ILNews

Yonally: Young Lawyers Section creates connections

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana Lawyer Focus

The Young Lawyer Section of the Indiana Trial Lawyers Association is made up of 250 attorneys who have been practicing law for less than 10 years and who are committed to advancing the mission of the association. ITLA offers invaluable opportunities for professional growth, networking, and education for all trial attorneys, but the benefit of ITLA membership is especially great for young lawyers. In the past year, the Young Lawyer Section has organized several social events, including lunches and happy hours, which provide young attorneys with an opportunity to network and build camaraderie with their peers. In addition to these events, the Young Lawyer Section also maintains an active e-mail listserv that provides an ideal forum for asking questions, sharing experiences and ideas, and obtaining feedback from both our peers and our more experienced colleagues. ITLA also offers young attorneys opportunities to become more politically active and involved in the legislative process, to attend CLE sessions focused on issues facing young attorneys, and opportunities to mentor and be mentored as we move through the early years of practicing law.

yonally Yonally

Recently, the ITLA Young Lawyer Section awarded an outstanding young attorney with the 2010 Max Goodwin Young Lawyer Award. This award is presented to a member of the section who exemplifies civility and professionalism and who contributes to advancing Indiana law in a positive direction for Indiana consumers. This year, Tara Wozniak Worthley from Valparaiso was selected as the award recipient from a group of accomplished young lawyers. Since being sworn into practice in 2005, Tara has devoted her professional career to representing injured patients and consumers of the state of Indiana. She has been involved in numerous medical malpractice trials and has been instrumental in several appeals and a petition for rehearing to the Indiana Supreme Court. Tara has also participated in writing amicus curiae briefs on behalf of the ITLA Amicus Committee. Outside of work, Tara is active in her community and volunteers her time with the Big Brothers/Big Sisters of Central Indiana. Tara is an associate attorney with Langer & Langer and was inducted in 2010 as one of newest members of the ITLA Board of Directors.

The section has an exciting agenda for 2011, including continuing to provide social events and CLE opportunities, developing an organized mentoring program, assisting ITLA in its legislative efforts, and working together on a community service project. The Young Lawyer Section looks forward to building on the momentum of 2010 in the coming New Year!•
__________

Indianapolis lawyer Amanda Yonally serves as chair of the ITLA Young Lawyers Section. The opinions expressed here are those of the author.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. CCHP's real accomplishment is the 2015 law signed by Gov Pence that basically outlaws any annexation that is forced where a 65% majority of landowners in the affected area disagree. Regardless of whether HP wins or loses, the citizens of Indiana will not have another fiasco like this. The law Gov Pence signed is a direct result of this malgovernance.

  2. I gave tempparry guardship to a friend of my granddaughter in 2012. I went to prison. I had custody. My daughter went to prison to. We are out. My daughter gave me custody but can get her back. She was not order to give me custody . but now we want granddaughter back from friend. She's 14 now. What rights do we have

  3. This sure is not what most who value good governance consider the Rule of Law to entail: "In a letter dated March 2, which Brizzi forwarded to IBJ, the commission dismissed the grievance “on grounds that there is not reasonable cause to believe that you are guilty of misconduct.”" Yet two month later reasonable cause does exist? (Or is the commission forging ahead, the need for reasonable belief be damned? -- A seeming violation of the Rules of Profession Ethics on the part of the commission) Could the rule of law theory cause one to believe that an explanation is in order? Could it be that Hoosier attorneys live under Imperial Law (which is also a t-word that rhymes with infamy) in which the Platonic guardians can do no wrong and never owe the plebeian class any explanation for their powerful actions. (Might makes it right?) Could this be a case of politics directing the commission, as celebrated IU Mauer Professor (the late) Patrick Baude warned was happening 20 years ago in his controversial (whisteblowing) ethics lecture on a quite similar topic: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1498&context=ilj

  4. I have a case presently pending cert review before the SCOTUS that reveals just how Indiana regulates the bar. I have been denied licensure for life for holding the wrong views and questioning the grand inquisitors as to their duties as to state and federal constitutional due process. True story: https://www.scribd.com/doc/299040839/2016Petitionforcert-to-SCOTUS Shorter, Amici brief serving to frame issue as misuse of govt licensure: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners

  5. Here's an idea...how about we MORE heavily regulate the law schools to reduce the surplus of graduates, driving starting salaries up for those new grads, so that we can all pay our insane amount of student loans off in a reasonable amount of time and then be able to afford to do pro bono & low-fee work? I've got friends in other industries, radiology for example, and their schools accept a very limited number of students so there will never be a glut of new grads and everyone's pay stays high. For example, my radiologist friend's school accepted just six new students per year.

ADVERTISEMENT