Women IP attorneys launch central Indiana chapter of ChIPS, one of first in Midwest

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
chips-051717-15col.jpg Attorneys (from left) Deborah Pollack-Milgate, Alicia Gentile and Elizabeth Shuster launched the Indianapolis ChIPS chapter. (IL Photo/Eric Learned)

Elizabeth Shuster has always worked in male-dominated professions.

She was first a civil engineer for about six years before deciding to enroll in Indiana University Maurer School of Law, where she gravitated to intellectual property. The partner at Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP has often been either the only one or one of a few women in the room whether she was designing bridges, studying IP law, sitting for the patent bar or working as a patent prosecutor.

Shuster has no stories of harassment or being belittled by male co-workers and bosses. Yet even though her gender has not prevented her from building an impressive resume, she noted it has divided her from her colleagues and hindered her from truly belonging.

“Most of the male attorneys I have worked with have been great and supportive, but you never feel like you’re necessarily one of the club,” Shuster said. “Nothing is ever said to me to make me feel excluded, but you always feel different.”

Other women such as Shuster serving in technical and legal fields may be one of a handful in their offices, unconnected to females doing the same type of work for other companies and businesses. They are scattered at different law firms and in-house legal departments, usually meeting mostly by happenstance.

A similar randomness put Shuster and her professional colleague Alicia Gentile, patent prosecutor for Rolls Royce Corp., in touch with Deborah Pollack-Milgate, partner at Barnes & Thornburg LLP. Now the three are trying to remove the happenstance and create a forum where women IP attorneys in Indianapolis can meet and help one another.

They’ve launched a local chapter of the national organization ChIPS (Chiefs in Intellectual Property). At a kickoff reception April 27, about 30 women came together to network and participate in a panel discussion examining the careers of women in IP. ChIPS co-founder Emily Ward, CEO of Calla Nava and alumnae of Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, was the featured guest.

ChIPS was founded in 2005 by Ward and six other women who are leading IP departments at technology companies in Silicon Valley. Ward was previously vice president and chief technology counsel at eBay and PayPal. The mission of the nonprofit, which currently has more than 1,500 members, is to connect and advance women working in technical legal fields.

Pollack-Milgate was introduced to ChIPS last fall when, at the invitation of a client, she attended the organization’s conference in Washington, D.C. She was excited at the quality of programming, the depth of the discussions and the caliber of women.

At the event, she also learned about the effort to expand. She returned home to Indiana and began helping to establish a ChIPS chapter in central Indiana, one of the first in the Midwest.

Pollack-Milgate, Shuster and Gentile see the Indiana chapter as benefiting the national group by bringing in women from a different technology sector than what is present on the East and West coasts. Computer-based companies such as Google, Facebook and Oracle are headquartered in California while Indiana is home to pharmaceutical labs, medical device manufacturers, aerospace companies and engine makers.

“We have a breadth that I think they don’t have if you’re just on the two coasts,” Pollack-Milgate said. “They won’t refer to us as a flyover state anymore.”

chips-event-pics-15-15col.jpg ChIPS co-founder and IU McKinney graduate Emily Ward was the featured guest at the first meeting of the Indianapolis ChIPS chapter. About 30 women attended the April event. (Photo courtsey of Sease, Gerig & Associates)

A list of words

Before she heard of ChIPS, Shuster had the idea of starting a group for Indianapolis women in IP. She saw a need for a professional organization where female technology attorneys could network, find mentors and discuss career options. Shuster recruited Gentile, and together the two hosted a pair of events where someone mentioned ChIPS.

Shuster subsequently emailed ChIPS and the national organization directed her to Pollack-Milgate.

A patent litigator, Pollack-Milgate got into the practice area when Barnes & Thornburg asked if she would be interested in interviewing for a position in the intellectual property department. She, just like Shuster and Gentile, has found the work rewarding because she has been able to learn about the different technologies underlying a range of products from bottlecaps and rearview mirrors.

Yet, she has encountered obstacles from opposing male counsel. She said she has been dismissed, patronized, demeaned and cast as being inexperienced. In response, she has kept a list of names hurled at her over the years.

“When you’re aggressive as a woman, because you have to be as a litigator, all of the sudden you get called testy or something,” Pollack-Milgate said.

Then she admitted “testy” is not the worst word on her list. The list continues to grow with the words “belligerent, bombastic and bellicose” being added by a letter she received last year. Pollack-Milgate sees the description as the result of her gender.

“I do not believe a male attorney would have used those same words for another male,” she said.
Pushing progress

However, the purpose of ChIPS is not to commiserate over tough times. Pollack-Milgate explained the local chapter can bring women IP attorneys together so they can find support, gain business contacts, learn of job openings and realize they are not alone.

In addition to connecting with other women, Pollack-Milgate sees a need for the IP attorneys to return to their firms and departments and educate their peers. She believes much of the bias is unintentional and largely the result of having little interaction with women.

“I don’t think most people are somehow trying to prevent women from succeeding in their careers,” she said. “It’s just you have to change the status quo and that doesn’t really happen by itself.”

A sign that progress is being made might be Gentile’s experience as an IP attorney.

She earned degrees in zoology and pharmacology before settling into nanotechnology research. Looking for her next career move, she went to law school and studied intellectual property. Today at Rolls Royce, she works directly with the engineers and other attorneys.

“I don’t see any differences between myself and the three male IP counsels we have,” Gentile said. “Everybody has the same opportunities, the same challenges, the same flexibility.”

The three women are starting to plan other events for the Indiana ChIPS chapter this year that will include programs focused on women just beginning their careers in IP and on community outreach to women entrepreneurs and girls interested in science. They are welcoming female IP attorneys, women attorneys thinking about switching to IP, and law students. They also hope to bring in more members from the judiciary, in-house counsel departments, utilities and universities.

“I think it’s a really good opportunity for women in IP,” Shuster said.•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. One can only wonder whether Mr. Kimmel was paid for his work by Mr. Burgh ... or whether that bill fell to the citizens of Indiana, many of whom cannot afford attorneys for important matters. It really doesn't take a judge(s) to know that "pavement" can be considered a deadly weapon. It only takes a brain and some education or thought. I'm glad to see the conviction was upheld although sorry to see that the asphalt could even be considered "an issue".

  2. In response to bryanjbrown: thank you for your comment. I am familiar with Paul Ogden (and applaud his assistance to Shirley Justice) and have read of Gary Welsh's (strange) death (and have visited his blog on many occasions). I am not familiar with you (yet). I lived in Kosciusko county, where the sheriff was just removed after pleading in what seems a very "sweetheart" deal. Unfortunately, something NEEDS to change since the attorneys won't (en masse) stand up for ethics (rather making a show to please the "rules" and apparently the judges). I read that many attorneys are underemployed. Seems wisdom would be to cull the herd and get rid of the rotting apples in practice and on the bench, for everyone's sake as well as justice. I'd like to file an attorney complaint, but I have little faith in anything (other than the most flagrant and obvious) resulting in action. My own belief is that if this was medicine, there'd be maimed and injured all over and the carnage caused by "the profession" would be difficult to hide. One can dream ... meanwhile, back to figuring out to file a pro se "motion to dismiss" as well as another court required paper that Indiana is so fond of providing NO resources for (unlike many other states, who don't automatically assume that citizens involved in the court process are scumbags) so that maybe I can get the family law attorney - whose work left me with no settlement, no possessions and resulted in the death of two pets (etc ad nauseum) - to stop abusing the proceedings supplemental and small claims rules and using it as a vehicle for harassment and apparently, amusement.

  3. Been on social security sense sept 2011 2massive strokes open heart surgery and serious ovarian cancer and a blood clot in my lung all in 14 months. Got a letter in may saying that i didn't qualify and it was in form like i just applied ,called social security she said it don't make sense and you are still geting a check in june and i did ,now i get a check from my part D asking for payment for july because there will be no money for my membership, call my prescription coverage part D and confirmed no check will be there.went to social security they didn't want to answer whats going on just said i should of never been on it .no one knows where this letter came from was California im in virginia and been here sense my strokes and vcu filed for my disability i was in the hospital when they did it .It's like it was a error . My ,mothers social security was being handled in that office in California my sister was dealing with it and it had my social security number because she died last year and this letter came out of the same office and it came at the same time i got the letter for my mother benefits for death and they had the same date of being typed just one was on the mail Saturday and one on Monday. . I think it's a mistake and it should been fixed instead there just getting rid of me .i never got a formal letter saying when i was being tsken off.

  4. Employers should not have racially discriminating mind set. It has huge impact on the society what the big players do or don't do in the industry. Background check is conducted just to verify whether information provided by the prospective employee is correct or not. It doesn't have any direct combination with the rejection of the employees. If there is rejection, there should be something effective and full-proof things on the table that may keep the company or the people associated with it in jeopardy.

  5. Unlike the federal judge who refused to protect me, the Virginia State Bar gave me a hearing. After the hearing, the Virginia State Bar refused to discipline me. VSB said that attacking me with the court ADA coordinator had, " all the grace and charm of a drive-by shooting." One does wonder why the VSB was able to have a hearing and come to that conclusion, but the federal judge in Indiana slammed the door of the courthouse in my face.