7th Circuit affirms conviction of man who threatened to blow up courthouse on social media

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A man who wrote a Facebook post threatening to blow up an Indiana courthouse and kill several judicial and law enforcement officials cannot have his sentence overturned on the basis of the jury instruction, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals said Thursday, because the instruction adequately described the man’s actions.

In United States of America v. Samuel L. Bradbury, 16-1532, Jerad and Amanda Miller shot and killed two police officers and one civilian in Las Vegas in June 2014. After the two shooters died in an ensuing shoot-out with police, Samuel Bradbury, a resident of the Millers’ hometown of Lafayette, posted a message on Facebook saying he was the leader of the cop-killing group known as 765 Anarchists, which he claimed the Millers were part of.

Further, Bradbury wrote that the 765 Anarchists’ greater plan was to kill police officers in the Lafayette area, specifically West Lafayette Police Department Office Troy Green and Tippecanoe County Sheriff Tracy Brown, and to “incinerate and destroy no less than six police cars, as well as the Tippecanoe County Courthouse,” including the office of then-Judge Loretta Rush, whom he mentioned by name. However, Bradbury then wrote in the comments of the post that his words were meant to be read as satire.

A screenshot of the later-deleted post was sent to police, and a subsequent warranted search of his bedroom in his parents’ home revealed thermite, ingredients to make more thermite, and magnesium, which can be used to ignite thermite and ultimately cause a great deal of damage.

Bradbury was indicted on federal charges of threatening to use explosive materials to kill law enforcement officers and state court judges and destroy a courthouse and police vehicles. However, a superseding indictment changed the charges to “willfully mak(ing) any threat” and “maliciously convey(ing) false information.” A jury acquitted Bradbury on the first charge but convicted him on the second, resulting in his sentence of 41 months in prison followed by two years of supervised release.

During jury instructions, Judge Philp P. Simon of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana instructed the jury that “maliciously” meant “to act intentionally or with deliberate disregard of the likelihood that damage or injury will result.” On appeal to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, Bradbury argued Simon’s definition of malicious allowed the jury to convict him for merely posting the message, even if he didn’t intend the post to cause harm.

However, Judge Richard Posner, writing for the 7th Circuit panel, said Thursday that making a threat is both intentional and malicious even if the person making the threat does not actually intend to carry the threat out.

“And that is how the government argued the case to the jury – that Bradbury should be convicted because he had conducted an elaborate, detailed and malicious hoax, intending the disruptive effects that resulted from his threat, even though it wasn’t carried out, to blow up a courthouse and kill several named judges and law enforcement officers,” Posner wrote in the unanimous opinion.


  • Error in the Story
    Sam Bradbury was never a resident of Lafayette he lived in rural Tippecanoe County, Thats an error.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Employers should not have racially discriminating mind set. It has huge impact on the society what the big players do or don't do in the industry. Background check is conducted just to verify whether information provided by the prospective employee is correct or not. It doesn't have any direct combination with the rejection of the employees. If there is rejection, there should be something effective and full-proof things on the table that may keep the company or the people associated with it in jeopardy.

  2. Unlike the federal judge who refused to protect me, the Virginia State Bar gave me a hearing. After the hearing, the Virginia State Bar refused to discipline me. VSB said that attacking me with the court ADA coordinator had, " all the grace and charm of a drive-by shooting." One does wonder why the VSB was able to have a hearing and come to that conclusion, but the federal judge in Indiana slammed the door of the courthouse in my face.

  3. I agree. My husband has almost the exact same situation. Age states and all.

  4. Thanks Jim. We surprised ourselves with the first album, so we did a second one. We are releasing it 6/30/17 at the HiFi. The reviews so far are amazing! Skope Mag: It’s Just Craig offers a warm intimacy with the tender folk of “Dark Corners”. Rather lovely in execution, It’s Just Craig opts for a full, rich sound. Quite ornate instrumentally, the songs unfurl with such grace and style. Everything about the album feels real and fully lived. By far the highlight of the album are the soft smooth reassuring vocals whose highly articulate lyrics have a dreamy quality to them. Stories emerge out of these small snapshots of reflective moments.... A wide variety of styles are utilized, with folk anchoring it but allowing for chamber pop, soundtrack work, and found electronics filtering their way into the mix. Without a word, It’s Just Craig sets the tone of the album with the warble of “Intro”. From there things get truly started with the hush of “Go”. Building up into a great structure, “Go” has a kindness to it. Organs glisten in the distance on the fragile textures of “Alone” whose light melody adds to the song’s gorgeousness. A wonderful bloom of color defines the spaciousness of “Captain”. Infectious grooves take hold on the otherworldly origins of “Goodnight” with precise drum work giving the song a jazzy feeling. Hazy to its very core is the tragedy of “Leaving Now”. By far the highlight of the album comes with the closing impassioned “Thirty-Nine” where many layers of sound work together possessing a poetic quality.

  5. Andrew, if what you report is true, then it certainly is newsworthy. If what you report is false, then it certainly is newsworthy. Any journalists reading along??? And that same Coordinator blew me up real good as well, even destroying evidence to get the ordered wetwork done. There is a story here, if any have the moxie to go for it. Search ADA here for just some of my experiences with the court's junk yard dog. Yep, drive by shootings. The lawyers of the Old Dominion got that right. Career executions lacking any real semblance of due process. It is the ISC way ... under the bad shepard's leadership ... and a compliant, silent, boot-licking fifth estate.