ILNews

Year-end rush for CLE set to begin

Jenny Montgomery
November 23, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

After Thanksgiving, an annual tradition begins for Indiana attorneys. It’s what some people call the “mad rush” to finish continuing legal education requirements by year’s end.

A rule adopted by the Indiana Supreme Court in 1986 has required lawyers – beginning in January 1987 – to complete 36 hours of CLE credit per three-year cycle. That means that for many lawyers in the state, the three-year cycle ended in 2010. Even so, 2011 will see its share of last-minute efforts to finish CLE.

Scott King, program director for the Indiana Continuing Legal Education Forum, said around the end of October calls increase from firms and bar associations requesting to host ICLEF video replays.

“It’s human nature. People have a lot of priorities in their lives, and CLE is not always at the top of that list until the fourth quarter of the year,” he said.

Video replays

For those who have been too busy to attend CLE sessions in-person, video replays offer a second chance – or a last chance – to complete requirements.

Maribeth Leininger, executive director of the Allen County Bar Association, said the bar offers five days of “last-chance” video CLE sessions, which are repeat performances of its summer brown bag lunch offerings.

“We have multiple opportunities for attorneys to fulfill CLE requirements, and for those attorneys who call us the first week of December needing their hours, we can accommodate them,” she said.

The Indianapolis Bar Association offers “11th Hour Video Replays” Dec. 27-29, which are also repeats of live CLE sessions it offered throughout the year.

CLECorydon attorney Harold Dillman said his three-attorney law office has been hosting video replays for at least six years. Dillman is hosting a two-day replay of the 2011 Elder Law Institute on Nov. 30 and Dec. 1 and a daylong probate litigation replay on Dec. 29.

“It keeps me from having to drive to Indianapolis,” he said. And Dillman, who is licensed to practice in Indiana and Kentucky, is able to earn CLE credits for both states by hosting one video replay. Occasionally, attorneys from outside the firm will sign up for the CLE replays.

“You never know – it’s not unusual that there just isn’t anybody, but some years, I’ve had a dozen,” he said.

Online options

Since 1996, the Indiana Supreme Court Commission for Continuing Legal Education has allowed attorneys to earn CLE credit by watching programming online, and ICLEF generally offers between 40 and 55 online programs, King said.

“There’s always something for somebody that’s relevant to watch – and we have people who log into those programs right up until midnight on Dec. 31,” King said.

Anyone who purchases an online CLE through ICLEF can access the presentation for 30 days, which means it can be watched in segments, as time allows. But be warned: if you nod off during an online CLE, ICLEF will know.

“We have what’s called a random verifier encoded in our webcasting programming, and it will at random times check your attendance at the program,” King said. “Two attorneys watching the same program will not get the same verifier popping up on their screen. If you do not respond to it, the program will shut down.”

Meeting the need

ICLEF offers an all-day, in-person CLE on Dec. 31, but most bar associations stop offering CLE before that date. The Evansville Bar Association, for example, will offer no CLE between Dec. 19 and Jan. 5 – a point that was communicated to members in giant red type in the bar’s November newsletter.

Sometimes, people can’t find exactly what they’re looking for at a time or place that works for them. That’s why Leininger sometimes sees lawyers from all over the state – including Evansville – attending last-minute CLE in Fort Wayne. She also sees people registering for CLE programs who may be in town visiting relatives but are trying to make the most of their time.

Many late-year CLE programs will offer some ethics component, as the three-year cycle must include three hours of ethics CLE.

“Ethics seems to be probably the most requested subject matter, but second to that it’s really across the board … estate planning, family law, things of that nature,” King said.

Financial help

Attorneys who need help covering the cost of CLE may apply for a grant from Indiana Bar Foundation’s ICLEF Scholarship Fund. Lawyers must apply at least two weeks in advance of the CLE they wish to attend, and the award covers only six hours of CLE.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hi there I really need help with getting my old divorce case back into court - I am still paying support on a 24 year old who has not been in school since age 16 - now living independent. My visitation with my 14 year old has never been modified; however, when convenient for her I can have him... I am paying past balance from over due support, yet earn several thousand dollars less. I would contact my original attorney but he basically molest me multiple times in Indy when I would visit.. Todd Woodmansee - I had just came out and had know idea what to do... I have heard he no longer practices. Please help1

  2. Yes diversity is so very important. With justice Rucker off ... the court is too white. Still too male. No Hispanic justice. No LGBT justice. And there are other checkboxes missing as well. This will not do. I say hold the seat until a physically handicapped Black Lesbian of Hispanic heritage and eastern religious creed with bipolar issues can be located. Perhaps an international search, with a preference for third world candidates, is indicated. A non English speaker would surely increase our diversity quotient!!!

  3. First, I want to thank Justice Rucker for his many years of public service, not just at the appellate court level for over 25 years, but also when he served the people of Lake County as a Deputy Prosecutor, City Attorney for Gary, IN, and in private practice in a smaller, highly diverse community with a history of serious economic challenges, ethnic tensions, and recently publicized but apparently long-standing environmental health risks to some of its poorest residents. Congratulations for having the dedication & courage to practice law in areas many in our state might have considered too dangerous or too poor at different points in time. It was also courageous to step into a prominent and highly visible position of public service & respect in the early 1990's, remaining in a position that left you open to state-wide public scrutiny (without any glitches) for over 25 years. Yes, Hoosiers of all backgrounds can take pride in your many years of public service. But people of color who watched your ascent to the highest levels of state government no doubt felt even more as you transcended some real & perhaps some perceived social, economic, academic and professional barriers. You were living proof that, with hard work, dedication & a spirit of public service, a person who shared their same skin tone or came from the same county they grew up in could achieve great success. At the same time, perhaps unknowingly, you helped fellow members of the judiciary, court staff, litigants and the public better understand that differences that are only skin-deep neither define nor limit a person's character, abilities or prospects in life. You also helped others appreciate that people of different races & backgrounds can live and work together peacefully & productively for the greater good of all. Those are truths that didn't have to be written down in court opinions. Anyone paying attention could see that truth lived out every day you devoted to public service. I believe you have been a "trailblazer" in Indiana's legal community and its judiciary. I also embrace your belief that society's needs can be better served when people in positions of governmental power reflect the many complexions of the population that they serve. Whether through greater understanding across the existing racial spectrum or through the removal of some real and some perceived color-based, hope-crushing barriers to life opportunities & success, movement toward a more reflective representation of the population being governed will lead to greater and uninterrupted respect for laws designed to protect all peoples' rights to life, liberty & the pursuit of happiness. Thanks again for a job well-done & for the inevitable positive impact your service has had - and will continue to have - on countless Hoosiers of all backgrounds & colors.

  4. Diversity is important, but with some limitations. For instance, diversity of experience is a great thing that can be very helpful in certain jobs or roles. Diversity of skin color is never important, ever, under any circumstance. To think that skin color changes one single thing about a person is patently racist and offensive. Likewise, diversity of values is useless. Some values are better than others. In the case of a supreme court justice, I actually think diversity is unimportant. The justices are not to impose their own beliefs on rulings, but need to apply the law to the facts in an objective manner.

  5. Have been seeing this wonderful physician for a few years and was one of his patients who told him about what we were being told at CVS. Multiple ones. This was a witch hunt and they shold be ashamed of how patients were treated. Most of all, CVS should be ashamed for what they put this physician through. So thankful he fought back. His office is no "pill mill'. He does drug testing multiple times a year and sees patients a minimum of four times a year.

ADVERTISEMENT