ILNews

Town takes unusual step to gain control of utility

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The town of Mooresville’s legal fight to reclaim control of its water utility is so rare in Indiana that observers say just one other community has taken such drastic action.

But lawyers representing the Morgan County community in its lawsuit against Indiana American Water think history is on their side. And that history could prove powerful.

The Indiana Supreme Court and the Legislature in the past five years weighed in on a similar issue following a years-long battle involving the city of Fort Wayne and its water utility operator.

“I am sure, given the length of time that litigation took, it could be a very expensive procedure,” said Bette Dodd, a utility lawyer at Lewis & Kappes who is not involved in the Mooresville suit. “But some of the gray areas have been resolved.”

Indiana American Water is a unit of Voorhees, N.J.-based American Water Works Co. Inc. with nearly 300,000 customers in 51 communities throughout the state. It has served Mooresville since 2000, when it bought Hoosier Water Co. Inc.

Officials of Mooresville sued Indiana American Water in Morgan Superior Court in late December.

Prompted by a fear of rising water rates, the officials want to acquire the town’s water utility through eminent domain. The legal action follows the town’s attempt to purchase the utility for $6.5 million, an offer too low for the liking of Indiana American Water.

Indiana American Water fired the first salvo in the dispute by suing the town in October, charging that officials violated due process by approving an ordinance to pursue their purchase of the utility.

Sorting out the legal morass could take time, judging from the 10 years Fort Wayne has spent to gain control of its water utility. Even so, the legal waters Mooresville will maneuver might not be as murky now that a precedent has been set.

“I think the path is pretty clear,” said Chris Janak, a lawyer at Bose McKinney & Evans LLP who represents the town. “Mooresville is allowed by law to do this.”

Indiana American Water’s attorney, however, is not so sure.

“There are first-impression things that will still have to be dealt with,” said Cristy Wheeler, the company’s corporate counsel. “It’s very unusual in Indiana, and it’s never happened to us.”

For guidance, Mooresville can turn to Fort Wayne’s tiff with Aqua Indiana, a division of Bryn Mawr, Pa.-based Aqua America Inc. that began in 2002. Dissatisfied with service, the city attempted to use eminent domain to force a sale of part of Aqua’s service area.

The Indiana Supreme Court sided with Fort Wayne in 2007 and the city took control of a portion of the service area the following year. The city now is attempting to gain control of the entire area by purchasing the rest of Aqua’s service area.

Between the Supreme Court decision and Fort Wayne’s follow-up battle with Aqua America, in 2009, the General Assembly passed a law supporting the court’s decision backing use of eminent domain to purchase a private utility.

Mooresville’s acquisition of Indiana American Water might seem like a lock, then, but legislation introduced this session by state Sen. Jim Merritt, R-Indianapolis, is much more friendly to water utilities.

Senate Bill 548 would allow communities to buy their water utilities only after the utilities fail to remedy repeated violations. And even then, a city would need public approval through referendum.

The Indiana Chamber of Commerce supports parts of the legislation but thinks a referendum may be unnecessary, said Vince Griffin, vice president of energy and environmental affairs.

“It seems to have some very rigorous things in there,” he said, “but we like it to not be easy for a municipality to divorce you and take over.”

While lawmakers debate the bill, Mooresville and Indiana American Water continue hurling barbs.

Janak, Mooresville’s lawyer, says the utility has raised rates and plans to raise them even more without investing in the town’s water infrastructure.

“As clear as the law is, it is incredibly contentious,” he said. “More than it should be.”

Indiana American Water says the average customer in Mooresville pays about $35 per month, which would rise to $39 with its plans to improve infrastructure.

“We’ve been scratching our heads all along about what’s been going on here,” Indiana American Water President Alan DeBoy said. “They think they can operate it at lower rates and more efficiently, but it’s not logical because they have no scale.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT