ILNews

Teamwork at IHSAA

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
In-House Counsel

A large animal skull sits on top of a bureau in the corner of Robert M. Baker III’s office. “That’s a replica of a saber-toothed tiger from the La Brea Tar Pits. I thought it fit – we were doing lots of litigation at the time,” Baker said wryly.

Baker, in-house counsel for the Indiana High School Athletic Association, has represented the non-profit organization in more than 100 lawsuits in more than half of Indiana’s counties and in the state’s federal District courts. He began representing IHSAA in 1988.

“Back in the ’80s, they were sued all the time,” Baker said. And his successful litigation of IHSAA cases led to his appointment as in-house counsel for the association in 2006.

IHSAA baker Robert M. Baker III has litigated hundreds of sports-related cases. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Baker had been a partner at four firms before joining the IHSAA, and he brought with him a broad background in business, commercial, and tort litigation. Blake Ress, who was IHSAA commissioner from 2000 until his retirement early this year, talked about how Baker’s extensive background was a great fit for the association’s needs.

“During my tenure as IHSAA commissioner, it was really important and invaluable to have legal counsel like Bob Baker whom you trusted and who had the institutional knowledge that can only be present after years of experience,” Ress said.

Nowadays, Baker spends less time in court than he did in the 1980s. He said lawsuits have decreased in the time he has represented the IHSAA, due in part to the creation of a case review panel. Before the 2000 Legislature ordered the creation of the CRP, students could appeal IHSAA rulings by either approaching the association’s in-house review committee or filing a lawsuit. The CRP, chaired by the superintendent of public instruction, hears appeals from students who are dissatisfied with the results of an IHSAA in-house hearing.

A decrease in court cases, however, does not mean less work for Baker, who also runs a solo practice from his IHSAA office.

He said he generally spends his day meeting with IHSAA executives and advising them about legal issues. He may be asked to review sponsorship agreements, draft contracts for new venues, or answer questions about IHSAA’s many rules, which he helped draft. The largest part of his work is devoted to enforcing IHSAA’s school-transfer policies.

“Indiana – in a year – will have 3,500 or 3,600 transfers. The lion’s share of those will be because mom and dad have moved,” he said.

Of the transfers they see each year, Baker explained that about a half to two-thirds are because a family has moved. But if the IHSAA determines the transfer was motivated by athletic reasons, the student may face limited eligibility – like being allowed to participate in only junior varsity sports. The policy is similar to one used by the National Collegiate Athletic Association.

“The protocol that the IHSAA uses is the same as the NCAA, only the NCAA isn’t able to enforce limited eligibility as the IHSAA does because there are no JV teams in the NCAA,” he said.

A small number of transfers – perhaps 10 to 15 per year – result in revoked athletic eligibility for one year at the new school, Baker said.

When a student transfers, the new school submits a transfer report to the IHSAA, where three assistant commissioners review the report and make a ruling on eligibility. If the family appeals the IHSAA’s decision, “That’s when I get involved,” he said.

One reason the IHSAA diligently tracks transfers is because the association wants to make sure students have their priorities in order.

“I mean, you go to school to get an education,” Baker said. “So if kids transfer for athletic reasons, they’re subordinating their education.”

The IHSAA also enforces transfer policies to ensure that no school is able to recruit the state’s best student athletes. “There are perennial good teams that students may want to play for,” he said.

Baker also is watchful for violations of other IHSAA rules. “The 8-semester rule – once you’ve gone eight semesters, you’re done. And once you become 19, you’re ineligible. We’d have 19-year-olds playing against 14-year-olds,” he said. “There’s a point where you have to say, ‘enough is enough.’”

He is also in charge of enforcing IHSAA’s intellectual property rights – like making sure photographers at IHSAA events have proper credentials and that amateur photographers aren’t snapping pictures and selling them for profit.

One commissioner oversees the 8,000 high school athletic officials in the state, and the commissioner may turn to Baker for advice. Baker also meets regularly with the IHSAA’s legislative lobbyist. “There is certain legislation that is directed at us,” he said.

Baker said he thinks the association’s reputation is improving.

“IHSAA used to be perceived as heavy-handed or autocratic,” he said. And part of that perception could have been because the plaintiffs in cases against the IHSAA are generally students.

“Anytime you are dealing with a young adult, there’s going to be an inclination for sympathy with their position,” he said.

This year, the IHSAA was a defendant in a case where plaintiffs alleged violation of Title IX rights. Title IX, enacted by the U.S. Department of Education in 1972, states, in part, that sports participation opportunities for male and female students should be substantially proportionate to their enrollment. The plaintiffs – who contend that scheduling girls basketball games on weeknights is discriminatory – voluntarily dropped IHSAA as a defendant. The case is now under consideration in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Schools are responsible for ensuring compliance with Title IX, Baker said. The IHSAA wrote a letter to its member schools about 10 years ago, he added, reminding them about the DOE guidelines regarding Title IX.

“There are constant challenges that the association goes through,” Baker said. “Right now, I don’t see anything that says, ‘Let’s brace ourselves for this.’”

The policies that Baker has helped create may protect the association from litigation. Its lightning policy, for example, lists guidelines stating when coaches, officials, or trainers should call off an event due to threat of a lightning strike. If those guidelines are not followed, the school is liable for any lightning-related injuries. Only during IHSAA tournaments would the association be held liable for injuries resulting from failure to follow its own guidelines.

Baker, 60, has two grown children who participated in high school sports. “I had two jocks – a boy jock, and a girl jock,” he said. The attorney does not put himself in the same category. “In high school, I did swim. I was also a sports editor … so, I wasn’t a jock.”

He coached baseball from the time his son was 4 years old (the age at which every child should begin playing baseball, he said). Even so, he downplayed his role, “I was more of an assistant coach,” he said.

When asked why he chose to become a lawyer, Baker paused a moment to reflect.

“I think it was the idea of going into a vocation where I could talk, and I truly enjoyed the intellectual challenges of it.” In the early 1970s, he said, “It made sense to continue educating myself,” rather than try to enter the job market.

Baker said he has always been interested in high school sports, and he appreciates that the IHSAA staff seems deeply committed to the work they do.

“Being general counsel and actually working here is one of the fun parts of practicing law. Working with these folks is a joy,” he said.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Good luck, but as I have documented in three Hail Mary's to the SCOTUS, two applications (2007 & 2013),a civil rights suit and my own kicked-to-the-curb prayer for mandamus. all supported in detailed affidavits with full legal briefing (never considered), the ISC knows that the BLE operates "above the law" (i.e. unconstitutionally) and does not give a damn. In fact, that is how it was designed to control the lawyers. IU Law Prof. Patrick Baude blew the whistle while he was Ind Bar Examiner President back in 1993, even he was shut down. It is a masonic system that blackballs those whom the elite disdain. Here is the basic thrust:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackballing When I asked why I was initially denied, the court's foremost jester wrote back that the ten examiners all voted, and I did not gain the needed votes for approval (whatever that is, probably ten) and thus I was not in .. nothing written, no explanation, just go away or appeal ... and if you appeal and disagree with their system .. proof positive you lack character and fitness. It is both arbitrary and capricious by its very design. The Hoosier legal elites are monarchical minded, and rejected me for life for ostensibly failing to sufficiently respect man's law (due to my stated regard for God's law -- which they questioned me on, after remanding me for a psych eval for holding such Higher Law beliefs) while breaking their own rules, breaking federal statutory law, and violating federal and state constitutions and ancient due process standards .. all well documented as they "processed me" over many years.... yes years ... they have few standards that they will not bulldoze to get to the end desired. And the ISC knows this, and they keep it in play. So sad, And the fed courts refuse to do anything, and so the blackballing show goes on ... it is the Indy way. My final experience here: https://www.scribd.com/document/299040062/Brown-ind-Bar-memo-Pet-cert I will open my files to anyone interested in seeing justice dawn over Indy. My cases are an open book, just ask.

  2. Looks like 2017 will be another notable year for these cases. I have a Grandson involved in a CHINS case that should never have been. He and the whole family are being held hostage by CPS and the 'current mood' of the CPS caseworker. If the parents disagree with a decision, they are penalized. I, along with other were posting on Jasper County Online News, but all were quickly warned to remove posts. I totally understand that some children need these services, but in this case, it was mistakes, covered by coorcement of father to sign papers, lies and cover-ups. The most astonishing thing was within 2 weeks of this child being placed with CPS, a private adoption agency was asking questions regarding child's family in the area. I believe a photo that was taken by CPS manager at the very onset during the CHINS co-ocerment and the intent was to make money. I have even been warned not to post or speak to anyone regarding this case. Parents have completed all requirements, met foster parents, get visitation 2 days a week, and still the next court date is all the way out till May 1, which gives them(CPS) plenty of to time make further demands (which I expect) No trust of these 'seasoned' case managers, as I have already learned too much about their dirty little tricks. If they discover that I have posted here, I expect they will not be happy and penalized parents again. Still a Hostage.

  3. They say it was a court error, however they fail to mention A.R. was on the run from the law and was hiding. Thus why she didn't receive anything from her public defender. Step mom is filing again for adoption of the two boys she has raised. A.R. is a criminal with a serious heroin addiction. She filed this appeal MORE than 30 days after the final decision was made from prison. Report all the facts not just some.

  4. Hysteria? Really Ben? Tell the young lady reported on in the link below that worrying about the sexualizing of our children is mere hysteria. Such thinking is common in the Royal Order of Jesters and other running sex vacays in Thailand or Brazil ... like Indy's Jared Fogle. Those tempted to call such concerns mere histronics need to think on this: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/a-12-year-old-girl-live-streamed-her-suicide-it-took-two-weeks-for-facebook-to-take-the-video-down/ar-AAlT8ka?li=AA4ZnC&ocid=spartanntp

  5. This is happening so much. Even in 2016.2017. I hope the father sue for civil rights violation. I hope he sue as more are doing and even without a lawyer as pro-se, he got a good one here. God bless him.

ADVERTISEMENT