ILNews

65 years in the law

Holly Wheeler
August 14, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

World War II had just ended and the Baby Boom generation was making its debut when Philip “Skip” Kappes graduated from the University of Michigan Law School. It was 1948 and, for those who were not alive or just too young to remember that time, the following are a few facts that might help you gain perspective on the differences in American society between then and now.

Men wore hats and women wore dresses (with pantyhose).

The average annual salary was $3,600, and a loaf of bread cost 14 cents.

kappes Philip “Skip” Kappes (IL Photo/ Aaron P. Bernstein)

Neither I-70 nor I-65 existed. And Hamilton County, which includes Carmel, Fishers and Noblesville, had a population of less than 30,000. (It was nearly 290,000 in 2010.)

It certainly was a different world – legally as well as culturally. Kappes, who was born in Detroit and moved with his family to Indianapolis in the 1930s, was the first of his clan to pursue law. After completing his undergraduate degree at Butler University, he found law school to be very different from his previous academic experiences. One big difference was his age.

“I was the youngest in my class when I started law school,” Kappes said. “I was 19 and the rest of the class was made up of men who had been in the war. They were 26, 27 and they had a lot more experiences than I had.”

Another difference was the study of law itself. Unlike the pre-law courses he completed at Butler, Kappes found that law school sought analysis and interpretation of concepts as opposed to rote memorization of facts.

These differences ultimately gave Kappes a unique perspective on law, as did his first position as an attorney with the Indianapolis Legal Aid Society. After representing a client in what he describes as a lengthy and somewhat ridiculous case, he was asked to become counsel for the defendant – the very business he’d successfully sued.

“If you do good work, word gets around and that probably is your most successful form of marketing,” he said, “unlike the client that you get from marketing, because you’ve gone to the client. When the client comes to you there’s an entirely different relationship that evolves.”

Learn as you go

Kappes moved from ILAS to a position as associate at Armstrong and Gause where he occupied a desk behind the receptionist in the lobby. A number of his first clients came from the friendships he’d established as a member of the Butler University Alumni Association. He moved to C.B. Dutton where he met Ben Dutton, with whom he’d eventually form the firm Dutton Kappes and Overman. Over time he came to specialize in business law, a term that under-defines the field.

“Business law can extend from intellectual property, patents, labor disputes and contracts to personal injury, estate planning and even family law,” he said. “If the CEO’s son has a traffic accident, the company’s attorney will be involved.”

Adaptability, however, isn’t the only key to success in business law. The other is an understanding of that business. Without such knowledge it’s impossible to accurately represent a corporate client’s legal interests. Learning about different businesses and how they work stemmed from Kappes’ youth when he and his brother would go on sales calls with their father.

Continually evolving

In time, Dutton Kappes and Overman grew to more than 30 attorneys and a partnership that lasted for 30 years. As that firm began to dissolve, Kappes established another, Lewis & Kappes P.C., where he still practices today.

Through his 65-year career, he’s observed much. Some of his observations can be classified as trend and others as truth. One truth is that law evolves, not just in the United States, but elsewhere.

“Our laws have evolved since I began practicing,” Kappes said. “When I started, it was a lengthy legal process to establish a company, to become incorporated or establish a legal partnership. It was necessary to petition the courts. Now it’s easy to become incorporated. When I traveled to Asia on legal business in the 1950s, I saw that their system was far behind ours. Today, those nations are legally similar to what we were back then. They require the same sort of lengthy legal process to incorporate that we did 60 years ago.”

His perspective allows him to keenly consider whether the practice of law is improving as it evolves. A legal trend he identifies is the growing length of the discovery process, and he questions whether it efficiently uses clients’ time and money.

“When I started practicing law, there was precious little in the way of discovery,” Kappes said, “and so you had what I call the ‘sporting theory of justice’: You went with what you knew and what you had, but you never really got to take a peek at the other guy’s cards like we do today. As a consequence you went to court, but you had to be prepared and pretty flexible and fast on your feet because evidence could come up that you had no idea ever existed. Now, that doesn’t happen very often because you have the discovery rules and you pretty much know.

“While there’s a powerful argument to be made, ‘Why let everybody go blindly into these lawsuits?’ I’m not sure we’re doing it as efficiently as we should. Cases take far too long to resolve, and as a consequence I’m not sure that there’s a uniformity of delivering a good product at a fair price. I’m not as worried about the good product – we’re certainly capable of that – I worry that such things as law’s rules, such as discovery, have become an impediment to the settlement of disputes rather than facilitating it.”

Cultivating the community

Philanthropic works extend back to Kappes’ earliest career and include involvement in the Boy Scouts, Butler University, the Masons, the Indianapolis Scottish Rite and Fairbanks Hospital. As with many aspects of his life, Kappes’ work in the community stems from personal interest and family ties.

“My brother was our kids’ scoutmaster,” he said. “He had three boys and I had two, and out of that batch we got four Eagles and a Life Scout. So he did pretty well.”

Other organizations weren’t top of mind, but friendships and business connections led to his volunteerism. Fairbanks, for instance, wasn’t something Kappes knew much about, but a friend’s encouragement led to his long-term involvement.

As a citizen of Indianapolis, Kappes has given back through his professional and personal work. Possessing the second-longest active law license in the state, he still works at Lewis & Kappes a few days a week.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Family First
    Skip's late wife, Dotie, played a significant role in his success, as he is the first to acknowledge, and together they raises a great family. As a young lawyer myself, growing up in the Indpls. legal community, I always admired their strong marital partnership and the obvious joy they derived from being in each other's company at bar and civic events. I know Skip misses her dearly now that she is no longer at his side to make him laugh and to share life's vicissitudes! Seb
  • Great Mentor
    Skip was a great mentor to the associates hired by Dutton Kappes & Overman. His door was always open for professional and personal advice. He even loaned out his snow skis.
  • Respected Lawyer
    Both in the legal practice and in his community involvment, SKIP always was someone to look up to and to respect. We all in this Indianapolis community have been lucky to have him as a symbol of decency.
  • How times have changed
    In 1948, women did not wear pantyhose but nylon stockings with girdles or garter belts. Much more constricting! Mr. Kappes practiced law for 20 years before women experienced the "freedom" of pantyhose

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT