ILNews

Truck drivers sue Celadon over wages, employment status

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Three former drivers for Celadon Group are suing the Indianapolis-based trucking company, claiming it violated state and federal laws by hiring them as independent contractors and unlawfully withholding portions of their wages.

In their lawsuit, the former drivers say the amounts of the withholdings were so high that they typically earned less than the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour.

The drivers are seeking class-action status in federal court in Indianapolis and estimate the number of truckers who could be affected to be in the thousands. Celadon provides trucking services throughout the United States, Canada and Mexico, and is one of the nation’s largest trucking companies.

William Blakley and Helen Blakley, both of Siler City, North Carolina, and Kimberly Smith of Jacksonville, Florida, all worked for Celadon in 2015 but voluntarily left after stints ranging from just two to four months on the job.

Under state and federal law, the three claim they should have been considered Celadon employees because the company required them to attend a three-day orientation, undergo a physical exam, take drug and road tests, and watch numerous training videos.

They further claim their contracts with publicly traded Celadon prohibited them from driving for another carrier, preventing them from increasing their income. The only way they could increase profitability, the suit says, was to attempt to improve their efficiency.

During their time with Celadon, the three claim the firm made “unlawful deductions” from their paychecks, including for trailer lease payments, fuel, toll charges, and other fees.

The drivers argue in the suit that Celadon violated the Indiana Wage Payment Statute and Fair Labor Standards Act by not hiring them as employees and paying them “less than the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour for all hours worked during a work week.”

Besides class-action status, the three are seeking “pay and benefits they would have received had it not been for [Celadon’s] illegal actions,” in addition to liquidated damages.

The drivers filed the suit in federal court on Feb. 12. Celadon has until April 14 to respond to the complaint.

In an email to IBJ, Celadon said it has "a policy of not commenting substantively on pending litigation. Celadon is aware of the lawsuit and intends to defend vigorously the independent-contractor status of its owner-operators, whose entrepreneurial spirit and hard work is very much appreciated by the company."
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Celadon not paying bonus
    You need to look into Celadon not paying sign on bonuses. We call get the run
  • im in same
    Been there 4 months with 1 paycheck what can i do

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The Department of Education still has over $100 million of ITT Education Services money in the form of $100+ million Letters of Credit. That money was supposed to be used by The DOE to help students. The DOE did nothing to help students. The DOE essentially stole the money from ITT Tech and still has the money. The trustee should be going after the DOE to get the money back for people who are owed that money, including shareholders.

  2. Do you know who the sponsor of the last-minute amendment was?

  3. Law firms of over 50 don't deliver good value, thats what this survey really tells you. Anybody that has seen what they bill for compared to what they deliver knows that already, however.

  4. My husband left me and the kids for 2 years, i did everything humanly possible to get him back i prayed i even fasted nothing worked out. i was so diver-stated, i was left with nothing no money to pay for kids up keep. my life was tearing apart. i head that he was trying to get married to another lady in Italy, i look for urgent help then i found Dr.Mack in the internet by accident, i was skeptical because i don’t really believe he can bring husband back because its too long we have contacted each other, we only comment on each other status on Facebook and when ever he come online he has never talks anything about coming back to me, i really had to give Dr.Mack a chance to help me out, luckily for me he was God sent and has made everything like a dream to me, Dr.Mack told me that everything will be fine, i called him and he assured me that my Husband will return, i was having so many doubt but now i am happy,i can’t believe it my husband broke up with his Italian lady and he is now back to me and he can’t even stay a minute without me, all he said to me was that he want me back, i am really happy and i cried so much because it was unbelievable, i am really happy and my entire family are happy for me but they never know whats the secret behind this…i want you all divorce lady or single mother, unhappy relationship to please contact this man for help and everything will be fine i really guarantee you….if you want to contact him you can reach him through dr.mac@yahoo. com..,

  5. As one of the many consumers affected by this breach, I found my bank data had been lifted and used to buy over $200 of various merchandise in New York. I did a pretty good job of tracing the purchases to stores around a college campus just from the info on my bank statement. Hm. Mr. Hill, I would like my $200 back! It doesn't belong to the state, in my opinion. Give it back to the consumers affected. I had to freeze my credit and take out data protection, order a new debit card and wait until it arrived. I deserve something for my trouble!

ADVERTISEMENT