Six delegates from the Ukraine’s legal community will be in Indianapolis through Saturday to learn about the American
legal system by observing court hearings and meeting with members of the legal community, as well as participating in cultural
activities.
The Open World Leadership Center is funding the visit, and the Russian American Rule of Law Consortium, a group of legal
communities that seeks to build legal institutions by hosting delegations from Russia, Ukraine and other former Soviet republics
who study various facets of the U.S. legal system, is administering the visit.
The Indiana Attorney General’s Office is hosting the delegates, and delegates will be staying with volunteers in their
homes.
Delegates will be able to observe the legal system first hand, including oral arguments at the Indiana Supreme Court, and
visits to the Indianapolis Legal Aid Society, the Marion Superior Court, the Indianapolis Bar Association and the Indianapolis
Metropolitan Police Department’s Arrestee Processing Center.
In addition to visits to courts and legal organizations, members of the Attorney General’s staff, including Solicitor
General Thomas M. Fisher; Chief Deputy Attorney General Gary Secrest; and Deputy Attorney General Abigail Kuzma, chief counsel
of the Consumer Protection Division; and congressional staff from the offices of both U.S. Senator Richard Lugar and Congressman
Steve Buyer will meet with the delegates. Delegates will also meet with Indiana senators.
The Open World program, founded by Congress in 1999, will also fund cultural experiences for the delegates, including visits
to the Indiana State Museum, Eiteljorg Museum of American Indian and Western Art, an Indiana Ice hockey game, the Indianapolis
500 Motor Speedway, and other cultural attractions in Indianapolis.
A more in-depth look at this visit will be in the Oct. 27, 2010, edition of Indiana Lawyer.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.