ILBlogs

First Impressions
Jennifer Mehalik
More First Impressions

Recent Blog Posts

High cost of law school

Jennifer Nelson
March 2, 2012
Comments(0)
The American Lawyer has an interesting article about why law school tuition keeps going up. As a law school applicant, you’re partly to blame.
More

March is the 'divorce' month

Jennifer Nelson
February 29, 2012
Comments(0)
Move over January, March is taking over as the month when divorce filings peak.
More

Less lawyers lunching

Jennifer Nelson
February 15, 2012
Comments(0)
A recent survey shows attorneys are conducting fewer business lunches. Looks like the “power lunches” aren’t so powerful anymore.
More

Looking at law students' experiences

Jennifer Nelson
January 24, 2012
Comments(0)
Law school students aren’t interacting much with international students, something that may hurt them as they prepare for a more internationally diverse environment.
More

'The Puppet's Court'

Jennifer Nelson
January 20, 2012
Comments(0)
No cameras in court? No problem! One news station has decided to cover a federal corruption trial using puppets.
More

Class basketball supporters can relax, for now

Jennifer Nelson
January 19, 2012
Comments(0)
The Indiana state senator who called for an end to class basketball has called a time out on his legislation.
More

Study tackles transparency of law schools

Jennifer Nelson
January 18, 2012
Comments(0)
A Tennessee nonprofit is calling out law schools for their lack of accessible information on recent graduates.
More

The short session begins

Jennifer Nelson
January 4, 2012
Comment(1)
Indiana’s General Assembly reconvenes Wednesday with legislators looking to tackle human trafficking before the Super Bowl comes to town and address right-to-work legislation.
And as with every session, there are those bills that leave me wondering if our legislators don’t have better things to worry about.
 
More
Page  << 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >> pager
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT