Privacy Policy

Indiana Lawyer Privacy Statement:

Indiana Lawyer will never share your private information (e-mail address, etc.) with anyone unless you expressly request Indiana Lawyer to do so.

Indiana Lawyer has created this privacy statement in order to demonstrate our firm commitment to privacy. We will never sell or transfer any information we collect from you unless you specifically request that we do so. We do not sell, rent, or give your information to any other company.

The following discloses our information gathering and dissemination practices for this website: www.theindianalawyer.com.

We use your IP address to help diagnose problems with our server, and to administer our Web site. Registration forms on theindianalawyer.com may require users to give contact information (such as their name and e-mail address) and demographic information (such as their zip code, age, or phone number). We use customer contact information from the registration forms to send the user information about our company and promotional material about some of our partners.

Demographic and profile data is also collected at our site. We use this data to tailor our communication with our visitors. We do not share this information with anyone.

This site may contain links to other sites. theindianalawyer.com is not responsible for the privacy practices or the content of such Web sites.

Third parties provide some of the content provided on this Website. These parties do not have access to any of the information you provide Indiana Lawyer via this site. Demographic and profile data is also collected at our site. We do not share this information with anyone.

Our site uses cookies to track visitors to our site.

Security
This site has security measures in place to protect the loss, misuse and alteration of the information under our control.

This site gives users the following options for removing their information from our database to not receive future communications or to no longer receive our service. You can send e-mail to webmaster@ibj.com.

Correct/Update
This site gives users the following options for changing and modifying information previously provided. Send e-mail to: webmaster@ibj.com.

Questions
If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, or your dealings with this Web site, you can contact: IBJ Corp., 41 E. Washington St., Indianapolis, IN 46204; (317)634-6200
 

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT