ILNews

Tippecanoe County judge recognized for access to justice work

Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Tippecanoe Superior Judge Gregory J. Donat is the 2010 recipient of the American Judicature Society’s Kathleen M. Sampson Access to Justice Award. Judge Donat has worked to improve access to justice for everyone.

Monica Fennell, executive director of the Indiana Pro Bono Commission, nominated the judge because of his work to make sure that pro bono and pro se efforts are integrated and that everyone works together to provide better legal help for the poor. She said he also ensures that victims’ rights and pro se litigant issues aren’t overlooked when he is involved.

Judge Donat has worked not only in Indiana to improve access to justice but also has led and contributed to national projects through specialized courts such as domestic violence and drug courts.

The Kathleen M. Sampson Access to Justice Award is named after the longtime AJS Senior Program Associate and pioneer in the field of improving court services for pro se litigants. The award is given to people or organizations that make extraordinary contributions to ensure access to justice for everyone.

Judge Donat is on Superior Court 4, which handles landlord/tenant cases, small claims, misdemeanor and Class D felony drug cases, and the Therapeutic Drug Court. He will receive the award at the statewide Indiana judicial conference later this month.  
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT