The Indiana Supreme Court granted transfer this week to case in which a defendant believed the trial court abused its discretion
in referring to his Level of Service Inventory-Revised and Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory scores.
In Anthony Malenchik v. State of Indiana, No. 79A02-0902-CR-133, Anthony Malenchik believed the Tippecanoe
Superior Court shouldn't have referenced his LSI-R and SASSI scores during his sentencing hearing for receiving stolen
property as a Class D felony. His sentence - six years, with two suspended to probation - was enhanced because the court found
Malenchik to be a habitual offender.
Although the trial court made reference to Malenchik's scores, based on the court transcript, the Indiana Court of Appeals
deemed the trial court based its sentence on a series of proper considerations. Even though the trial court didn't make
findings of aggravating or mitigating circumstances, it did find Malenchik lacked credibility, he repeatedly failed to take
advantage of court-ordered services, and he continued to do drugs despite court-ordered testing.
The appellate court also affirmed his sentence.














vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.