ILNews

Technology Untangled: Samsung 7-inch tablet fills a portable niche

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

technology-bourI was intrigued by one of the latest tablet offerings from Samsung, so I bought one to try it out. Today we will review the Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0. The first two things that caught my attention were the low $250 price and the small 7-inch size.

The gold standard in tablets is, of course, the iPad, but its 10-inch size has never appealed to me. I prefer the 7- to 8-inch size because of the ease of holding it in one hand and the ability to slip it into some pockets. The 7-inch Galaxy is likelier to be with me when I need it due to its portability.

The market for smaller tablets exploded last year with the introduction of the similarly sized Kindle Fire. The Kindle’s low $200 price was a huge factor in its success, and I think Samsung took notice. Samsung has offered Galaxy tablets in the 7-inch size for several years, but at prices closer to the $350 to $400 mark. In a move counter to the normal logic of each new model being “bigger, better and faster,” Samsung released the Galaxy Tab 2 with a slightly dialed-back set of specifications in order to meet a price point that could compete with the Kindle. It doesn’t have the fastest processor, the most memory or the biggest cameras, but it does present a very capable and functional package at a competitive price.

While the size and the 1024 x 600 screen resolutions are the same for the Galaxy and the Kindle, several features make the Samsung product a better value. The Galaxy Tab includes a front- and rear-facing camera, as well as a microSD memory card slot for expansion. The Galaxy also includes backlighting, convenient for reading e-books at night.

But there is one feature that is decidedly top-of-the-line on the Galaxy Tab 2 7.0. It includes the newest and slickest Android operating system – the highly anticipated Android version 4.0, also known as Ice Cream Sandwich. This version was designed to function very smoothly on tablets and smartphones. The Galaxy Tab 2 is a full-fledged Android device, unlike the Kindle, which has a more restrictive Android functionality and an inability to access the full universe of Android apps in the Android Market.

The Android Market was recently renamed the Google Play Store and I think this name change gives a clue as to the target market for Android devices. I will be interested to see if there is much development of Android tablets into more serious work tools or if their niche will remain as more of an entertainment device.

For simplicity, I wanted a tablet that operated in a similar manner to my Motorola Android smartphone, but there were enough differences to make the learning curve steeper than expected. Part of this was due to the newer 4.0 operating system and partly to the interface features that Samsung layers on top of that. It probably would have been just as easy to learn the iPad operating system instead.

The Galaxy has taken over some of the tasks that I had been using my smartphone to carry out. Web browsing works well on this device and it is definitely easier to view the tablet screen instead of the phone’s tiny screen. But since it is a WiFi-only device, it doesn’t connect from everywhere like the phone. Tablet browsing is also more convenient and accessible than sitting down in front of the computer, but there is one drawback. There is no easy way to print a Web page. Thus, it seems that for serious Internet research for work, the laptop is still best. The Galaxy Tab does however have a feature that allows you to snap, save and share a screen capture so you can eventually print it.

For email use, the larger screen is also better than the smartphone, but the lack of a real, tactile keyboard is a drawback. The one nice feature about the tablet’s virtual keyboard is an included “.com” key that saves typing time.

As an e-book reader, I really like the Galaxy. The previously mentioned backlight is an important feature for me. For magazines however, I have to admit that a 10-inch iPad-size screen would be better. But while a larger screen would be easier on my eyes, the size tradeoff and the reduced portability are not worth it to me.

In my limited testing thus far, the closest I’ve come to a legitimate work application was in using the Galaxy Tablet for facilitating a face-to-face meeting via Skype. The connection was surprisingly stable, even while moving around, and the picture quality even with the minimal camera was quite acceptable.

The strong points of the Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 are as an entertainment and app downloading device. It has a solid set of features and a great price. While it has filled a niche by taking over some of the tasks previously covered by the smartphone and the laptop, it is the least important work-related device of the three. iPad lovers take note that there are rumors that Apple is developing a low-cost 7-inch iPad to also compete in this market segment.•

__________

Stephen Bour (bourtech@iquest.net) is an engineer and legal technology consultant in Indianapolis. His company, the Alliance for Litigation Support Inc., includes Bour Technical Services and Alliance Court Reporting. Areas of service include legal videography, tape analysis, document scanning to CD and courtroom presentation support. The opinions expressed in this column are those of the author.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
2015 Distinguished Barrister &
Up and Coming Lawyer Reception

Tuesday, May 5, 2015 • 4:30 - 7:00 pm
Learn More


ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The $320,000 is the amount the school spent in litigating two lawsuits: One to release the report involving John Trimble (as noted in the story above) and one defending the discrimination lawsuit. The story above does not mention the amount spent to defend the discrimination suit, that's why the numbers don't match. Thanks for reading.

  2. $160k? Yesterday the figure was $320k. Which is it Indiana Lawyer. And even more interesting, which well connected law firm got the (I am guessing) $320k, six time was the fired chancellor received. LOL. (From yesterday's story, which I guess we were expected to forget overnight ... "According to records obtained by the Journal & Courier, Purdue spent $161,812, beginning in July 2012, in a state open records lawsuit and $168,312, beginning in April 2013, for defense in a federal lawsuit. Much of those fees were spent battling court orders to release an independent investigation by attorney John Trimble that found Purdue could have handled the forced retirement better")

  3. The numbers are harsh; 66 - 24 in the House, 40 - 10 in the Senate. And it is an idea pushed by the Democrats. Dead end? Ummm not necessarily. Just need to go big rather than go home. Nuclear option. Give it to the federal courts, the federal courts will ram this down our throats. Like that other invented right of the modern age, feticide. Rights too precious to be held up by 2000 years of civilization hang in the balance. Onward!

  4. I'm currently seeing someone who has a charge of child pornography possession, he didn't know he had it because it was attached to a music video file he downloaded when he was 19/20 yrs old and fought it for years until he couldn't handle it and plead guilty of possession. He's been convicted in Illinois and now lives in Indiana. Wouldn't it be better to give them a chance to prove to the community and their families that they pose no threat? He's so young and now because he was being a kid and downloaded music at a younger age, he has to pay for it the rest of his life? It's unfair, he can't live a normal life, and has to live in fear of what people can say and do to him because of something that happened 10 years ago? No one deserves that, and no one deserves to be labeled for one mistake, he got labeled even though there was no intent to obtain and use the said content. It makes me so sad to see someone I love go through this and it makes me holds me back a lot because I don't know how people around me will accept him...second chances should be given to those under the age of 21 at least so they can be given a chance to live a normal life as a productive member of society.

  5. It's just an ill considered remark. The Sup Ct is inherently political, as it is a core part of government, and Marbury V Madison guaranteed that it would become ever more so Supremely thus. So her remark is meaningless and she just should have not made it.... what she could have said is that Congress is a bunch of lazys and cowards who wont do their jobs so the hard work of making laws clear, oftentimes stops with the Sups sorting things out that could have been resolved by more competent legislation. That would have been a more worthwhile remark and maybe would have had some relevance to what voters do, since voters cant affect who gets appointed to the supremely un-democratic art III courts.

ADVERTISEMENT