ILNews

Town takes unusual step to gain control of utility

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The town of Mooresville’s legal fight to reclaim control of its water utility is so rare in Indiana that observers say just one other community has taken such drastic action.

But lawyers representing the Morgan County community in its lawsuit against Indiana American Water think history is on their side. And that history could prove powerful.

The Indiana Supreme Court and the Legislature in the past five years weighed in on a similar issue following a years-long battle involving the city of Fort Wayne and its water utility operator.

“I am sure, given the length of time that litigation took, it could be a very expensive procedure,” said Bette Dodd, a utility lawyer at Lewis & Kappes who is not involved in the Mooresville suit. “But some of the gray areas have been resolved.”

Indiana American Water is a unit of Voorhees, N.J.-based American Water Works Co. Inc. with nearly 300,000 customers in 51 communities throughout the state. It has served Mooresville since 2000, when it bought Hoosier Water Co. Inc.

Officials of Mooresville sued Indiana American Water in Morgan Superior Court in late December.

Prompted by a fear of rising water rates, the officials want to acquire the town’s water utility through eminent domain. The legal action follows the town’s attempt to purchase the utility for $6.5 million, an offer too low for the liking of Indiana American Water.

Indiana American Water fired the first salvo in the dispute by suing the town in October, charging that officials violated due process by approving an ordinance to pursue their purchase of the utility.

Sorting out the legal morass could take time, judging from the 10 years Fort Wayne has spent to gain control of its water utility. Even so, the legal waters Mooresville will maneuver might not be as murky now that a precedent has been set.

“I think the path is pretty clear,” said Chris Janak, a lawyer at Bose McKinney & Evans LLP who represents the town. “Mooresville is allowed by law to do this.”

Indiana American Water’s attorney, however, is not so sure.

“There are first-impression things that will still have to be dealt with,” said Cristy Wheeler, the company’s corporate counsel. “It’s very unusual in Indiana, and it’s never happened to us.”

For guidance, Mooresville can turn to Fort Wayne’s tiff with Aqua Indiana, a division of Bryn Mawr, Pa.-based Aqua America Inc. that began in 2002. Dissatisfied with service, the city attempted to use eminent domain to force a sale of part of Aqua’s service area.

The Indiana Supreme Court sided with Fort Wayne in 2007 and the city took control of a portion of the service area the following year. The city now is attempting to gain control of the entire area by purchasing the rest of Aqua’s service area.

Between the Supreme Court decision and Fort Wayne’s follow-up battle with Aqua America, in 2009, the General Assembly passed a law supporting the court’s decision backing use of eminent domain to purchase a private utility.

Mooresville’s acquisition of Indiana American Water might seem like a lock, then, but legislation introduced this session by state Sen. Jim Merritt, R-Indianapolis, is much more friendly to water utilities.

Senate Bill 548 would allow communities to buy their water utilities only after the utilities fail to remedy repeated violations. And even then, a city would need public approval through referendum.

The Indiana Chamber of Commerce supports parts of the legislation but thinks a referendum may be unnecessary, said Vince Griffin, vice president of energy and environmental affairs.

“It seems to have some very rigorous things in there,” he said, “but we like it to not be easy for a municipality to divorce you and take over.”

While lawmakers debate the bill, Mooresville and Indiana American Water continue hurling barbs.

Janak, Mooresville’s lawyer, says the utility has raised rates and plans to raise them even more without investing in the town’s water infrastructure.

“As clear as the law is, it is incredibly contentious,” he said. “More than it should be.”

Indiana American Water says the average customer in Mooresville pays about $35 per month, which would rise to $39 with its plans to improve infrastructure.

“We’ve been scratching our heads all along about what’s been going on here,” Indiana American Water President Alan DeBoy said. “They think they can operate it at lower rates and more efficiently, but it’s not logical because they have no scale.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Just an aside, but regardless of the outcome, I 'm proud of Judge William Hughes. He was the original magistrate on the Home place issue. He ruled for Home Place, and was primaried by Brainard for it. Their tool Poindexter failed to unseat Hughes, who won support for his honesty and courage throughout the county, and he was reelected Judge of Hamilton County's Superior Court. You can still stand for something and survive. Thanks, Judge Hughes!

  2. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  3. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  4. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  5. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

ADVERTISEMENT