Privacy Policy

Indiana Lawyer Privacy Statement:

Indiana Lawyer will never share your private information (e-mail address, etc.) with anyone unless you expressly request Indiana Lawyer to do so.

Indiana Lawyer has created this privacy statement in order to demonstrate our firm commitment to privacy. We will never sell or transfer any information we collect from you unless you specifically request that we do so. We do not sell, rent, or give your information to any other company.

The following discloses our information gathering and dissemination practices for this website: www.theindianalawyer.com.

We use your IP address to help diagnose problems with our server, and to administer our Web site. Registration forms on theindianalawyer.com may require users to give contact information (such as their name and e-mail address) and demographic information (such as their zip code, age, or phone number). We use customer contact information from the registration forms to send the user information about our company and promotional material about some of our partners.

Demographic and profile data is also collected at our site. We use this data to tailor our communication with our visitors. We do not share this information with anyone.

This site may contain links to other sites. theindianalawyer.com is not responsible for the privacy practices or the content of such Web sites.

Third parties provide some of the content provided on this Website. These parties do not have access to any of the information you provide Indiana Lawyer via this site. Demographic and profile data is also collected at our site. We do not share this information with anyone.

Our site uses cookies to track visitors to our site.

Security
This site has security measures in place to protect the loss, misuse and alteration of the information under our control.

This site gives users the following options for removing their information from our database to not receive future communications or to no longer receive our service. You can send e-mail to webmaster@ibj.com.

Correct/Update
This site gives users the following options for changing and modifying information previously provided. Send e-mail to: webmaster@ibj.com.

Questions
If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, or your dealings with this Web site, you can contact: IBJ Corp., 41 E. Washington St., Indianapolis, IN 46204; (317)634-6200
 

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  2. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  3. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

  4. Justice has finally been served. So glad that Dr. Ley can finally sleep peacefully at night knowing the truth has finally come to the surface.

  5. While this right is guaranteed by our Constitution, it has in recent years been hampered by insurance companies, i.e.; the practice of the plaintiff's own insurance company intervening in an action and filing a lien against any proceeds paid to their insured. In essence, causing an additional financial hurdle for a plaintiff to overcome at trial in terms of overall award. In a very real sense an injured party in exercise of their right to trial by jury may be the only party in a cause that would end up with zero compensation.

ADVERTISEMENT