Lawyers seeking Christie’s phone records cite Watergate

Keywords Courts / Government / neglect
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Lawyers seeking New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's cellphone records from the George Washington Bridge lane-closing case are invoking Watergate to argue their subpoena for the information is justified.

In filings late Monday opposing an attempt to block a request for the records, the attorneys for two indicted former Christie allies also repeated accusations that the law firm representing Christie's office has deliberately refused to turn over documents it is obligated to produce and ignored potentially damaging evidence.

The attorneys represent indicted former Port Authority of New York and New Jersey executive Bill Baroni and former Christie staffer Bridget Kelly, who face wire fraud, civil rights and other charges and are scheduled for trial in September.

They argue the Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher law firm must turn over communications Christie made during the September 2013 lane closures and text messages he sent to a staffer during Baroni's testimony to a legislative committee in 2013.

The request satisfies the standard set by the Supreme Court in ordering Nixon to turn over the Watergate tapes — that there is a "sufficient likelihood" based on "rational inferences" the materials will lead to relevant and admissible evidence, they wrote.

The text messages are crucial, Baroni attorney Michael Baldassare wrote, because Baroni is accused of concocting a story for the committee about the lane closures being part of a traffic study to cover up their actual intent: to punish a local mayor for not endorsing Christie.

Christie hasn't been charged and was absolved of wrongdoing by a 2014 report by the Gibson Dunn firm, which has billed the state more than $10 million for representing Christie's office in the matter. The report was criticized for not including interviews with any of those charged or with any employees of the Port Authority, including former official David Wildstein, who pleaded guilty last year.

Christie said last month he gave his phone to the government two years ago and wasn't sure who has it now. The U.S. attorney's office has previously said it doesn't have the phone, and a spokesman didn't immediately return an email message Tuesday seeking comment on that. Randy Mastro, the lead attorney representing Christie for Gibson Dunn, didn't respond to an email Tuesday about the phone's whereabouts.

In its previous filings, "Gibson Dunn deftly avoids saying whether or not it still has the Governor's phone," Baldassare wrote Monday. "The location of that device — and those of his senior staff — remains a closely guarded secret."

Attorney Michael Critchley, representing Kelly, accused Gibson Dunn of "doing nothing" to investigate Christie's text exchanges.

"GDC's apparent blind spot for damaging information concerning Governor Christie and his senior staff (except, of course, Ms. Kelly) is hardly surprising because holding others to the same standard as Ms. Kelly would have been disastrous to GDC's propaganda campaign," Critchley wrote.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining
{{ articles_remaining }}
Free {{ article_text }} Remaining Article limit resets on
{{ count_down }}