed discovery that disclosed Conour was aware he was caught with his hand in the cookie jar, actually many cookie jars, but continued to spend any monies he secured on himself and his lifestyle. Your theory is idealistic and assumes Conour has the soul of a good attorney and therefore he would take care of his clients. Conour has no soul. He greedily took awarded settlements from his disabled clients and spent it on his own edacious desires. You are naïve to think if he kept working he would put his fees into a restitution fund. He is who he is and has proven he will use any means to cheat and manipulate those who trust him and the judicial system that is supposed to protect them. Sorry John, you don’t send the fox back into the hen house after he’s caught devouring the hens. Conour can’t be trusted. He has no more honor than that fox.
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution