ILNews

Uninsured motorist coverage claim

May 26, 2010
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Trial Report

Michael Dec Jr. and Pamela M. Dec v. Encompass Insurance

Lake Superior Court No. 45D05-0606-CT124

Injuries:
Soft tissue; cervical strain and aggravation of pre-existing asymptomatic arthritis

Date: Feb. 8-10, 2010

Judge or Jury Trial: Jury trial

Judge: Hon. William Davis

Disposition: $40,000 compensatory

Plaintiff Attorney: Kenneth M. Wilk, Highland

Defendant Attorney: William K. Deer, Merrillville

Insurance:
Encompass Insurance

Case Information: Plaintiff passenger in stopped SUV was rear-ended at 35 mph by another SUV. Plaintiff treated for about a year, including injections, followed by a hiatus of three years, after which plaintiff resumed treatment.

PPI rating of 8 percent.

Jury was informed that plaintiff’s billed medical (expenses) were $46,583.40 but that only $24,704.47 were actually paid.

Jury was also informed that plaintiff recovered policy limits of $50,000 from primary carrier and was making claim against her own carrier for UIM.

Encompass offered $5,000; declined by plaintiffs.•

– Kenneth M. Wilk

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I was looking through some of your blog posts on this internet site and I conceive this web site is rattling informative ! Keep on posting . dfkcfdkdgbekdffe

  2. Don't believe me, listen to Pacino: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6bC9w9cH-M

  3. Law school is social control the goal to produce a social product. As such it began after the Revolution and has nearly ruined us to this day: "“Scarcely any political question arises in the United States which is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. Hence all parties are obliged to borrow, in their daily controversies, the ideas, and even the language, peculiar to judicial proceedings. As most public men [i.e., politicians] are, or have been, legal practitioners, they introduce the customs and technicalities of their profession into the management of public affairs. The jury extends this habitude to all classes. The language of the law thus becomes, in some measure, a vulgar tongue; the spirit of the law, which is produced in the schools and courts of justice, gradually penetrates beyond their walls into the bosom of society, where it descends to the lowest classes, so that at last the whole people contract the habits and the tastes of the judicial magistrate.” ? Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

  4. Attorney? Really? Or is it former attorney? Status with the Ind St Ct? Status with federal court, with SCOTUS? This is a legal newspaper, or should I look elsewhere?

  5. Once again Indiana has not only shown what little respect it has for animals, but how little respect it has for the welfare of the citizens of the state. Dumping manure in a pond will most certainly pollute the environment and ground water. Who thought of this spiffy plan? No doubt the livestock industry. So all the citizens of Indiana have to suffer pollution for the gain of a few livestock producers who are only concerned about their own profits at the expense of everyone else who lives in this State. Shame on the Environmental Rules Board!

ADVERTISEMENT