Truck drivers sue Celadon over wages, employment status

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Three former drivers for Celadon Group are suing the Indianapolis-based trucking company, claiming it violated state and federal laws by hiring them as independent contractors and unlawfully withholding portions of their wages.

In their lawsuit, the former drivers say the amounts of the withholdings were so high that they typically earned less than the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour.

The drivers are seeking class-action status in federal court in Indianapolis and estimate the number of truckers who could be affected to be in the thousands. Celadon provides trucking services throughout the United States, Canada and Mexico, and is one of the nation’s largest trucking companies.

William Blakley and Helen Blakley, both of Siler City, North Carolina, and Kimberly Smith of Jacksonville, Florida, all worked for Celadon in 2015 but voluntarily left after stints ranging from just two to four months on the job.

Under state and federal law, the three claim they should have been considered Celadon employees because the company required them to attend a three-day orientation, undergo a physical exam, take drug and road tests, and watch numerous training videos.

They further claim their contracts with publicly traded Celadon prohibited them from driving for another carrier, preventing them from increasing their income. The only way they could increase profitability, the suit says, was to attempt to improve their efficiency.

During their time with Celadon, the three claim the firm made “unlawful deductions” from their paychecks, including for trailer lease payments, fuel, toll charges, and other fees.

The drivers argue in the suit that Celadon violated the Indiana Wage Payment Statute and Fair Labor Standards Act by not hiring them as employees and paying them “less than the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour for all hours worked during a work week.”

Besides class-action status, the three are seeking “pay and benefits they would have received had it not been for [Celadon’s] illegal actions,” in addition to liquidated damages.

The drivers filed the suit in federal court on Feb. 12. Celadon has until April 14 to respond to the complaint.

In an email to IBJ, Celadon said it has "a policy of not commenting substantively on pending litigation. Celadon is aware of the lawsuit and intends to defend vigorously the independent-contractor status of its owner-operators, whose entrepreneurial spirit and hard work is very much appreciated by the company."


  • Celadon not paying bonus
    You need to look into Celadon not paying sign on bonuses. We call get the run
  • im in same
    Been there 4 months with 1 paycheck what can i do

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It's an appreciable step taken by the government to curb the child abuse that are happening in the schools. Employees in the schools those are selected without background check can not be trusted. A thorough background check on the teachers or any other other new employees must be performed to choose the best and quality people. Those who are already employed in the past should also be checked for best precaution. The future of kids can be saved through this simple process. However, the checking process should be conducted by the help of a trusted background checking agency(

  2. Almost everything connects to internet these days. From your computers and Smartphones to wearable gadgets and smart refrigerators in your home, everything is linked to the Internet. Although this convenience empowers usto access our personal devices from anywhere in the world such as an IP camera, it also deprives control of our online privacy. Cyber criminals, hackers, spies and everyone else has realized that we don’t have complete control on who can access our personal data. We have to take steps to to protect it like keeping Senseless password. Dont leave privacy unprotected. Check out this article for more ways:

  3. You need to look into Celadon not paying sign on bonuses. We call get the run

  4. My parents took advantage of the fact that I was homeless in 2012 and went to court and got Legal Guardianship I my 2 daughters. I am finally back on my feet and want them back, but now they want to fight me on it. I want to raise my children and have them almost all the time on the weekends. Mynparents are both almost 70 years old and they play favorites which bothers me a lot. Do I have a leg to stand on if I go to court to terminate lehal guardianship? My kids want to live with me and I want to raise them, this was supposed to be temporary, and now it is turning into a fight. Ridiculous

  5. Here's my two cents. While in Texas in 2007 I was not registered because I only had to do it for ten years. So imagine my surprise as I find myself forced to register in Texas because indiana can't get their head out of their butt long enough to realize they passed an ex post facto law in 2006. So because Indiana had me listed as a failure to register Texas said I had to do it there. Now if Indiana had done right by me all along I wouldn't need the aclu to defend my rights. But such is life.