ILNews

Teachers will have civics lesson at Indiana Statehouse

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Supreme Court, the International Association of Defense Counsel and the Indiana Bar Foundation are collaborating to present a workshop for Indiana teachers April 13.

Courts in the Classroom will host teachers from around the state from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. at the Indiana Statehouse. Last November, then-Indiana Supreme Court Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard asked more than 600 Indiana judges and lawyers to nominate teachers from their community to attend the event. A total of 186 nominations were submitted, and 101 teachers are registered for the conference.

The workshop will introduce teachers and administrators from schools throughout Indiana to civic education materials and iCivics.org, a web-based education project started by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor to reinvigorate civic learning.  
Workshop sessions will showcase the free resources available at iCivics.org and highlight how the curriculum is aligned with Indiana’s social studies standards. Participants will hear teacher testimonials, familiarize themselves with iCivics materials, interact and have lunch with Indiana judges and lawyers, and create lesson plans. In addition, representatives from other Indiana civic education organizations will be present during the day to answer questions and distribute materials.

The program has been made possible through a matching grant from Indiana Humanities in cooperation with the National Endowment for the Humanities.

To learn more about future interactive learning events, including how to register for a program, contact Elizabeth R. Osborn at elizabeth.osborn@courts.in.gov or by phone at 317-233-8682.

More information about the workshop is available online.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The practitioners and judges who hail E-filing as the Saviour of the West need to contain their respective excitements. E-filing is federal court requires the practitioner to cram his motion practice into pigeonholes created by IT people. Compound motions or those seeking alternative relief are effectively barred, unless the practitioner wants to receive a tart note from some functionary admonishing about the "problem". E-filing is just another method by which courts and judges transfer their burden to practitioners, who are the really the only powerless components of the system. Of COURSE it is easier for the court to require all of its imput to conform to certain formats, but this imposition does NOT improve the quality of the practice of law and does NOT improve the ability of the practitioner to advocate for his client or to fashion pleadings that exactly conform to his client's best interests. And we should be very wary of the disingenuous pablum about the costs. The courts will find a way to stick it to the practitioner. Lake County is a VERY good example of this rapaciousness. Any one who does not believe this is invited to review the various special fees that system imposes upon practitioners- as practitioners- and upon each case ON TOP of the court costs normal in every case manually filed. Jurisprudence according to Aldous Huxley.

  2. Any attorneys who practice in federal court should be able to say the same as I can ... efiling is great. I have been doing it in fed court since it started way back. Pacer has its drawbacks, but the ability to hit an e-docket and pull up anything and everything onscreen is a huge plus for a litigator, eps the sole practitioner, who lacks a filing clerk and the paralegal support of large firms. Were I an Indiana attorney I would welcome this great step forward.

  3. Can we get full disclosure on lobbyist's payments to legislatures such as Mr Buck? AS long as there are idiots that are disrespectful of neighbors and intent on shooting fireworks every night, some kind of regulations are needed.

  4. I am the mother of the child in this case. My silence on the matter was due to the fact that I filed, both in Illinois and Indiana, child support cases. I even filed supporting documentation with the Indiana family law court. Not sure whether this information was provided to the court of appeals or not. Wish the case was done before moving to Indiana, because no matter what, there is NO WAY the state of Illinois would have allowed an appeal on a child support case!

  5. "No one is safe when the Legislature is in session."

ADVERTISEMENT