ILNews

Terms of Art: James Strain

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

“When you photograph a face . . . you photograph the soul behind it.”

-Jean-Luc Godard


ArtLong before photography became as ubiquitous as it is now, the uninitiated feared that the camera captured part of the subject’s soul. Maybe not so far from the truth, when one considers the works of Bloomington native and local attorney, James Strain. Whether his photographs depict a remote church, a craggy landscape, or a beloved grandchild, Strain features the character or soul of his subject in a way that makes the viewer feel a sense of connection.

Like countless artists before him, Strain’s photographs often reflect his state of mind at a given time. For instance, he recalls that on an unusually frustrating day at the office, he grabbed his camera and fled the office. Driving through rural Indiana, he happened across a small church and stopped to photograph it. The result is a striking image of a simple and serene white church advancing into the foreground with a menacing sky above. Strain explains that the sky had, in fact, been a brilliant blue that day; however, by using a red filter with his camera, he had enhanced the contrast between clouds in the sky and the stark-white walls of the church, and in so doing, injected the frustration that he was feeling into the image. Ansel Adams once said, “There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.” Naturally, Strain’s own soul is revealed to an extent in his images, most often reflecting his love of mystery, piquing the viewer’s curiosity, and spurring him or her to ask questions.

Interestingly, Strain is as much a lover of the printing process as he is enamored of the final work of art. This ability is due, in part, to the early influence of Strain’s father, who was both a physicist and an architect. This unity of left-and right-brain thinking informs Strain’s unique approach to photography. As such, he is deeply knowledgeable about the science of photography. He prefers to make platinum prints, which are completely matte, virtually indestructible, and which best serve his preferred black-and-white aesthetic. (Platinum prints are characterized by intriguing gradations of black and white tones.) He explains that a photographer’s use of the black-and-white medium is “often a statement in-and-of-itself,” whereby the photographer attempts to evoke a sentiment distinct from the content of the image.
 

terms of art A rural church James Strain photographed while out on a drive. (Photo courtesy James Strain)

In his works, Strain has charted his children’s growth, made portraits of his grandchildren, and chronicled decades of marriage to his beloved wife. He fondly recalls traveling Europe with his children’s choir and finding endless sources of inspiration in majestic cathedrals across the continent. Naturally, photography is an integral part of Strain’s tourist experience; however, he acknowledges that his commitment to perfection has often led his weary family to ask, “Haven’t you gotten the shot yet?” But this is the way of artists, eternally ambitious and perpetually striving to reconcile the various forces at play.

Strain completed his undergraduate studies at Indiana University in Bloomington. He reflects fondly upon a law school professor, Val Nolan Jr., who became his friend and mentor while Strain was an undergraduate work-study student. Nolan, who held full professorships in both the law school and biology department of I.U.’s School of Arts and Sciences, made quite an impression, committed to serving two disciplines – zoology and the law. Strain recalls that his mentor taught him a valuable and enduring lesson when he managed to publish a zoology text during his tenure at the law school. Strain has since shared his mentor’s example with his three children – two of whom are now professional artists. Balance, however elusive, may indeed be struck between seemingly incongruous interests: “You can be a professional and honor your art,” he explains.

This “eureka” moment cemented Strain’s decision to enroll in law school.

And so it is now, all these years later, that Strain – formerly a law clerk to then-Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, William Rehnquist, and now a partner at Taft Stettinius & Hollister – is seldom without a camera. He has chronicled everything from remote locales and famous architectural wonders to the evolution of his family over several decades. Fittingly, several walls and conference rooms at his firm are adorned with his striking still-life photographs and landscapes in an apt metaphor, reflecting the undeniably successful marriage of his professional and artistic pursuits. He credits our profession with enabling him to pursue his admittedly expensive hobby. Far from a mere hobbyist, however, Strain has been represented and promoted by an art brokerage house, presented exhibitions, won competitions, and has sold numerous memorable photographs.

It is a well-settled truth in our profession that there is more to any scenario than meets the eye. Strain maintains that being a photographer has made him a better attorney, and vice versa. His artistic process requires a critical eye; the ability to deftly distill a complex subject into an accessible message; and creative problem-solving when conditions – both predictable and unforeseen – affect his work.

James Strain’s works may be viewed at http://www.jimstrain-photography.com/.•
__________

Wandini Riggins is an associate in the Indianapolis firm of Lewis Wagner. She concentrates her practice in the areas of insurance bad faith disputes and insurance coverage. She can be reached at wriggins@lewiswagner.com. The opinions expressed are those of the author.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. "So we broke with England for the right to "off" our preborn progeny at will, and allow the processing plant doing the dirty deeds (dirt cheap) to profit on the marketing of those "products of conception." I was completely maleducated on our nation's founding, it would seem. (But I know the ACLU is hard at work to remedy that, too.)" Well, you know, we're just following in the footsteps of our founders who raped women, raped slaves, raped children, maimed immigrants, sold children, stole property, broke promises, broke apart families, killed natives... You know, good God fearing down home Christian folk! :/

  2. Who gives a rats behind about all the fluffy ranking nonsense. What students having to pay off debt need to know is that all schools aren't created equal and students from many schools don't have a snowball's chance of getting a decent paying job straight out of law school. Their lowly ranked lawschool won't tell them that though. When schools start honestly (accurately) reporting *those numbers, things will get interesting real quick, and the looks on student's faces will be priceless!

  3. Whilst it may be true that Judges and Justices enjoy such freedom of time and effort, it certainly does not hold true for the average working person. To say that one must 1) take a day or a half day off work every 3 months, 2) gather a list of information including recent photographs, and 3) set up a time that is convenient for the local sheriff or other such office to complete the registry is more than a bit near-sighted. This may be procedural, and hence, in the near-sighted minds of the court, not 'punishment,' but it is in fact 'punishment.' The local sheriffs probably feel a little punished too by the overwork. Registries serve to punish the offender whilst simultaneously providing the public at large with a false sense of security. The false sense of security is dangerous to the public who may not exercise due diligence by thinking there are no offenders in their locale. In fact, the registry only informs them of those who have been convicted.

  4. Unfortunately, the court doesn't understand the difference between ebidta and adjusted ebidta as they clearly got the ruling wrong based on their misunderstanding

  5. A common refrain in the comments on this website comes from people who cannot locate attorneys willing put justice over retainers. At the same time the judiciary threatens to make pro bono work mandatory, seemingly noting the same concern. But what happens to attorneys who have the chumptzah to threatened the legal status quo in Indiana? Ask Gary Welch, ask Paul Ogden, ask me. Speak truth to power, suffer horrendously accordingly. No wonder Hoosier attorneys who want to keep in good graces merely chase the dollars ... the powers that be have no concerns as to those who are ever for sale to the highest bidder ... for those even willing to compromise for $$$ never allow either justice or constitutionality to cause them to stand up to injustice or unconstitutionality. And the bad apples in the Hoosier barrel, like this one, just keep rotting.

ADVERTISEMENT