ILNews

Technology Untangled: Using smartphones to enhance shopping

Stephen Bour
December 7, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

technology-bourWith the holiday season in full swing, today we will look at some smartphone applications that you may find helpful in your quest for the perfect gifts at the perfect price.

During Black Friday shopping, I became curious when I noticed some people using their phones to scan barcodes on product boxes. They were not scanning for QR codes, a technology I wrote about recently, but they were scanning the actual UPC codes that are typically scanned during checkout. I learned that the app they were using is RedLaser, a shopping assistant tool for your phone.

RedLaser helps you find the best price for any item on your shopping list. It is actually a service owned and run by the online shopping giant eBay. I like to comparison shop, especially when looking for technology items. But when it comes time to buy, I always wonder if the next store down the street has a better deal. RedLaser makes it easy to compare prices and save the runaround. Simply scan the UPC barcode with your smartphone’s camera, and you can instantly learn the price of the identical item at other stores near you. It also provides a list of online dealers that offer the same item, usually at an even lower price, if you can stand to wait and order online. This app uses your phone’s GPS technology to know where you are and tell you exactly how far it is to the next retailer selling the same item. You can be sure that eBay is tracking what items are the most popular scans in order to compile data on buying trends for hot items. A keyword search is also available, letting you search for the best deals even when you are not able to scan an item’s barcode.

Another similar application called ShopSavvy also scans barcodes and points you toward specific deals at stores near you, as well as including product reviews. Additionally, ShopSavvy broadcasts whatever you happen to be scanning to other users of the app. The home screen of this app is constantly updating a scrolling screen of products with the header “scans near you” displaying prices and the distance from you that another shopper is presently scanning. A little creepy, yes, as this program turns on your GPS transmitter by default when it launches. Some people do like the idea of “social shopping” and revealing to their friends every detail about what they buy and where. For them, I recommend looking at the application Foursquare.

Another useful app helps me organize all those frequent shopper loyalty cards that used to fill up my wallet. CardStar lets me take a scan of each barcode from all those cards and save them to my phone. I then simply present the barcode image from my phone to the checkout attendant at each store instead of fumbling for the correct card. The image is not a photo of the barcode from my dirty old cards, but actually a fresh reproduction of the UPC-style barcode that will never become defaced from knocking around in my pocket. Some of the stored shopper cards also provide links to current special deals at that retailer. The checkout scanning of barcodes from my phone display has not always worked, so test out the functionality at your favorite stores before tossing out the actual cards.

Those shopper loyalty cards were an early form of data collection for shopping habits that still feels invasive to many. Now a new potentially nefarious form of shopper tracking via cell phone is making the news this shopping season. Several malls announced that they were to begin tracking movements of all their shoppers by monitoring the signals from their cell phones. The tracking system is FootPath technology and uses antennas in the mall to read the unique ID number that every cell phone emits whenever it is on. The malls felt they were covered legally by providing small signs at the entrances advising that shoppers could turn off their phones if they didn’t consent to the tracking. They stressed that no personal data was being gathered, such as names, phone numbers or actual purchases. The intent was to glean information about what displays shoppers lingered at, what groupings of stores certain shoppers tended to visit and other such holiday shopping patterns. However, the story of these plans struck a nerve about invasion of privacy with me and apparently with many others. It turns out that several days after the announcement, a United States senator protested and caused the malls to abandon their tracking plans. The new protocol will be for shoppers to choose to opt in to the tracking as opposed to needing to opt out if they don’t like the idea of being monitored.

Tracking technology like this will continue to be an important issue, since nearly everyone carries a tracking device with them at all times now. This data is just too valuable to be ignored by marketing and sales types and governments. Whether it is with localized FootPath technology or worldwide GPS, someone may be watching. Be aware that many smartphone apps besides shopping applications have the technical ability, though not necessarily the legal right, to track and record the movement of your phone (and you). I wonder if Santa carries a smartphone that we can track on Christmas Eve.•

Stephen Bour (bourtech@iquest.net) is an engineer and legal technology consultant in Indianapolis. His company, the Alliance for Litigation Support Inc., includes Bour Technical Services and Alliance Court Reporting. Areas of service include legal videography, tape analysis, document scanning to CD and courtroom presentation support. The opinions expressed in this column are the author’s.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. So that none are misinformed by my posting wihtout a non de plume here, please allow me to state that I am NOT an Indiana licensed attorney, although I am an Indiana resident approved to practice law and represent clients in Indiana's fed court of Nth Dist and before the 7th circuit. I remain licensed in KS, since 1996, no discipline. This must be clarified since the IN court records will reveal that I did sit for and pass the Indiana bar last February. Yet be not confused by the fact that I was so allowed to be tested .... I am not, to be clear in the service of my duty to be absolutely candid about this, I AM NOT a member of the Indiana bar, and might never be so licensed given my unrepented from errors of thought documented in this opinion, at fn2, which likely supports Mr Smith's initial post in this thread: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html

  2. When I served the State of Kansas as Deputy AG over Consumer Protection & Antitrust for four years, supervising 20 special agents and assistant attorneys general (back before the IBLE denied me the right to practice law in Indiana for not having the right stuff and pretty much crushed my legal career) we had a saying around the office: Resist the lure of the ring!!! It was a take off on Tolkiem, the idea that absolute power (I signed investigative subpoenas as a judge would in many other contexts, no need to show probable cause)could corrupt absolutely. We feared that we would overreach constitutional limits if not reminded, over and over, to be mindful to not do so. Our approach in so challenging one another was Madisonian, as the following quotes from the Father of our Constitution reveal: The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse. We are right to take alarm at the first experiment upon our liberties. I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. Liberty may be endangered by the abuse of liberty, but also by the abuse of power. All men having power ought to be mistrusted. -- James Madison, Federalist Papers and other sources: http://www.constitution.org/jm/jm_quotes.htm RESIST THE LURE OF THE RING ALL YE WITH POLITICAL OR JUDICIAL POWER!

  3. My dear Mr Smith, I respect your opinions and much enjoy your posts here. We do differ on our view of the benefits and viability of the American Experiment in Ordered Liberty. While I do agree that it could be better, and that your points in criticism are well taken, Utopia does indeed mean nowhere. I think Madison, Jefferson, Adams and company got it about as good as it gets in a fallen post-Enlightenment social order. That said, a constitution only protects the citizens if it is followed. We currently have a bevy of public officials and judicial agents who believe that their subjectivism, their personal ideology, their elitist fears and concerns and cause celebs trump the constitutions of our forefathers. This is most troubling. More to follow in the next post on that subject.

  4. Yep I am not Bryan Brown. Bryan you appear to be a bigger believer in the Constitution than I am. Were I still a big believer then I might be using my real name like you. Personally, I am no longer a fan of secularism. I favor the confessional state. In religious mattes, it seems to me that social diversity is chaos and conflict, while uniformity is order and peace.... secularism has been imposed by America on other nations now by force and that has not exactly worked out very well.... I think the American historical experiment with disestablishmentarianism is withering on the vine before our eyes..... Since I do not know if that is OK for an officially licensed lawyer to say, I keep the nom de plume.

  5. I am compelled to announce that I am not posting under any Smith monikers here. That said, the post below does have a certain ring to it that sounds familiar to me: http://www.catholicnewworld.com/cnwonline/2014/0907/cardinal.aspx

ADVERTISEMENT