ILNews

Ukrainian judges to visit for 5th time

IL Staff
November 11, 2009
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For the fifth consecutive year, Ukrainian judges will visit the Indiana Supreme Court to learn about the U.S. government. The five judges will be in Indianapolis and Noblesville Nov. 14-21, and will attend an oral argument at the high court, view criminal and civil proceedings, visit the re-entry educational facility in Plainfield, and exchange information with the Division of State Court Administration and the Indiana Judicial Center.

They will also meet with Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard, Marion Superior Judge Gerald S. Zore, and Hamilton Superior Magistrate Judge William Greenaway.

The judges, their facilitator, and two interpreters are participants in the Open World Program, a nonpartisan initiative of the U.S. Congress to build mutual understanding between emerging political and civic leaders of participating countries.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT