Some former Chesterfield town employees accused by the Indiana Attorney General of defrauding their town government now face
federal charges.
Christopher Parrish, of Chesterfield; James Kimm, Joseph Brown, and Willard A. Felts, all of Anderson, were indicted by a
grand jury in U.S. District Court Tuesday for theft of federal program funds following an investigation by the FBI and Indiana
State Police. Felts wasn't named in the state suit.
An Oct. 26, 2009, audit by the State Board of Accounts found Parrish, Kimm, Brown, and brothers Christopher and James Walters
defrauded taxpayers out of nearly $260,000 by getting paid for false mileage reimbursement claims and other phony claims,
as well as hours they never worked in 2007 and 2008. The state filed charges against the men and two insurers in late November
seeking repayment of the public funds and payment of employee-theft insurance Chesterfield took out on the employees in 2007
and 2008.
At the time of the scheme, Parrish was the town's clerk-treasurer; Kimm was a town marshal; Brown was a part-time police
officer, and Felts allowed Parrish to use his name to create false invoices. Christopher and James Walters were town maintenance
employees who were paid for repair work they never did.
The men face a maximum of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine on each count; Parrish is charged with three; Kimm faces
two charges; and Brown and Felts each face one count.














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.