ILNews

Town court judge publicly admonished

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications issued a public admonition of the Walkerton Town Court judge today for employing his wife as court clerk for more than 10 years and for participating in an ex parte conversation with a defendant about her traffic infractions.

Judge Roger L. Huizenga was admonished for violating Canon 3C(4) and Rule 2.12 - which replaced Canon 3C(4) effective Jan. 1, 2009 - when he hired his wife as court clerk for the town court in St. Joseph County. His wife was court clerk from November 1995 until March 13, 2009, when she resigned after the initiation of the commission's investigation.

In 1998, the ICJQ issued an advisory opinion setting out guidelines and restrictions for judges on the hiring of friends or relatives and stated judges were advised to contact the commission to discuss potential employment. The opinion also stated the employment or appointment of a spouse will likely never be appropriate. Judge Huizenga didn't contact the commission to discuss employing his wife as court clerk.

The judge admitted violating Cannons 1, 2 and 3B(8) as a result of his participating in an ex parte conversation with a woman on the state of her traffic violations and for his assumption of the role of prosecutor when he negotiated a resolution to the defendant's case. He told her she would have to pay her speeding ticket but her ticket for the expired license plate would be dismissed if she renewed her plate within 30 days. No deputy prosecutor was present for the conversation between Judge Huizenga and the defendant.

The admonition concludes the commission's investigation and the judge won't be formally charged with ethical misconduct.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Thanks for this article. We live in Evansville, IN and are aware of how bad the child abuse is here. Can you please send us the statistics for here in Vanderburgh, County. Our web site is: www.ritualabusefree.org Thanks again

  2. This ruling has no application to Indiana. The tail end of the article is misleading where it states criminal penalties await those who refuse a test. This is false. An administrative license suspension is what awaits you. No more, no less.

  3. Yellow journalism much??? "The outcome underscores that the direction of U.S. immigration policy will be determined in large part by this fall's presidential election, a campaign in which immigration already has played an outsized role." OUTSIZED? by whose standards? Also this: "In either case, legal challenges to executive action under her administration would come to a court that would have a majority of Democratic-appointed justices and, in all likelihood, give efforts to help immigrants a friendlier reception." Ah, also, did you forget an adjective at the *** marks ahead by any chance? Thinking of one that rhymes with bald eagle? " In either case, legal challenges to executive action under her administration would come to a court that would have a majority of Democratic-appointed justices and, in all likelihood, give efforts to help *** immigrants a friendlier reception."

  4. Definition of furnish. : to provide (a room or building) with furniture. : to supply or give (something) to someone or something. : to supply or give to (someone) something that is needed or wanted. Judge Kincaid: if furnish means provide, and the constitution says the provider in a uni is the township, how on earth are they seperated??

  5. I never filed a law suite. I had no money for a lawyer. In 2010 I presented for MRI/with contrast. The technician stuck my left arm three times with needle to inject dye. I was w/out O2 for two minutes, not breathing, no ambulance was called. I suffered an Embolism ,Myocardia infarction. Permanent memory loss, heart damage. After the event, I could not remember what I did five seconds earlier. I had no-one to help me. I lost my dental hygiene career, been homeless, etc.

ADVERTISEMENT